Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 48–59 | Cite as

Link between Aggressiveness and Shyness in the Spider Philodromus albidus (Araneae, Philodromidae): State Dependency over Stability

  • Radek Michalko
  • Ondřej Košulič
  • Radomil Řežucha
Article

Abstract

Behavioral syndromes, seen as correlations among two or more functionally different behaviors, are well documented in many different animal taxa. They may not be present automatically, however, and their consistency within populations and individuals also varies among studies. Here, we studied a behavioral syndrome comprising foraging aggressiveness and boldness/shyness and its time consistency in the cursorial spider Philodromus albidus. We measured foraging aggressiveness as the number of prey killed per 2-hour period. Boldness/shyness was assessed as a latency of initiating exploration in a novel environment. We found the presence of the behavioral syndrome in P. albidus, as bold individuals were also more aggressive than were shy individuals. The syndrome was consistent through time within the population but not consistent for individuals. We further discuss the possible causes of the pattern.

Keywords

State dependent behavior Flexibility inter-individual differences behavioral syndrome boldness personality type 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Petr Dolejš and to the anonymous reviewers for their comments that greatly improved our manuscript. RM and RŘ were supported by student grant no. MUNI/A/1484/2014 from Masaryk University. OK was supported by the European Social Fund and state budget of the Czech Republic, the project “Indicators of Trees Vitality” (Reg. No. CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0265), and by the Internal Grant Agency of Mendel University (Reg. No. LDF_VT_2016002/2016).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ariyomo TO, Carter M, Watt PJ (2013) Heritability of boldness and aggressiveness in the zebrafish. Behav Genet 43:161–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell AM (2005) Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Evolution Biol 18:464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell AM, Sih A (2007) Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecol Lett 10:828–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergmüller R, Taborsky M (2010) Animal personality due to social niche specialisation. Trends Ecol Evol 25:504–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchar J, Růžička V (2002) Catalogue of spiders of the Czech Republic. Peres publishers, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  8. Carere C, Maestripieri D (2013) Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castanheira MF, Cerqueira M, Millot S, Gonçalves RA, Oliveira CCV, Conceição LEC, Martins CIM (2016) Are personality traits consistent in fish? — the influence of social context. Appl Anim Behav Sci 178:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerau V, Thomas D, Humphries MM, Réale D (2008) Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos 117:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dingemanse NJ, Wright J, Kazem AJN, Thomas DK, Hickling R, Dawney N (2007) Behavioural syndromes differ predictably between 12 populations of three-spined stickleback. J Anim Ecol 76:1128–1138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dowling LM, Godin JJ (2002) Refuge use in a killifish: influence of body size and nutritional state. Can J Zool 80:782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dukas R (2004) Causes and consequences of limited attention. Brain Behav Evol 63:197–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Frost AJ, Winrow-Giffen A, Ashley PJ, Sneddon LU (2007) Plasticity in animal personality traits: does prior experience alter the degree of boldness? Proc R Soc B 274:333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gosling SD (2001) From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol Bull 127:45–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haynes DL, Sisojević P (1966) Predatory behavior of Philodromus rufus Walckenaer (Araneae: Thomisidae). Can Entomol 98:113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huntingford FA (1976) The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 24:245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson RR, Pollard SD, Cerveira AM (2002) Opportunistic use of cognitive smokescreens by araneophagic jumping spiders. Anim Cogn 5:147–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson JC, Sih A (2005) Precopulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson JC, Sih A (2007) Fear, food, sex and parental care: a syndrome of boldness in the fishing spider, Dolomedes triton. Anim Behav 74:1131–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones TC, Akoury TS, Hauser CK, Neblett MF, Linville BJ, Edge AA, Weber NO (2011) Octopamine and serotonin have opposite effect on antipredator behavior in the orb-weaving spider, Larinioides cornutus. J Comp Physiol A 197:819–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kralj-Fišer S, Schneider JM (2012) Individual behavioural consistency and plasticity in an urban spider. Anim Behav 84:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kralj-Fišer S, Schuett W (2014) Studying personality variation in invertebrates: why bother? Anim Behav 91:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayntz D, Toft S (2006) Nutritional value of cannibalism and the role of starvation and nutrient imbalance for cannibalistic tendencies in a generalist predator. J Anim Ecol 75:288–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Michalko R, Pekár S (2014) Is different degree of individual specialisation in three closely related spider species caused by different selection pressures? Bass Appl Ecol 15:496–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michalko R, Pekár S (2015a) The biocontrol potential of Philodromus (Araneae, Philodromidae) spiders for the suppression of pome fruit orchard pests. Biol Control 82:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Michalko R, Pekár S (2015b) Niche partitioning and niche filtering jointly mediate coexistence among three closely related spider species (Araneae, Philodromidae). Ecol Entomol 40:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85:935–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pekár S, Brabec M (2009) Moderní analýza biologických dat 1. Zobecněné lineární modely v prostředí R [Modern analysis of biological data 1. Generalized linear models in R]. Scientia, Praha (in Czech)Google Scholar
  30. Pekár S, Brabec M (2012) Moderní analýza biologických dat 2. Lineární modely s korelacemi v prostředí R (modern analysis of biological data 2. Linear models with correlation in R). Masaryk University Press, Brno (in Czech)Google Scholar
  31. Platnick NI (2014) The world spider catalog, 14.5. http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog. Accessed 20 January 2014
  32. Pruitt JN (2010) Differential selection on sprint speed and ad libitum feeding behaviour in active vs. sit-and-wait foraging spiders. Funct Ecol 24:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pruitt JN, Riechert JE (2012) The ecological consequences of temperament in spiders. Curr Zool 58:589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pruitt JN, Demes KW, Dittrich-Reed DR (2011a) Temperature mediates shifts in individual aggressiveness, activity level, and social behavior in a spider. Ethology 117:318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pruitt JN, Riechert JE, Harris DJ (2011b) Reproductive consequences of male body mass and aggressiveness depend on female’ behavioral types. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1957–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 20 January 2014Google Scholar
  37. Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82:291–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Řežucha R, Smith C, Reichard M (2012) Personality traits, reproductive behaviour and alternative mating tactics in male European bitterling, Rhodeus amarus. Behaviour 149:531–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riechert SE, Hedrick AV (1993) A test for correlation among fitness-linked behavioural traits in the spider Agelenopsis aperta (Araneae, Agelenidae). Anim Behav 46:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmitz OJ (2005) Behavior of predators and prey and links with population-level processes. In: Barbosa P, Castellanos I (eds) Ecology of predator-prey interactions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2010) Behavioral syndromes. In: Westneat DE, Fox CW (eds) Evolutionary behavioral ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007) Foraging. Behavior and ecology. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sweeney K, Gadd RDH, Hess ZL, McDermott DR, MacDonald L, Cotter P, Armagost F, Chen JZ, Berning AW, DiRienzo N, Pruitt JN (2013) Assessing the effects of rearing environment, natural selection, and developmental stage on the emergence of a behavioral syndrome. Ethology 119:436–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Toft S (2013) Nutritional aspects of spider feeding. In: Nentwig W (ed) Spider ecophysiology. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Walker SE, Rypstra AL (2003) Hungry spiders aren’t afraid of the big bad wolf spider. J Arachnol 31:425–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watts JC, Ross CR, Jones TC (2015) Diel and life-history characteristics of personality: consistency versus flexibility in relation to ecological change. Anim Behav 101:43-49Google Scholar
  47. Wilder SM (2011) Spider nutrition: an integrative perspective. Adv Insect Physiol 40:87–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson DS, Clark AB, Coleman K, Dearstyne T (1994) Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends Ecol Evol 9:442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2010) An explanatory framework for animal personalities differences. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:3959–3968CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2012) Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 27:452–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolf M, van Doorn GS, Leimar O, Weissing FJ (2007) Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature 447:581–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radek Michalko
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ondřej Košulič
    • 3
  • Radomil Řežucha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany and ZoologyMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Forest EcologyMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife ManagementMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations