Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 175–185 | Cite as

Side-Dominance of Periplaneta americana Persists Through Antenna Amputation

  • Rodrigo Cooper
  • Nicholas Nudo
  • Jorge M. González
  • S. Bradleigh Vinson
  • Hong LiangEmail author


While brain lateralization is widely studied for vertebrates, only a few studies have been performed on insects. In the present research, we investigated the behavior of the common American cockroach, Periplaneta americana, to determine if such lateralization is evident through their decision making process. The roaches were allowed to run through a y-tube and make a decision on which direction to take. Vanilla and ethanol were randomly placed at the ends of the y-tube to entice the roaches to reach the end of the tubes. Tests were repeated by severing one antenna on each roach in different configurations which were expected to alter the decision of the insect. Through a simple statistical analysis we determined that the odors of vanilla and ethanol play an insignificant role in the decision making. We found that injury to the antenna indeed affected their decision, However, similar injury to either antenna showed an innate bias for turning right. Our research supports the hypothesis that Periplaneta americana is right-side dominated in their tactile and odor senses.


Side-preference Periplaneta americana y-tube antenna 



The research was supported by the NSF 0515930. The authors thank Ms. S. Jill Butler from Industrial Engineering at Texas A&M University for assistance in collecting and analyzing the data. We are indebted to Robert W. Matthews (University of Georgia) for his enlightening comments. SEM image collected by Hyungoo Lee at the Texas A&M University was greatly acknowledged.


  1. Balderrama N (1980) One trial learning in the american cockroach, periplaneta americana. J Insect Physiol 26:499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beament JWL (1955) Wax secretion in the cockroach. J Exp Biol 32:514–538Google Scholar
  3. Bell WJ (1982) The american cockroachGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisazza AJ, Rogers L, Vallortigara G (1998) The origins of cerebral asymmetry: a review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, reptiles and amphibians. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:411–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeckh J, Priesner E, Schneider D, Jacobson M (1963) Olfactory receptor response to the cockroach sexual attractant. Science 141:716–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camhi JM, Johnson EN (1999) High-frequency steering maneuvers mediated by tactile cues: Antennal wall-following in the cockroach. J Exp Biol 202:631–643PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper R, Lee H, Gonzalez JM, Butler J, Vinson SB, Liang H (2009) Lubrication and surface properties of roach cuticle. J Tribol 131:014502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cowan NJ, Lee J, Full RJ (2006) Task-level control of rapid wall following in the american cockroach. J Exp Biol 209:1617–1629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duistermars BJ, Chow DM, Frye MA (2009) Flies require bilateral sensory input to track odor gradients in flight. Curr Biol 19:1301–1307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisemann CH, Jorgensen WK, Merritt DJ, Rice MJ, Cribb BW, Webb PD, Zalucki MP (1984) Do insects feel pain?—a biological view. Cell Mol Life Sci 40:164–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frasnelli E, Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2010) Response competition associated with right-left antennal asymmetries of new and old olfactory memory traces in honeybees. Behav Brain Res 209:36–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Getz WM, Akers RP (1997a) Coding properties of peak and average response rates in american cockroach olfactory sensory cells. Biosystems 40:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Getz WM, Akers RP (1997b) Response of american cockroach (periplaneta americana) olfactory receptors to selected alcohol odorants and their binary combinations. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 180:701–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeanson R, Deneubourg J-L (2006) Path selection in cockroaches. J Exp Biol 209:4768–4775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kells AR, Goulson D (2001) Evidence for handedness in bumblebees. J Insect Behav 14:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuwana Y, Shimoyama I, Miura H (1995) Steering control of a mobile robot using insect antennae. In: Shimoyama I (ed) Intelligent robots and systems 95. ‘Human robot interaction and cooperative robots’, Proceedings. 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, vol. 2. pp 530–535 vol. 2Google Scholar
  17. Letzkus P, Ribi WA, Wood JT, Zhu H, Zhang S-W, Srinivasan MV (2006) Lateralization of olfaction in the honeybee apis mellifera. Curr Biol 16:1471–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Louis M, Huber T, Benton R, Sakmar TP, Vosshall LB (2008) Bilateral olfactory sensory input enhances chemotaxis behavior. Nat Neurosci 11:187–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mason RL, Gunst RF, Hess JL (2003) Statistical design and analysis of experiments: with applications to engineering and science. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  20. Morita H (1959) Initiation of spike potentials in contact chemosensory hairs of insects. Iii. D.C. Stimulation and generator potential of labellar chemoreceptor of calliphora. J Cell Comp Physiol 54:189–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morita H, Yamashita S (1959) Generator potential of insect chemoreceptor. Science 130:922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Okada J, Toh Y (2004) Antennal system in cockroaches: a biological model of active tactile sensing. Int Congr Ser 1269:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Okanoya K, Ikebuchi M, Uno H, Watanabe S (2001) Left-side dominance for song discrimination in bengalese finches (lonchura striata var. Domestica). Anim Cogn 4:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pascual A, Huang K-L, Neveu J, Preat T (2004) Neuroanatomy: brain asymmetry and long-term memory. Nature 427:605–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowell CHF (1964) Central control of an insect segmental reflex: I. Inhibition by different parts of the central nervous system. J Exp Biol 41:559–572Google Scholar
  26. Schaller D (1978) Antennal sensory system of periplaneta americana l. Cell Tissue Res 191:121–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schneider D (1964) Insect antennae. Annu Rev Entomol 9:103–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seelinger G, Tobin T (1981) Sense organs. In: The american cockroach. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 217–245Google Scholar
  29. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2005) Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav Brain Sci 28:575–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ, Bisazza A (1999) Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralization. Brain Res Rev 30:164–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waldow U, Sass H (1984) The attractivity of the female sex pheromone ofperiplaneta americana and its components for conspecific males and males ofperiplaneta australasiae in the field. J Chem Ecol 10:997–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wharton DRA, Black ED, Merritt C Jr, Wharton ML, Bazinet M, Walsh JT (1962) Isolation of the sex attractant of the american cockroach. Science 137:1062–1063PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wigglesworth VB (1980) Do insects feel pain? Antenna 1:8–9Google Scholar
  34. Willis MA, Avondet JL (2005) Odor-modulated orientation in walking male cockroaches periplaneta americana, and the effects of odor plumes of different structure. J Exp Biol 208:721–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodrigo Cooper
    • 1
  • Nicholas Nudo
    • 1
  • Jorge M. González
    • 2
  • S. Bradleigh Vinson
    • 2
  • Hong Liang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations