Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 473–476 | Cite as

Visual Plant Differentiation by the Milfoil Weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Article

Keywords

Host-plant location insect vision choice vs. no-choice trials insect behavior aquatic 

References

  1. Bloem S, Mizell RF, O’Brien CW (2002) Old traps for new weevils: new records for curculionids (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), brentids (Coleoptera: Brentidae), and anthribids (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) from Jefferson Co., Florida. Fla Entomol 85:632–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cuda JP, Charudattan R, Grodowitz MJ, Newman RM, Shearer JF, Tamayo ML, Villegas B (2008) Recent advances in biological control of submersed aquatic weeds. J Aquat Plant Manage 46:15–32Google Scholar
  3. Hoback WW, Svatos TM, Spomer SM, Higley LG (1999) Trap color and placement affects estimates of insect family-level abundance and diversity in a Nebraska salt marsh. Entomol Exp Appl 91:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Newman RM (2004) Biological control of Eurasian watermilfoil by aquatic insects: basic insights from an applied problem. Arch Hydrobiol 159:145–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Prokopy RJ, Owens ED (1978) Visual generalist with visual specialist phytophagous insects: host selection behavior and application to management. Entomol Exp Appl 24:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Reeves JL, Lorch PD, Kershner MW (2009) Vision is important for plant location by the phytophagous aquatic specialist Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera:Curculionidae). J Insect Behav 22:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations