Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 54–64

Vision is Important for Plant Location by the Phytophagous Aquatic Specialist Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

  • Justin L. Reeves
  • Patrick D. Lorch
  • Mark W. Kershner
Article

Abstract

The aquatic milfoil weevil Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a specialist on Myriophyllum spp. and is used as a biological control agent for Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.), an invasive aquatic macrophyte. We show evidence that visual cues are important for plant detection by these weevils. Weevils had difficulty locating plants in dark conditions and were highly attracted to plant stems in the light, even when the plant sample was sealed in a vial. However, weevils were equally attracted to both M. spicatum and another aquatic macrophyte, coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum L.) in vials. Turbidity (0–100 NTU) did not significantly influence visual plant detection by the weevils. This work fills a void in the literature regarding visual plant location by aquatic specialists and may help lead to a better understanding of when and where these weevils will find, accept, and damage their target host-plants.

Keywords

Host-plant location insect vision insect behavior biological control aquatic 

References

  1. Aluja M, Prokopy RJ (1993) Host odor and visual stimulus interaction during intratree host finding of Rhagoletis pomonella flies. J Chem Ecol 19:2671–2696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook CA, Neal JJ (1999) Plant finding and acceptance behaviors of Anasa tristis (DeGeer). J Insect Behav 12:781–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drew RAI, Prokopy RJ, Romig MC (2003) Attraction of fruit flies of the genus Bactrocera to colored mimics of host fruit. Entomol Exp Appl 107:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Egusa S, Nishida T, Fugisaki K, Sawada H (2006) Spatio-temporal abundance of flushing leaves shapes host selection in the willow leaf beetle, Plagiodera versicolora. Entomol Exp Appl 120:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finch S, Collier RH (2000) Host-plant selection by insects—a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomol Exp Appl 96:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gish M, Inbar M (2006) Host location by apterous aphids after escape dropping from the plant. J Insect Behav 19:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hajong SR, Raghu Varman A (2002) A report of positive phototaxis exhibited by polymorphic forms of an aphid. J Insect Behav 15:295–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hausmann C, Samietz J, Dorn S (2004) Visual orientation of overwintered Anthonomous pomorum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environ Emtomol 33:1410–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marko MD, Newman RM, Gleason FK (2005) Chemically mediated host-plant selection by the milfoil weevil: a freshwater insect–plant interaction. J Chem Ecol 31:2857–2876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Newman RM (2004) Biological control of Eurasian watermilfoil by aquatic insects: basic insights from an applied problem. Arch Hydrobiol 159:145–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Newman RM, Borman ME, Castro SW (1997) Developmental performance of the weevil Euhrychiopsis lecontei on native and exotic watermilfoil host plants. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:627–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Newman RM, Ragsdale DW, Milles A, Oien C (2001) Overwinter habitat and the relationship of overwinter to in-lake densities of the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei, a Eurasian watermilfoil biological control agent. J Aquat Plant Manage 39:63–67Google Scholar
  14. Patt JM, Setamou M (2007) Olfactory and visual stimuli affecting host plant detection Homalodisca coagulata (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Environ Entomol 36:142–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prokopy RJ, Owens ED (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:337–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roley S, Newman RM (2006) Developmental performance of the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), on northern watermilfoil, Eurasian watermilfoil, and hybrid (northern × Eurasian) watermilfoil. Environ Entomol 35:121–126Google Scholar
  17. Serandour J, Rey D, Raveton M (2006) Behavioural adaptation of Coquillettidia (Coquillettidia) richiardii larvae to underwater life: environmental cues governing plant–insect interaction. Entomol Exp Appl 120:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sheldon SP, Creed RP Jr (1995) Use of a native insect as a biological control for an introduced weed. Ecol Appl 5:1122–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Solarz SL, Newman RM (1996) Oviposition specificity and behavior of the watermilfoil specialist Euhrychiopsis lecontei. Oecologia 106:337–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Solarz SL, Newman RM (2001) Variation in hostplant preference and performance by the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz, exposed to native and exotic watermilfoils. Oecologia 126:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stenberg JA, Ericson L (2007) Visual cues override olfactory cues in the host-finding process of the monophagous leaf beetle Altica engstroemi. Entomol Exp Appl 125:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vargas RR, Troncoso AJ, Tapia DH, Olivares-Donoso R, Niemeyer HM (2005) Behavioural differences during host selection between alate virginoparae of generalist and tobacco-specialist Myzus persicae. Entomol Exp Appl 116:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin L. Reeves
    • 1
  • Patrick D. Lorch
    • 1
  • Mark W. Kershner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations