Sexual Approach in the Praying Mantid Mantis Religiosa (L.)
- 467 Downloads
Males of sexually cannibalistic species are thought to express behaviors that reduce the risk of being killed by the females. In several spider species the male modulates his approach to the female as a function of her feeding behavior. We tested this hypothesis in the preying mantid Mantis religiosa (L.). Males were placed behind perching females in a laboratory arena and their position was video-recorded. Females were presented with a prey item (prey-presentation period) and then either they were allowed to capture and eat the prey (“P” treatment), or the prey was removed before the female could capture it (“NP” treatment). For the next 10 min (between-prey-presentation period) the females ate the prey (P), or perched without moving (NP). Total speed of approach of males was over 6-times higher in the P treatment (2.3 cm/min) than in the NP treatment (0.4 cm/min). Speed in the prey-presentation period was higher in P than in NP (4.4 cm/min and 1.3 cm/min, respectively), which shows that seeing a female striking and/or grasping the prey in itself stimulated faster male approach. Approach speed in the between-prey presentation period was also higher in P than in NP (1.9 cm/min and 0.2 cm/min, respectively), which indicates that seeing a female feeding on the prey and/or cleaning her forelegs also stimulates male approach. We conclude that males of M. religiosa can assess the activity state of the females and respond to this information by modulating their speed of approach, probably reducing the risk of being detected and possibly cannibalized.
KEY WORDSMantis religiosa sexual cannibalism mating behavior
We thank F. Fabritius, N. Fabritius and J. Dasca for collecting mantids, R. Vaquera for technical help, D. Casado for his helpful observations during the early stages of the study, and M. Maxwell and J. Moya-Laraño for discussion of an early version of the manuscript. This research is funded in part by a Ramón y Cajal grant from the MCYT of Spain to C.G.
- Barrows, E. M. (1984). Perch sites and food of adult Chinese mantis (Dictyoptera: Mantidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 86: 898–901.Google Scholar
- Elgar, M. A. (1992). Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates. In Elgar, M. A. and Crespi, B. J. (eds.), Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution among Diverse Taxa, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 129–155.Google Scholar
- Hurd, L. E. (1999). Ecology of preying mantids. In Prete, F. E., Wells, H., Wells, P., and Hurd, L. E. (eds.), The Praying Mantids, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
- Liske, E., and Mohren, W. (1984). Saccadic head movements of the praying mantis, with particular reference to visual and propioreceptive information. Physiol. Entomol. 9: 29–38.Google Scholar
- Liske, E., and Davis, W. J. (1987). Courtship and mating behaviour of the Chinese praying mantis. Tenodera aridifolia sinensis. Anim. Behav. 35: 1524–1537.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, M. R. (1999a). Mating behavior. In Prete, F. E., Wells, H., Wells, P., and Hurd, L. E. (eds.), The Praying Mantids, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, pp. 69–89.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, M. R. (1999b). The risk of cannibalism and male mating behaviour in the mediterranean praying mantid. Iris oratoria. Behaviour 136: 205–219.Google Scholar
- Prete, F. R. and Hamilton, K. (1999). Prey capture. In Prete, F. E., Wells, H., Wells, P., and Hurd, L. E. (eds.), The Praying Mantids, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, pp. 194–223.Google Scholar
- Roeder, K. D. (1935). An experimental analysis of the sexual behaviour of the preying mantis (Mantis religiosa L.). Biol. Bull. 69: 203–220.Google Scholar
- SAS Institute (2000). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
- Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry, Freeman, New York.Google Scholar