Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 19–24 | Cite as

The Leaf-Cutting ant Atta Sexdens rubropilosa, FOREL, 1908 Prefers Drier Chambers for Garbage Disposal

  • Pedro Leite Ribeiro
  • Carlos A. Navas
Article

Leave cutting ants rely on a fungus garden as their main food supply. This garden produces debris that must be disposed by workers, as it may favor the contamination of the fungus. We assumed that the growth of undesired microorganisms on garbage would increase with humidity, therefore drier areas should be more suitable for garbage disposal. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that leave-cutting ants Atta sexdens rubropilosa choose drier chambers for garbage disposal. We found that 30 out of 30 sub-colonies tested for hygropreference chose drier chambers for garbage disposal when offered a choice between dry (RH=25±5% SD) and humid (RH=95±5% SD) chambers.

KEY WORDS:

Atta; leaf-cutting ants humidity microclimate garbage 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial support was offered by FAPESP- (The state of São Paulo Science Foundation, 03-01577-8). Thanks are due to Adam G. Hart for his helpful comments and suggestions.

REFERENCES

  1. Autuori, M. (1942). Contribuição para o conhecimento da saúva (Atta spp.—Hymenoptera-Formicidae). III-Escavação de um sauveiro (Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel, 1908). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, São Paulo 13: 137–148.Google Scholar
  2. Bot, A. N. M., Currie, C. R., Hart, A. G., and Boomsma J. J. (2001). Waste management in leaf-cutting ants. Ethol. Ecol. & Evol. 13: 225–237.Google Scholar
  3. Currie, C. R., Mueller, U. G., and Malloch, D. (1999). The agricultural pathology of ant fungus gardens. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96(14): 7998–8002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hart, A. G., and Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2001). Task partitioning division of labour and nest compartmentalization collectivelly isolate hazardous waste in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hart, A. G., Bot, A. N. M., and Brown, M. J. F. (2002). A colony-level response to disease control in a leaf-cutting ant. Naturwissenschaften 89: 275–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1994). Journey to the ants. Library of Congress Cataloging in-Publication Data. USA, 228 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990). The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 732 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Kleineidam, C., and Roces, F. (2000). Carbon dioxide concentrations and nest ventilation in nests of the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Insect. Soc. 47: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leite, P. R. G., and Cunha, W. H. A. (1985). Construção com depósitos de detritos pela saúva (Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel, 1908): fatores desencadeantes e provável função. Ciência e Cultura. (Resumos) 37 n° 7.Google Scholar
  10. Mariconi, F. A. M. (1970). As saúvas. Editora Agronômica Ceres, São Paulo, 167 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Roces, F. (1990). Leaf-cutting ants cut fragment sizes in relation to the distance from the nest. Anim. Behav. 40: 1181–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roces, F., and Kleineidam, C. (2000). Humidity preference for fungus culturing by workers of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa. Insect. Soc. 47: 348–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Waller, D. A., and Moser, J. C. (1990). Invertebrate enemies and nest associates of the leaf- cutting ant Atta texana (Buckley) (Formicidae, Attini). In: Vander Meer, R. K., Jaffé, K. and Cedeño, A. (eds.), Applied myrmecology: a world perspective. Boulder, Westview Press. pp. 255–273.Google Scholar
  14. Wilson, E. O. (1968). The ergonomics of caste in the social insects. American Naturalist 102: 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zeh, J. A., Zeh, A. D., and Zeh, D. W. (1999). Dump material as an effective small-scale deterrent to herbivory by Atta cephalotes. Biotropica 31(2): 368–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de BiociênciasUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations