Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 105–114

Absence of Food Aversion Learning in the Polyphagous Noctuid, Spodoptera litura (F.) Following Intoxication by Deleterious Chemicals

Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether the presence of a deleterious chemical in a preferred host plant could alter the feeding preference of a polyphagous insect. The preference of the Asian armyworm, Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) for castor, Ricinus communis (L.)(family: Euphorbiaceae) relative to cabbage, Brassica oleracea (L.) (family: Brassicaceae) was quantified by two separate two-way choice tests (without treatment and with treatment of the test chemicals used in the present study) with naive third instar larvae each time. This was followed, by continuous feeding (48 h) on the preferred host treated with the test chemicals and using naive third instar larvae for conditioning. Each treatment consisted of one of nine compounds, including seven naturally occurring allelochemicals (viz. (−)-β-pinene, (−)-β-pinene, β-myrcene, {D}-limonene, cineole, rutin, and ajwain oil) and two synthetic insecticides (viz. alphamethrin and malathion). Following this, a two-way choice test was repeated with the same batch of larvae without any test chemical. Larvae continued to maintain preference for castor despite exposure to the deleterious chemicals. Among the test chemicals, {D}-limonene and alphamethrin caused significant reduction in growth. Preference for castor was not overcome by exposure to novel deleterious chemicals, suggesting that aversion, though experienced is not learned.

polyphagy deleterious chemicals preference aversion learning Spodoptera litura 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behmer, S. T., and Elias, D. D. (1999). Phytosterol structure as a basis of food aversion learning in the grass hopper Schistocerca americana (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Physiol. Entomol. 24: 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behmer, S. T., Elias, D. D., and Bernays, E. A. (1999). Post -ingestive feedbacks and associative learning regulate the intake of unsuitable sterols in a generalist grasshopper. J. Exp. Biol. 202: 739–748.Google Scholar
  3. Berenbaum, M. R. (1991). Comparative allelochemical processing in the Papillionidae (Lepidoptera). Arch. Insect. Biochem. Physiol. 17: 213–221.Google Scholar
  4. Bernays, E. A., and Lee, J. C. (1988). Food aversion learning in the phytophagous grasshopper Schistocerca americana. Physiol. Entomol. 13: 131–137.Google Scholar
  5. Bernays, E. A., and Weiss, M. R. (1996). Induced food preferences in caterpillars: The need to identify mechanisms. Entomol. Exp. Applic. 78: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dethier, V. G. (1980). Food -aversion learning in two polyphagous caterpillars, Diacrisia virginica and Estigmene congrua. Physiol. Entomol. 5: 321–325.Google Scholar
  7. Dethier, V. G. (1988). Induction and aversion-learning in polyphagous arctiid larvae (Lepidoptera) in an ecological setting. Can. Entomol. 120: 125–131.Google Scholar
  8. Dethier, V. G., and Yost, M. T. (1979). Oligophagy and absence of food-aversion learning in tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Physiol. Entomol. 4: 125–130.Google Scholar
  9. Gelperin, A. (1975). Rapid food-aversion learning by a terrestrial mollusk. Science 189: 567–570.Google Scholar
  10. Gelperin, A., and Forsythe, D. (1975). Neuroethological studies of learning in mollusks. In Fentress, J. C. (ed.), Simpler Networks and Behavior, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 239–250.Google Scholar
  11. Ghumare, S. S., Mukherjee, S. N., and Sharma, R. N. (1989). Effect of rutin on the neonate sensitivity, dietary utilization and mid-gut carboxylesterase activity of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 98: 399–404.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, J. C., and Bernays, E. A. (1990). Food tastes and toxic effects: Associative learning by the polyphagous grasshopper Schistocerca americana (Drury) (Orthoptera:Acrididae). Anim. Behav. 39: 163–173.Google Scholar
  13. Lindroth, R. L. (1991). Differential toxicity of plant allelochemicals in insects: Roles of enzymatic detoxification systems. In Bernays, E. A. (ed.), Insect-Plant Interactions, Vol. 3, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
  14. Moussa, M. A., Zaher, M. A., and Kotby, F. (1960). Abundance of cotton leafworm, Prodenia litura (F.) in relation to host plants. Host plants and their effect on biology (Lep. Agrotidae-Zenobiinae). Bull. Soc. Entomol., Egypte 44: 241–247.Google Scholar
  15. Mukherjee, S. (2003). Influence of plant allelochemicals on growth rate, nutritional physiology and mid-gut esterase activity in fifth instar larvae of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Invert. Reproduct. Dev. 43: 125–132.Google Scholar
  16. Nagarkatti, S., and Prakash, S. (1974). Rearing Heliothis armigera (Hubn.) on an artificial diet. Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Contr., Tech. Bull. 17: 169–173.Google Scholar
  17. Potter, D.A., and Held, D. (1999). Absence of food-aversion learning by a polyphagous scarab, Popilliajaponica, following intoxication by geranium, Pelargonium x hortorum. Entomol. Exp. Applic. 91: 83–88.Google Scholar
  18. Ratcliffe, J. M., Fenton, M. B., and Galef, B. G., Jr. (2003). An exception to the rule: Common vampire bats do not learn taste aversions. Anim. Behav. 65: 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. M. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 481 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Szentesi, A., and Jenny, T. (1990). The role of experience in host plants choice by phytophagous insects. In Bernays, E. A. (ed.), Insect/Plant Interaction, Vol. II, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 39–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Entomology LaboratoryNational Chemical Laboratory (CSIR)PuneIndia

Personalised recommendations