Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 77–91

Detection and Avoidance of Fish Predators by Adult Enallagma Damselflies

  • Merrylee Ann McGuffin
  • Robert L. Baker
  • Mark R. Forbes
Article

Reproductive success of iteroparous insects depends on their own survival as well as that of their offspring and thus adults should consider risk of predation to both themselves and their offspring when selecting a suitable place to lay eggs. We surveyed species composition of Enallagma damselflies from sites in eastern Ontario and found that, similar to studies in Michigan, USA, Enallagma boreale does not co-exist with fish, whereas E. signatum is apparently restricted to sites with fish. E. ebrium is found at fish and fishless sites. Laboratory experiments on these species showed no effect of chemical cues of fish presence on propensity to oviposit or number of eggs released. By using field enclosures, we found adult E. ebrium could detect and avoid fish during visits to a site, but females visiting fish sites did not significantly reduce oviposition duration.

KEY WORDS:

Zygoptera Enallagma habitat selection oviposition predator detection 

REFERENCES

  1. Baker, R. L. (1989). Condition and size of damselflies: A field study of food limitation. Oecologia 81: 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binckley, C. A., and Resetarits, W. J., Jr. (2002). Reproductive decisions under threat of predation: Squirrel treefrog (Hyla squirella) responses to banded sunfish (Enneacanthus obesus). Oecologia 130: 157–161.Google Scholar
  3. Blaustein, L., Kiflawi, M., Eitam, A., Mangel, M., and Cohen, J. E. (2004). Oviposition habitat selection in response to risk of predation in temporary pools: Mode of detection and consistency across experimental venue. Oecologia 138: 300–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corbet, P. S. (1999). Dragonflies: Behavior and Ecology of Odonata, Comstock, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  5. Forbes, M. R., Richardson, J. M. L., and Baker, R. L. (1995). Frequency of female morphs is related to an index of male density in the damselfly, Nehalennia irene (Hagen). Ecoscience 2: 28–33.Google Scholar
  6. Fraser, D. F., and Huntingford, F. A. (1986). Feeding and avoiding predation hazard: The behavioral response of the prey. Ethology 73: 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerrish, N. L. (1980). Some aspects of the selection of Odonata host species by Arrenurus water mites (Acari, Hydrachnellae) in Lake Opinicon, Ontario, MSc Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  8. Hopey, M. E., and Petranka, J. W. (1994). Restriction of wood frogs to fish-free habitats: How important is adult choice? Copeia 1994(4): 1023–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, D. M., and Crowley, P. H. (1980). Habitat and seasonal segregation among coexisting odonate larvae. Odonatologica 9: 297–308.Google Scholar
  10. Manly, B. F. J. (1991). Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  11. McPeek, M. A. (1989). Differential dispersal tendencies among Enallagma damselflies (Odonata) inhabiting different habitats. Oikos 56: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McPeek, M. A. (1990a). Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71: 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McPeek, M. A. (1990b). Behavioral differences between Enallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators. Ecology 71: 1714–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petranka, J. W., and Fakhoury, K. (1991). Evidence of a chemically-mediated avoidance response of ovipositing insects to blue-gills and green frog tadpoles. Copeia 1991(1): 234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pierce, C. L., Crowley, P. H., and Johnson, D. M. (1985). Behavior and ecological interactions of larval odonata. Ecology 66: 1504–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rehfeldt, G. E. (1990). Anti-predator strategies in oviposition site selection of Pyrrhosoma nymphula (Zygoptera: Odonata). Oecologica 85: 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Resetarits, W. J., Jr. (2001). Colonization under threat of predation: Avoidance of fish by an aquatic beetle, Tropisternus lateralis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Oecologia 129: 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stoks, R., and McPeek, M. A. (2003). Predators and life histories shape Lestes damselfly assemblages along a freshwater habitat gradient. Ecology 84: 1576–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Waage, J. K. (1987). Choice and utilization of oviposition sites by female Calopteryx maculata (Odoanta: Calopterygidae): Influence of site size and the presence of other females. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Walker, E. M. (1953). The Odonata of Canada and Alaska, Vol. 1, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Wilkinson, L. (1989). SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, Systat Inc., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, D. J., and Lefcort, H. (1993). The effect of predator diet on the alarm response of red-legged frog, Rana aurora, tadpoles. Anim. Behav. 46: 1017–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  24. Zeiss, C., Martens, A., and Rolff, J. (1999). Male mate guarding increases females’ predation risk? A case study on tandem oviposition in the damselfly Coenagrion puella (Insecta: Odonata). Can. J. Zool. 77: 1013–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merrylee Ann McGuffin
    • 1
  • Robert L. Baker
    • 1
    • 3
  • Mark R. Forbes
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations