Preparation of Garnet-Type Li7 − 3xAlxLa3Zr2O12 at Lower Temperature by Using Powders of Mixed Pre-treatment Conditions

  • Xiaojuan LuEmail author
  • Dongyu Yang


Garnet-type Li7 − 3xAlxLa3Zr2O12 (x = 0.2) made of different ratios of powders with mixed pre-treatment conditions is prepared by using a microwave oven. Cubic crystallographic structure is successfully achieved after sintered at 1150 °C for only 30 min, which is much lower than the conventional sintering. The conductivity of the samples, which peaked at 60% of powders treated at higher temperature, is comparable to the ones made at much higher temperature with longer dwelling time in literatures. The comparable conductivity was attributed to the denser microstructure and lower activation energy owing to the effect of powers with mixed pre-treatment conditions. The trend of the conductivity versus the ratio of powders with mixed pre-treatment conditions fit well with the percolation model of dispersed ionic conductors. Therefore, powders with mixed pre-treatment conditions could be used as precursors to prepare lithium ion conductors at lower temperatures with less dwelling time, which is beneficial to retaining lithium stoichiometry and any other problems associated with high-temperature procedure.


Lithium conductors Microwave Percolation model Garnet 



This research was financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (No. E2018502014), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2017MS138) and the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    P. Knauth, Inorganic solid Li ion conductors: an overview. Solid State Ion. 180, 911–916 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.A. Lineva, S.D. Kobylyanskaya, L.L. Kovalenko, O.I. V’yunov, A.G. Belous, Effect of impurities on the electrical properties of the defect perovskite Li0.33La0.57TiO3. Inorg. Mater. 53, 326–332 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Cui, M.M. Mahmoud, M. Rohde, C. Ziebert, H.J. Seifert, Thermal and ionic conductivity studies of lithium aluminum germanium phosphate solid-state electrolyte. Solid State Ion. 289, 125–132 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Hupfer, E.C. Bucharsky, K.G. Schell, A. Senyshyn, M. Monchak, M.J. Hoffmann, H. Ehrenberg, Evolution of microstructure and its relation to ionic conductivity in Li1 + xAlxTi2 – x(PO4)3. Solid State Ion. 288, 235–239 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Ramaswamy, T. Venkataraman, W. Weppner, Fast lithium ion conduction in garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 7778–7781 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.A. Geiger, E. Alekseev, B. Lazic, M. Fisch, T. Armbruster, R. Langner, M. Fechtelkord, N. Kim, T. Pettke, W. Weppner, Crystal chemistry and stability of “Li7La3Zr2O12” garnet: a fast lithium-ion conductor. Inorg. Chem. 50, 1089–1097 (2011)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. Tong, V. Thangadurai, E.D. Wachsman, Highly conductive Li garnets by a multielement doping strategy. Inorg. Chem. 54, 3600–3607 (2015)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Rettenwander, C.A. Geiger, G. Amthauer, Synthesis and crystal chemistry of the fast Li-ion conductor Li7La3Zr2O12 doped with Fe. Inorg. Chem. 52, 8005–8009 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Rettenwander, G. Redhammer, F. Preishuber-Pflügl, L. Cheng, L. Miara, R. Wagner, A. Welzl, E. Suard, M.M. Doeff, M. Wilkening, J. Fleig, G. Amthauer, Structural and electrochemical consequences of Al and Ga cosubstitution in Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 28, 2384–2392 (2016)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Luo, Y. Gong, Y. Zhu, K.K. Fu, J. Dai, S.D. Lacey, C. Wang, B. Liu, X. Han, Y. Mo, E.D. Wachsman, L. Hu, Transition from super lithiophobicity to super lithiophilicity of garnet solid-state electrolyte. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 12258–12262 (2016)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.E. Roman, A continuum percolation model for dispersed ionic conductors. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2, 3909–3917 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Albinet, J.M. Debierre, P. Knauth, C. Lambert, L. Raymond, Enhanced conductivity in ionic conductor–insulator composites: numerical models in two and three dimensions. Eur. Phys. J. B 22, 421–427 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Bernuy-Lopez, W. Manalastas, J.M. Lopez del Amo, A. Aguadero, F. Aguesse, J.A. Kilner, Atmosphere controlled processing of Ga-substituted garnets for high Li-ion conductivity ceramics. Chem. Mater. 26, 3610–3617 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. El Shinawi, J. Janek, Stabilization of cubic lithium-stuffed garnets of the type “Li7La3Zr2O12” by addition of gallium. J. Power Sources 225, 13–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Afyon, F. Krumeich, J.L.M. Rupp, A shortcut to garnet-type fast Li-ion conductors for all-solid state batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 18636–18648 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    X. Lu, D. Yang, Effect of sintering conditions on perovskite lithium-based ion conductor. Emerg. Mater. Res. 6, 1–5 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringNorth China Electric Power UniversityBaodingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations