Gentamicin Loaded Zn2(bdc)2(dabco) Frameworks as Efficient Materials for Drug Delivery and Antibacterial Activity

Article
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

New drug delivery systems are very helpful in diagnosis and treatment of diseases through controlled and targeted drug delivery. They can increase bioavailability of drugs and reduce their side effects. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are alternative drug delivery systems, which are suitable for targeted drug delivery due to their adjustable pore sizes and compatibility by adding some functional groups. Application of these compounds permits simultaneous use of several advantages including biocompatibility, the ability to absorb large amounts of drugs and control drug release. The present study was designed to provide Zn2(bdc)2(dabco) MOF and evaluate its performance in absorbing and releasing gentamicin. Characterization methods, such as FTIR, XRD, SEM, BET, UV–Vis spectroscopy and TGA, were employed to characterize the gentamicin-loaded Zn2(bdc)2(dabco) structure. The amount of drug release from Zn2(bdc)2(dabco) was measured in buffer solutions with 7.4 and 5.0 pHs. Furthermore, antibacterial properties of the drug, MOF and drug-loaded MOF have been investigated against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. This study shows the potential of using Zn2(bdc)2(dabco) frameworks for controlled release of antibiotic drugs.

Keywords

Frameworks Drug delivery Antibacterial activity Antibiotic drugs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been financially supported by Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University under the grant number 96/603.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Peer et al., Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 751–760 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Couvreur, R. Gref, K. Andrieux, C. Malvy, Nanotechnology for drug delivery: applications to cancer and autoimmune diseases. Prog. Solid State Chem. 34, 231–235 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Gref et al., Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science 263, 1600–1603 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Gabizon, Stealth liposomes and tumor targeting: one step further in the quest for the magic bullet. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 223–225 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Sheikh Hasan et al., Effect of the microencapsulation of nanoparticles on the reduction of burst release. Int. J. Pharm. 344, 53–61 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Nabipour, M. Hossaini Sadr, Layered zinc hydroxide-ibuprofen nanohybrids: synthesis and characterization. Bull. Mater. Sci. 38(6), 1561–1568 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Nabipour, M. Hossaini Sadr, N. Thomas, Synthesis, controlled release and antibacterial studies of nalidixic acid-zinc hydroxide nitrate nanocomposites. New J. Chem. 40, 238–244 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Nabipour, M. Hossaini Sadr, B. Soltani, Synthesis, identification and in vitro drug release of layered zinc hydroxide-gemifloxacin nanohybrids. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem 85(3), 261–269 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Nabipour, M. Hossaini Sadr, Controlled release of diclofenac, an anti-inflammatory drug by nanocompositing with layered zinc hydroxide. J. Porous Mater. 22, 447 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Nabipour, M. Hossaini Sadr, N. Thomas, Synthesis, characterisation and sustained release properties of layered zinc hydroxide intercalated with amoxicillin trihydrate. J. Exp. Nanosci. 10(16), 1269–1284 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Soltani, H. Nabipour, N. Ahmadi Nasab, Fabrication, controlled release and kinetic studies of indomethacin—layered zinc hydroxide nanohybrid and its effect on viability of HFFF2. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2017.1388178 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Hassan, E. Haque, K.R. Reddy, A.I. Minett, J. Chen, V.G. Gomes, Edge-enriched graphene quantum dots for enhanced photo-luminescence and supercapacitance. Nanoscale 6, 11988–11994 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Kakarla Raghava, G.G. Vincent, H. Mahbub, Carbon functionalized TiO2 nanofibers for high efficiency photocatalysis. Mater. Res. Express 1, 015012 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K.R. Reddy, M. Hassan, V.G. Gomes, Hybrid nanostructures based on titanium dioxide for enhanced photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. A 489, 1–16 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K.R. Reddy, K.-P. Lee, A.I. Gopalan, Self-assembly directed synthesis of poly (ortho-toluidine)-metal (gold and palladium) composite nanospheres. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 7, 3117–3125 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.R. Reddy, K.-P. Lee, A.I. Gopalan, M.S. Kim, A.M. Showkat, Y.C. Nho, Synthesis of metal (Fe or Pd)/alloy (Fe–Pd)-nanoparticles-embedded multiwall carbon nanotube/sulfonated polyaniline composites by γ irradiation. J. Polym. Sci. A 44, 3355–3364 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M.L. Hu, V. Safarifard, E. Doustkhah, S. Rostamnia, A. Morsali, N. Nouruzi, S. Beheshti, K. Akhbari, Taking organic reactions over metal-organic frameworks as heterogeneous catalysis. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 256, 111–127 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Rostamnia, H. Alamgholiloo, M. Jafari, R. Rookhosh, A.R. Abbasi, Synthesis and catalytic study of open metal site metal–organic frameworks of Cu3(BTC)2 microbelts in selective organic sulfide oxidation. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 30, 954–958 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Rostamnia, H. Alamgholiloo, X. Liu, Pd-grafted open metal site copper-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate metal organic frameworks (Cu-BDC MOF’s) as promising interfacial catalysts for sustainable Suzuki coupling. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 469, 310–317 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Rostamnia, H. Hongchuan Xin, Basic isoreticular metal–organic framework (IRMOF-3) porous nanomaterial as a suitable and green catalyst for selective unsymmetrical Hantzschcoupling reaction. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 28, 359–363 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Horcajada et al., Metal–organic frameworks as efficient materials for drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 5974–5978 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Horcajada et al., Flexible porous metal–organic frameworks for a controlled drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6774–6780 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Furukawa, U. Muller, O.M. Yaghi, Heterogeneity within order” in metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3417–3430 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Q. Zhang, J.M. Shreeve, Metal–organic frameworks as high explosives: a new concept for energetic materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 2540–2542 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Nabipour, M. Hossaini Sadr, G. Rezanejad Bardajee, Synthesis and characterization of nanoscale zeolitic imidazolate frameworks with ciprofloxacin and their applications as antimicrobial agents. New J. Chem. 41, 7364–7370 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. Nabipour, M. Hossaini Sadr, Gh. Rezanejad Bardajee. Release behavior, kinetic and antimicrobial study of nalidixic acid from [Zn2(bdc)2(dabco)]metal organic frameworks. J. Coord. Chem. 70, 1–24 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    T. Slattery et al., Graft-rejection and toxicity following bone marrow transplantation in relation to busulfan pharmacokinetics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 16, 31–42 (1995)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Horcajada et al., Porous metal–organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nat. Mater. 9, 172–178 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    I.M.P. Silva et al., Enhanced performance of a metal-organic framework analogue to MIL-101(Cr) containing amine groups for ibuprofen and nimesulide controlled release. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 70, 47–50 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D.N. Dybtsev, H. Chun, K. Kim, Rigid and flexible: a highly porous metal–organic framework with unusual guest-dependent dynamic behavior. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 5033 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. Uemura et al., Two-step adsorption/desorption on a jungle-gym-type porous coordination polymer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 6662 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    N. Motakef-Kazemi, S.A. Shojaosadati, A. Morsali, In situ synthesis of a drug-loaded MOF at room temperature. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 186, 73 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    N. Manjunatha, S. Vasanti, N. Rajesh, N. Uma, Formulation and evaluation of biopolymer based microspheres for nasal drug delivery. Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2(1), 856 (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    B. Soltani, H. Nabipour, N. Ahamdi Nasab, Efficient storage of gentamicin in nanoscale zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 nanocarrier for pH-responsive drug release. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-017-0745-z Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    A.L. Doadrio, E.M. Sousa, J.C. Doadrio, J. Pérez Pariente, I. Izquierdo-Barba, M. Vallet-Regí, Mesoporous SBA-15 HPLC evaluation for controlled gentamicin drug delivery. J. Control. Release 97(1), 125–132 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Changez, K. Burugapalli, V. Koul, V. Choudhary, The effect of composition of poly(acrylic acid)-gelatin hydrogel on gentamicin sulphate release: in vitro. Biomaterials 24(4), 527–536 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceAzarbaijan Shahid Madani UniversityTabrizIran
  2. 2.Faculty of PharmacyHormozgan University of Medical ScienceBandar AbbasIran

Personalised recommendations