The Effect of Morphology Changes on Polymer Photodegradation Efficiencies: A Study of Time-Dependent Morphology and Stress-Induced Crystallinity

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The effects of time-dependent morphology changes on the photochemical degradation efficiencies of polymers were investigated using the segmented polyurethane 1. A segmented polyurethane was chosen for this study because segmented polyurethanes have distinct hard (crystalline) and soft (amorphous) morphologies in the solid-state. It is known that, as these polymers cure, the hard and soft domains expand in the days and weeks following preparation. Experiments showed that the quantum yields for degradation of thin films of polymer 1 decreased over a period of about 30 days following preparation of the polymer films. Infrared spectroscopy showed an increase in crystallinity in the polymer during this curing period. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the rate of photodegradation in polymer systems is controlled by the separation rate of the photogenerated radical pair relative to the rate of radical-radical recombination (Scheme 3). An important factor that controls the ratio of these two rates is the crystallinity of the polymer; an increase in crystallinity favors the radical-radical recombination reaction. The effect of tensile stress on photodegradation efficiencies was also studied. Two samples of the same polymer, one more crystalline than the other, were examined. The quantum yields for degradation of the more crystalline sample were less affected by tensile stress than the less crystalline sample. Tensile stress is known to order polymer chains and the results are again interpreted as being consistent with the idea that crystallinity is an important factor in controlling the efficiency of polymer photodegradation.

Keywords

Photochemically degradable polymer Metal-metal bond Polymer morphology Cage effect Metal radical 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment is made to the Petroleum Research Fund, administered by the American Chemical Society, and to the National Science Foundation (CHE-0452004) for the support of this research.

References

  1. 1.
    D.R. Tyler, Coord. Chem. Rev. 246, 291 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.C. Daglen, D.R. Tyler, ACS Symp. Ser. 939, 384 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Chen, M. Yoon, A. Smalley et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3054 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B.C. Daglen, J.D. Harris, D.R. Tyler, J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 17, 267 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.C. Tenhaeff, D.R. Tyler, Organometallics 10, 1116 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.C. Tenhaeff, D.R. Tyler, Organometallics 10, 473 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.C. Tenhaeff, D.R. Tyler, Organometallics 11, 1466 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Hepburn, Polyurethane Elastomers (Elsevier Science Publishers, London, 1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.L. Wilkes, S. Bagrodia, W. Humphries et al., J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 13, 321 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.R. White, N.Y. Rapoport, Trends Polym Sci (Cambridge, United Kingdom) 2, 197 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Chen, D.R. Tyler, Macromolecules 37, 5430 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Chen, D.R. Tyler, ACS Symp. Ser. 928, 429 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.A. De Haseth, J.E. Andrews, J.V. McClusky et al., Appl. Spectrosc. 47, 173 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.M. Heintz, D.J. Duffy, C.M. Nelson et al., Macromolecules 38, 9192 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.J. Elwell, A.J. Ryan, H.J.M. Grunbauer et al., Polymer 37, 1353 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.P. Sheth, D.B. Klinedinst, T.W. Pechar et al., Macromolecules 38, 10074 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.M. Vandenbelt, C. Henrich, Appl. Spectrosc. 7, 171 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spectral Database for Organic Compounds SDBS Page. http://riodb01.ibase.aist.go.jp/sdbs/cgi-bin/direct_frame_top.cgi. Accessed Jul 2008
  19. 19.
    J.L. McHale, Molecular Spectroscopy (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G.C.M. Pimentel, A.L. McCellan, The Hydrogen Bond (W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 1960)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Krimm, V.L. Folt, J.J. Shipman et al., J. Poly. Sci. Pt. A 1, 2621 (1963)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Tasumi, T. Shimauouchi, Spectrochimica Acta 17, 731 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry1253 University of OregonEugeneORUSA

Personalised recommendations