A Qualitative Exploration of Somali Refugee Women’s Experiences with Family Planning in the U.S.
The purpose of our study was to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of Somali refugee women with family planning in the U.S. We conducted focus groups of Somali refugee women and used grounded theory methodology to identify emergent themes. Fifty-three women, aged 18–49 years, participated. Somali refugee women’s cultural and religious beliefs and social identities strongly influence their conceptualization of family planning. Participants agreed that a woman’s fertility is ultimately decided by Allah and identified environmental changes after immigration and the desire to optimize maternal health as facilitators to modern contraceptive use. Misconceptions about and fear of side effects of modern contraceptive methods, including a fear of infertility, were identified as barriers to use. To deliver patient-centered family planning counseling to Somali refugee women, it is essential that healthcare providers approach these discussions with cultural humility and consider employing community partners or cultural brokers to help provide family planning education.
KeywordsFamily planning Somali refugees Contraception Birth spacing Qualitative
This study was funded in part by a Research Stimulation Grant (G1502RS) from the American Academy of Family Physicians Foundation and the Society of Family Planning Research Fund (SFPRF9-MC1). The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official position of AAFP Foundation nor the Society of Family Planning Research Fund. We thank Ladna Farah, the Somali Health Board of King County, WA and the University of Washington Family Planning Division for their help with this study.
- 1.Eckstein B. Primary care for refugees. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(4):429–36.Google Scholar
- 2.UNFPA, Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, 5–13 September 1994, New York: UNFPA, 2004, http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/event-pdf/PoA_en.pdf.
- 3.Women’s commission for refugee women and children (WCRWC), refugee women and reproductive health care: reassessing priorities, New York: WCRWC, 1994. https://www.womensrefugeecommission.org/resources/document/583-refugeewomen-and-reproductive-health-care-reassessing-priorities.
- 7.Aptekman M, Rashid M, Wright V, Dunn S. Unmet contraceptive needs among refugees. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can. 2014;60(12):e613–9.Google Scholar
- 8.Newell A, Sullivan A, Halai R, Boag F. Sexually transmitted diseases, cervical cytology and contraception in immigrants and refugees from the former Yugoslavia. Venereology. 1998;11(1):25–7.Google Scholar
- 13.Minkler DH, Korenbrot C, Brindis C. Family planning among Southeast Asian refugees. West J Med. 1988;148(3):349–54.Google Scholar
- 14.Zhang Y, Quist A, Enquobahrie D. Short birth-to-pregnancy intervals among African-born black women in Washington State. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;7:1–7.Google Scholar
- 15.Sonfield A, Hasstedt K, Kavanaugh M, Anderson R. The social and economic benefits of women’s ability to determine whether and when to have children. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.Google Scholar
- 16.Seattle Co. Seattle Immigrant and Refugee Data Sheet. Office of Refugee and Immigrant Affairs 2014; https://www.seattle.gov/iandraffairs/data#snapshot.
- 17.Balk G. What King County’s refugee populations look like: an interactive map. The seattle times. November 19, 2015.Google Scholar
- 18.Refugee Processing Center Report: Arrivals by State and Country as of September 30, 2014. U.S Department of State (DOS) Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM);2014.Google Scholar
- 19.Report to Congress FY 2012 from Office of Refugee Resettlement. Office of Refugee Resettlement: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/orr/fy_2012_orr_report_to_congress_final_041014.pdf.
- 26.Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1988.Google Scholar
- 28.Duran B. Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2003.Google Scholar
- 30.Glaser B. The grounded theory perspective: conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 31.Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
- 32.Corbin JaS A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing; 2015.Google Scholar
- 33.Dedoose Version 7.0.23, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (2016). Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC www.dedoose.com.
- 40.Gold R. ‘I am who I serve’—community health workers in family planning programs. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2010;13(3):8–13.Google Scholar