Tattoo Removal as a Resettlement Service to Reduce Incarceration Among Mexican Migrants
In Mexico, tattooed migrants face discrimination and are at high-risk of incarceration, thus, we assessed whether receiving laser tattoo removal affected the likelihood of incarceration. In 2015–2016, 89 adults ages ≥ 18 years with visible tattoos were recruited at a free-clinic to receive laser tattoo removal or assigned to the wait-list; all completed baseline and 6-month questionnaires. Overall, 97.8% of participants ever migrated to the USA. In multivariate analyses restricted to migrants (n = 87), those receiving laser tattoo removal [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.27, 95% CI 0.07–0.89] and possessing a Mexican Voting card (AOR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03–0.58) were significantly less likely than wait-list participants to be incarcerated at 6-months. Previously incarcerated participants were significantly more likely to be incarcerated at follow-up. Tattoo removal may reduce incarceration among Mexican migrants. Future studies can assess other health and social benefits of tattoo removal for migrants/deportees returning to Mexico.
KeywordsTattoo removal Incarceration Deported migrants Mexico Gang tattoos
We acknowledge funding from the following sources: the UC GloCal Fellowship and the AIDS International Training Research Program funded by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R25TW009343 and D43TW008633 (Ojeda, Pinedo, Ferraiolo), and the National Institute on Mental Health Grant #K01MH095680 (Burgos). Kremer was supported by a Research Fellowship from the UCSD Office of Graduate Studies and Ojeda was supported by a Faculty Fellowship by the UCSD Center for US-Mexican Studies.
- 1.Drazewski P. Tattoo stigma and job discrimination. 2013; Theses and Dissertations. p. 148Google Scholar
- 2.Hawkes D, Senn C, Thorn C. Factors that influence attitudes toward women with tattoos. Sex Roles. 2004;50(9/10):593–604.Google Scholar
- 6.Mc Mahon J, Pouget E, Tortu S. Individual and couple-level risk factors for hepatitis C infection among heterosexual drug users: a multilevel dyadic analysis. J Infectous Dis. 2007;195(11):1572–81.Google Scholar
- 9.Campbell H. Narco-propaganda in the Mexican “drug war”. Lat Am Perspect. 2014;41(2):60–77.Google Scholar
- 10.Kun J, Montezemolo F. Tijuana dreaming: life and art at the global border. Durham: Duke University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- 12.Bazan L, Harris L, Lorentzen L. Migrant gangs, religion and tattoo removal. Peace Rev. 2002;14(4):379–83.Google Scholar
- 13.Herrera E, Jones G, de Benitez ST. Bodies on the line: identity markers among Mexican street youth. Child Geogr. 2009;7(1):37–41.Google Scholar
- 14.Scambler G. Re-framing stigma: felt and enacted stigma and challenges to the sociology of chronic and disabling conditions. Soc Theory Health. 2004;2(1968):29–46.Google Scholar
- 21.National Migration Institute of Mexico. Guía de Procedimiento de Repatriación Al Interior de México. 2018 http://www.inm.gob.mx/static/repatriacion_h/Repatriacion_H.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2018.
- 22.París Pombo MD. Procesos de repatriación. Experiencias de las personas devueltas a México por las autoridades estadounidenses. Tijuana. México: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars-El Colegio de la Frontera Norte; 2010.Google Scholar
- 23.Goffman E. Stigma; notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1963.Google Scholar
- 25.Link B, Phelan J. Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:363–85.Google Scholar
- 26.Brotherton B, Barrios L. Displacement and stigma: the social-psychological crisis of the deportee. Crime Media Cult. 2009;5(1):29–55.Google Scholar
- 27.Hagan J, Eschbach K, Rodriguez N. US deportation policy, family separation, and circular migration. Int Migrat Rev. 2008;42(1):64–88.Google Scholar
- 28.Schuster L, Nassim M. Deportation Stigma and Re-migration. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2015;41(4):635–52.Google Scholar
- 29.Albicker S, Velasco L. Deportación y estigma en la frontera México-Estados Unidos: atrapados en Tijuana. Norteamerica. 2016;11(1):99–129.Google Scholar
- 30.Roman J, Arroyo L, Cotto Gomez Z. Rasgando la Piel: Tatuajes, Cuerpos y Significados. Qual Rep. 2009;14(2):374–88.Google Scholar
- 32.Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries J, Bruce B, Rose M, PROMIS Cooperative Group. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):3–11.Google Scholar
- 33.FDA. 510(k) summary QYAG laser handpiece. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf13/k130250.pdf.
- 34.Martinez N. Reintegrating into society: challenges and successes encountered by ex-offenders; 2009. pp. 1–69.Google Scholar
- 35.Beers K, Collins C, Sanchez-garcia M. Expanding opportunities and erasing barriers: tattoo removal as gang transition strategy. Walla Walla: Withman College; 2014.Google Scholar
- 37.Durose M, Cooper A, Snyder H. Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: patterns from 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: Statistics US Department of Justice; 2014.Google Scholar
- 41.Shader M. Risk factors for delinquency: an overview. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2004. pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
- 45.Gorsic M, Bacak I, Ahcan U, Topcic V. Evaluation of the efficacy of tattoo-removal treatments with Q-Switch laser. J Laser Health Acad. 2013;2013(2):21–6.Google Scholar
- 46.Koikkalainen S, Kyle D. Imagining mobility: the prospective cognition question in migration research. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2015;42(5):759–76.Google Scholar
- 47.Decker S, Pyrooz D, Moule R. Disengagement from gangs as role transitions. J Res Adolesc. 2014;24(2):268–83.Google Scholar
- 48.Pyrooz D, Decker S, Webb V. The ties that bind: desistance from gangs. Crime Delinq. 2010;60:419–516.Google Scholar
- 49.Choi DY, Kiesner F. Homeboy industries: an incubator of hope and businesses: a note to instructors. Entrep Theory Pract. 2007;31(5):787–90.Google Scholar