Cultural Considerations in the Assessment of Survivors of Torture
The cultural and ethnic landscape of North America is becoming increasingly diverse, with many refugees fleeing torture and persecution and seeking safety in the United States and Canada. In working with this population, clinicians must implement culturally appropriate methods of assessing and treating individuals from diverse backgrounds. Culture can exert a powerful and often misunderstood influence on psychological assessment, and the critical challenge is to account for both subjective experience of the client and the objective symptoms or behaviors present. The present review explores the literature on cross-cultural issues in the assessment of survivors of torture. I summarize best practices and review the theoretical and statistical bases for establishing the equivalence of constructs across cultures. Discussion centers around the utility of a cross-culturally valid measure of distress, and it is hoped that this review will encourage collaboration between clinicians and psychometricians to develop assessments for use with this vulnerable population.
KeywordsRefugees Cross-cultural assessment Torture Measurement invariance
The author would like to thank Dr. Barry Rosenfeld and Dr. Andrew Rasmussen, as well as Priyadarshiny Sandanapitchai, for their assistance developing and preparing this manuscript.
- 1.Akinsulure-Smith A. The use of interpreters with survivors of war, torture & refugee trauma. In: Smith H, Keller A, Lhewa D, editors. “Like a refugee camp on first avenue”: insights and experiences from the Bellevue/NYU program for survivors of torture. New York: The Jacob and Valeria Langeloth Foundation; 2007. pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
- 2.Allen J, Walsh JA. A construct-based approach to equivalence: methodologies for cross-cultural/multicultural personality assessment research. In: Handbook of cross-cultural and multicultural personality assessment. London: Routledge; 2000. pp. 63–85.Google Scholar
- 3.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
- 4.Amnesty International. Amnesty International Report 2016: the state of the world’s human rights. London: Amnesty International Publications; 2016.Google Scholar
- 12.Briere J. Trauma symptom inventory-2 professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2011.Google Scholar
- 13.Brown T. Uses of confirmatory factor analysis. In: Brown T editor. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford; 2006. pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
- 18.Dana R. Handbook of cross cultural and multicultural personality assessment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.Google Scholar
- 21.Drapeau A, Marchand A, Beaulieu-Prévost D. (2012). Epidemiology of psychological distress. In: Mental illnesses-understanding, prediction and control. InTech, RijekaGoogle Scholar
- 28.Haroz EE, Bass J, Lee C, Oo SS, Lin K, Kohrt B, Michalopolous L, Nguyen AJ, Bolton P. Development and cross-cultural testing of the International Depression Symptom Scale (IDSS): a measurement instrument designed to represent global presentations of depression. Glob Ment Health. 2017;4:e17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims. (2017). The reach of our work. Retrieved from: http://www.irct.org/about-us/the-difference-we-make/the-reach-of-our-work.aspx.
- 35.Jacobs E, Lauderdale D, Meltzer D, Shorey J, Levinson W, Thisted R. Impact of interpreter services on delivery of health care to limited English-proficient patients. J Gen Int Med. 2001;16(7):468–74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007468.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Migration Policy Institute. (2017). Global immigration trends. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org.
- 44.Mitrushina M, Boone K, Razani J, D’Elia L. Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- 45.Mollica R, Donelan K, Tor S, Lavalle J, Elias C, Frankel M, et al. The effect of trauma and confinement on functional health and mental health status of Cambodians living in Thailand-Cambodia border camps. JAMA 1993;270:581–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510050047025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Okawa J. Considerations for the cross-cultural evaluation of refugees and asylum seekers. In: Suzuki L, Ponterotto J, editors. Handbook of multicultural assessment: clinical, psychological and educational applications. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008. pp. 165–95.Google Scholar
- 55.Ridley C, Tracy M, Pruitt-Stephens L, Wimsatt M, Beard J. Multicultural assessment validity: the preeminent ethical issue in psychological assessment. In: Suzuki L, Ponterotto J, editors. Handbook of multicultural assessment: clinical, psychological and educational applications. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008. pp. 22–33.Google Scholar
- 63.Tanzer NK, Sim CQE, Marsh HW. Test applications over cultures and languages: theoretical considerations and empirical findings. Bull Int Test Comm. 1992;19:151–71.Google Scholar
- 64.United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees. Convention relating to the status of refugees. Geneva: UNHCR Publications; 1967.Google Scholar