Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Comparison of Risk Factors and Prevalence in Native and Migrant Mothers of Portuguese Generation XXI Birth Cohort
- 153 Downloads
Epidemiological studies report conflicting findings regarding association between maternal immigration status and pregnancy outcomes. In this study we compared risk factors and prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in native Portuguese and migrants. Cross-sectional analysis was conducted using information collected at delivery from the participants of Generation XXI birth cohort. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess the association between migrant status and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Prevalence of risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes varied between native Portuguese and migrants: teenage mothers (5.6 and 2.0%), primiparae (57.1 and 63.9%), smoking during pregnancy (23.0 and 19.1%), twins (3.2 and 8.0%), and caesarean section (35.2 and 45.7%). Among singleton births, prevalence of low birthweight, preterm birth and small for gestational age were 7.3 and 3.9%, 7.5 and 6.2%, and 15.1 and 7.6%, respectively for native Portuguese and migrants. The native Portuguese had an adjusted significantly higher risk of low birthweight (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.30, 5.48) and small for gestational age (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.26, 3.21), but a similar risk for preterm birth (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.81, 2, 34). Migrant mothers presented a lower risk of low birthweight and small for gestation and data suggest a healthy immigrant effect.
KeywordsMigrants Portuguese Risk factors Adverse pregnancy outcomes
The authors also wish to express their gratitude to the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology for supporting their institution, the Epidemiology Research Unit of Institute of Public Health University of Porto (UID/DTP/04750/2013), and specific Grant awards (SFRH/BPD/75918/2011, PTDC/DTPSAP/ 6384/2014 and SFRH/BSAB/113778/2015).
HB was responsible for the design and assembling of Generation XXI birth cohort. MK and HB conceived and designed the study and analysis. MK, SC and HB prepared the datasets and analysed the data. MK drafted the manuscript. HB reviewed, edited and revised the manuscript as well as supervised all the processes. All authors interpreted data and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. Finally, all the authors read and approved the final version.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 6.Keygnaert I, Ivanova O, Guieu A, Van Parys AS, Leye E, Roelens K. What is the evidence on the reduction of inequalities in accessibility and quality of maternal health care delivery for migrants? A review of the existing evidence in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
- 22.Beck LF, Morrow B, Lipscomb LE, Johnson CH, Gaffield ME, Rogers M, Gilbert BC. Prevalence of selected maternal behaviors and experiences, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries (Washington, DC: 2002). 2002;51(2):1–27.Google Scholar
- 28.Larsen PS, Kamper-Jorgensen M, Adamson A, Barros H, Bonde JP, Brescianini S, Brophy S, Casas M, Charles MA, Devereux G, et al. Pregnancy and birth cohort resources in europe: a large opportunity for aetiological child health research. Paediatric Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27(4):393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. (0042-9686 (Print)).Google Scholar
- 34.Sobotka T, Zemen K, Lesthaeghe R, Frejka T, Neels K. Postponement and recuperation in cohort fertility: Austria, Germany and Switzerland in a European Context. Comp Popul Studies. 2011;36(2–3):417–52.Google Scholar
- 35.Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663–737.Google Scholar
- 37.Nair M, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M. Establishing a national maternal morbidity outcome indicator in England: a population-based study using routine hospital data. (1932–6203 (Electronic)).Google Scholar
- 39.Braveman PA. Monitoring equity in health and healthcare: a conceptual framework. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003;21(3):181–92.Google Scholar
- 41.Lindsay AC, Wallington SF, Greaney ML, Hasselman MH, Tavares Machado MM, Mezzavilla RS. Brazilian immigrant mothers’ beliefs and practices related to infant feeding: a qualitative study. J Human Lact. 2016;33(3):595–605.Google Scholar
- 42.Kramer MS. The epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes: an overview. J Nutr. 2003;133(5 Suppl 2):1592s–6s.Google Scholar