We examine the access that culturally diverse migrant groups in Australia have to different sources of social support and how this access, or lack thereof, is associated with psychological flourishing and distress. A national online survey was conducted with 1334 migrants in Australia, examining 11 different sources of social support, including family, friends, relationship partner, acquaintances, work colleagues, health professionals, government agencies, community organisations, religious groups, social groups and online groups. We also examined migrants from different cultural groups. All sources of support were significantly associated with mental health, but somewhat differently for the dimensions of distress and flourishing. Flourishing was linked to higher support from all 11 sources, though not for all cultural groups. High psychological distress was linked to lower support only from family, friends, a partner, acquaintances, work colleagues and social groups, and only for some cultural groups. In particular, for distress, there was no link between migrants from Southern Asia and family support, as well as Confucian Asia groups and friend support. Understanding where migrants from different cultural origins draw their support from could help policymakers and support workers improve health and well-being in migrant populations, especially by focusing on sources of support that are linked to lower distress and greater flourishing, as indicated in this study.
Social support Migrants Flourishing Distress Mental health
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Eppsteiner H, Hagan J Religion as psychological, spiritual, and social support in the migration undertaking. Intersections of religion and migration. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; 2016.Google Scholar
Hendrickson B, Rosen D, Aune RK. An analysis of friendship networks, social connectedness, homesickness, and satisfaction levels of international students. Int J Intercult Relations. 2011;35:281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassatelli M. The shaping of a European cultural identity through EU cultural policy. Eur J Soc Theory. 2002;5:435–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott WA, Scott R. Adaptation of immigrants: individual differences and determinants. In: Argyle M, editor. Volume 18 of International series in experimental social psychology. Dordrecht: Elsevier; 2013. p. 227.Google Scholar