Advertisement

Changing Mammography-Related Beliefs Among American Muslim Women: Findings from a Religiously-Tailored Mosque-Based Intervention

  • Aasim I. PadelaEmail author
  • Sana Malik
  • Hena Din
  • Stephen Hall
  • Michael Quinn
Original Paper
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Background To advance the literature on religiously-tailored interventions and on Muslim cancer screening disparity research, we report on a behavioral intervention that used religiously-tailored messages to address salient mammography-related barrier beliefs. Methods We crafted specific, religiously-tailored messages and designed a two-session, peer-led, mosque-based educational program to deploy them. t-tests assessed pre- and post-intervention changes in mammography knowledge, intention to obtain mammography, and levels of agreement with mammography-related barrier and facilitator beliefs, while ordered logistic regression models assessed predictors of change. Results 58 women participated, 29 who were South-Asian and 18 Arab. Mean mammography knowledge increased post-intervention. Participants’ overall mean agreement with facilitator beliefs trended upward and there was a significant decrease in agreement with the belief "Breast Cancer Screening is not important because God decides who will get cancer," Discussion Religiously-tailored messages provide an opportunity for addressing barriers to preventive health in a theologically consonant way.

Keywords

Islam Faith-based interventions Cancer disparities Community-based participatory research 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A Mentored Research Scholar Grant in Applied and Clinical Research, MRSG-14-032-01-CPPB from the American Cancer Society supported AIP’s time-effort, the time-effort of SM and SH, and project funds. We are grateful for the many efforts of our research assistants: Shaheen Nageeb, Akila Ally, Hadiyah Muhammad, Milkie Vu, and Ahamed Milhan. Finally, we acknowledge the critical support of community advisory board members, imams, mosque staff, peer educators, and lecturers: Fatema Mirza, Nancy Romanchek, Shehla Diba, Anam Eljabali, MahRukh Mian, Dr. Rabia Bhatti, Kay Metres, Nancy Amicangelo, Tamara Gray, Dr. Rania Awaad, Kifah Shukair, Masood Iqbal, Luma Mahairi, Lynn Salahi, Beenish Manzoor, Ayesha Sultana, Shaykh Kifah Mustapha, Mufti Nazim Mangera, Kamran Hussain, Amanat Ansari, Ali Tai, Lila Zegar, Rula Zegar, Aisha Rahima, Badie Ali, and Elham Atieh.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Shirazi M, et al. Targeting and tailoring health communications in breast screening interventions. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015;9(Suppl):83–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kreuter MW, et al. Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30(2):133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pasick RJ. Response to Kreuter and Skinner: consensus regarding use of the terms targeting and tailoring. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(4):503–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pasick RJ, D’onofrio CN, Otero-Sabogal R, Similarities and differences across cultures: questions to inform a third generation for health promotion research. Health Educ Behav. 1996. 23(Suppl 1):142–161.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kreuter M, et al. Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30(2):133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kreuter M, Wary R. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(3):S227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holt CL, Lee C, Wright K. A spiritually based approach to breast cancer awareness: cognitive response analysis of communication effectiveness. Health Commun. 2008;23(1):13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang Y, Shen F. Effects of cultural tailoring on persuasion in cancer communication: a meta-analysis. J Commun. 2016;66(4):694–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salman KF, Health beliefs and practices related to cancer screening among Arab Muslim women in an Urban community. Health Care Women Int. 2012. 33(1):45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levin J, Chatters LM, Taylor RJ. Religion, health and medicine in African Americans: implications for physicians. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(2):237–49.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olphen J, et al. Religious involvement, social support, and health among African-American women on the east side of Detroit. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(7):549–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Padela AI, et al., Associations between religion-related factors and breast cancer screening among American Muslims. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17(3):660–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shaheen MA, et al., Utilization of mammography among Muslim women in Southern California. In: 133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition, American Public Health Association. Philadelphia; 2005. pp. 10–14Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Institute, N.C. Screening rates for several cancers miss their targets; 2015. Accessed 2018.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kawar LN. Barriers to breast cancer screening participation among Jordanian and Palestinian American women. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(1):88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Padela AI, et al. Religious beliefs and mammography intention: findings from a qualitative study of a diverse group of American Muslim women. Psychooncology. 2016;25(10):1175–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gullatte M, The influence of spirituality and religiosity on breast cancer screening delay in African American Women: application of the Theory of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior (TRA/TPB). Assoc Black Nurs Fac J. 2006;17(2):89Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pasick RJ, Burke NJ. A critical review of theory in breast cancer screening promotion across cultures. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holt CL, et al. A comparison of a spiritually based and non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church- attending African American men. Urol Nurs. 2009;29(4):249–58.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Ba-Yunus I, Muslims of Illinois, a demographic report. Chicago: East-West University; 1997. p. 9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vu M, et al. Muslim women’s perspectives on designing mosque-based women’s health interventions-An exploratory qualitative study. Women Health. 2018;58(3):334–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Padela A, et al. Developing religiously tailored health messages for behavioral change: introducing the reframe, reprioritize, and reform (“3R”) model. Soc Sci Med. 2018;204:92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Padela, AI, et al. Reducing muslim mammography disparities: outcomes from a religiously tailored mosque-based intervention. Health Educ Behav. 2018;45(6):1025–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Caring for body and soul: a workshop on women’s health program replication guide. https://pmr.uchicago.edu/page/developing-religiously-tailored-mammography-intervention-american-muslims.
  27. 27.
    McCance KL, et al. Validity and reliability of a breast cancer knowledge test. Am J Prev Med. 1990;6(2):93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Koenig HG, Bussing A. The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): a five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions 2010;1:78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abdel-Khalek A. Happiness, health, and religiosity: significant relations. Mental Health Relig Cult. 2006;9(1):321–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Raiya HA, et al. A psychological measure of Islamic religiousness: development and evidence for reliability and validity. Int J Psychol Relig. 2008;18(4):291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Franklin MD, Schlundt DG, Wallston KA. Development and validation of a religious health fatalism measure for the African-American faith community. J Health Psychol. 2008;13(3):323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vu M, et al. Predictors of delayed healthcare seeking among American Muslim women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(6):586–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thayer J, Stepwise regression as an exploratory data analysis procedure. In: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans; 2002.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sohl S, Moyer A. Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2007;45:252–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kreuter MW, et al. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol. 1999;18(5):487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kreuter MW, et al. Cultural tailoring for mammography and fruit and vegetable intake among low-income African-American women in urban public health centers. Prev Med. 2005;41(1):53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holt CL, Lukwago SN, Kreuter MW. Spirituality, breast cancer beliefs and mammography utilization among urban African American women. J Health Psychol. 2003;8(3):383–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Garza M, et al. A culturally targeted intervention to promote breast cancer screening among low-income women in East Baltimore, Maryland. Cancer Control. 2005;12(Suppl 2):34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hall C, et al. Effects of a culturally sensitive education program on the breast cancer knowledge and beliefs of hispanic women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007;34(6):1195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chin M, et al. Interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(Suppl 5):7S–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Prevention C.f.D.C.a. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program—Social Ecol Model; 2013. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Force, C.P.S.T. Increasing Cancer Screening: Multicomponent Interventions; 2016. p. 1–7.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Padela, AI, Malik S, Ahmed N. Acceptability of Friday sermons as a modality for health promotion and education. J Immigr Minor Health. 2018;20(5):1075–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Initiative on Islam and MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Section of Emergency MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Comprehensive Cancer CenterThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.School of Social WelfareStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  5. 5.Institute for Public HealthUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  6. 6.Section of General Internal MedicineThe Univezrsity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  7. 7.The University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations