Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Cyberbullying on Physical and Psychological Health of Arab American Adolescents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing a community-based, cross-sectional design, the present study explored Arab American adolescents’ experiences in cyberbullying and its effect on their health. A convenience sample of 150 Arab American adolescents, ages 12–16, were recruited from two community centers located at Southeast Michigan. The survey focused on cyberbullying victimization and perpetration in the past year including frequencies and types of technology used. Thirty-four percent of adolescents reported cyberbullying victimization and 26.7% reported cyberbullying perpetration at least once in the past year. Males were significantly more involved in both victimization and perpetration. Text messaging, Instagram and Facebook were most commonly used. Perpetration predicted physical complaints (p = .001), whereas, victimization predicted psychological distress (p = .014) after controlling for all demographic variables. Arab American adolescents reported significant cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Perpetrators experienced more physical symptoms while victims experienced more psychological distress. Implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Twenge JM, Joiner TE, Rogers ML, Martin GN. Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among US adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6(1):3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Langos C. Cyberbullying, the shades of harm. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2015;22(1):106–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch Suicide Res. 2010;14(3):206–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver–child relationships, internet use, and personal characteristics. J Adolesc. 2004;27(3):319–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Selkie EM, Fales JL, Moreno MA. Cyberbullying prevalence among us middle and high school–aged adolescents: a systematic review and quality assessment. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58(2):125–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sourander A, Klomek AB, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, Koskelainen M, et al. Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(7):720–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoff DL, Mitchell SN. Cyberbullying: causes, effects, and remedies. J Educ Admin. 2009;47(5):652–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider SK, O’Donnell L, Stueve A, Coulter RWS. Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: a regional census of high school students. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(1):171–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tynes B, Giang M. P01-298 Online victimization, depression and anxiety among adolescents in the us. Europ Psychiatry. 2009;24:686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper GD, Clements PT, Holt KE. Examining childhood bullying and adolescent suicide: Implications for school nurses. J Sch Nurs. 2012;28(4):275–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gini G, Espelage DL. Peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide risk in children and adolescents. JAMA 2014;312(5):545–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Geel M, Vedder P, Tanilon J. Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2014;168(5):435–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Låftman SB, Modin B, Östberg V. Cyberbullying and subjective health: a large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013;35(1):112–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53(1):13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Litwiller BJ, Brausch AM. Cyber bullying and physical bullying in adolescent suicide: the role of violent behavior and substance use. J Youth Adolesc. 2013;42(5):675–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45(7):1308–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smokowski PR, Evans CB, Cotter KL. The differential impacts of episodic, chronic, and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: the effects of victimization on the school experiences, social support, and mental health of rural adolescents. Viol Victims. 2014;29(6):1029–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Susan GW, Jennifer L-R, Cory W, Heather F. Adolescents transitioning to high school: sex differences in bullying victimization associated with depressive symptoms, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts. J Sch Nurs. 2017;33(6):467–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fahy AE, Stansfeld SA, Smuk M, Smith NR, Cummins S, Clark C. Longitudinal associations between cyberbullying involvement and adolescent mental health. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(5):502–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts N, Axas N, Nesdole R, Repetti L. Pediatric emergency department visits for mental health crisis: prevalence of cyber-bullying in suicidal youth. Child Adolesc Soc Work J. 2016;33(5):469–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell M, Spears B, Slee P, Butler D, Kift S. Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation. Emot Behav Differ. 2012;17(3–4):389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daine K, Hawton K, Singaravelu V, Stewart A, Simkin S, Montgomery P. The power of the web: a systematic review of studies of the influence of the internet on self-harm and suicide in young people. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bellamy A, Yousef M, Shaher W. The impact of cyberbullying on the self esteem and academic functioning of Arab American middle and high school students. J Res Educ Psychol. 2015;13(3):463–82.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Albdour M, Lewin L, Kavanaugh K, Hong JS, Wilson FL. Arab American adolescents’ perceived stress and bullying experiences: a qualitative study. Western J Nurs Res. 2017;39(12):1567–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Awad GH. The impact of acculturation and religious identification on perceived discrimination for Arab/Middle Eastern Americans. Cult Divers Ethn Min. 2010;16(1):59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wray-Lake L, Syvertsen AK, Flanagan CA. Contested citizenship and social exclusion: Adolescent Arab American immigrants’ views of the social contract. Appl Dev Sci. 2008;12(2):84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahmed SR, Kia-Keating M, Tsai KH. A structural model of racial discrimination, acculturative stress, and cultural resources among Arab American adolescents. Am J Comm Psychol. 2011;48(3–4):181–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Sayed AM, Galea S. The health of Arab-Americans living in the United States: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdelkarim RZ. Arab and Muslim Americans: collateral damage in the wars on terrorism, Iraq. Wash Rep Middle E Aff. 2003;22(4):55.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Census USCBot. About Race 2018. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html.

  31. Neuman B, Fawcett J. The Neuman systems model. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yarcheski TJ, Mahon NE, Yarcheski A, Hanks MM. Perceived stress and wellness in early adolescents using the Neuman Systems Model. J Sch Nurs. 2010;26(3):230–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Raskauskas J, Stoltz AD. Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev Psychology. 2007;43(3):564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Walker LS, Beck JE, Garber J, Lambert W. Children’s Somatization Inventory: psychometric properties of the revised form (CSI-24). J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;34(4):430–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lavigne JV, Saps M, Bryant FB. Reexamining the factor structure of somatization using the children’s somatization inventory (CSI-24) in a community sample. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012;37(8):914–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kadıoğlu H, Şişman FN, Ergün A. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of children’s somatization inventory. Asian Nurs Res. 2012;6(1):9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Aust NZ J Public Health. 2001;25(6):494–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand S-L, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Luk JW, Nansel TR. Co-occurrence of victimization from five subtypes of bullying: physical, verbal, social exclusion, spreading rumors, and cyber. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35(10):1103–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Electronic bullying among middle school students. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41(6):22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kann L. Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts, and health-related behaviors among students in grades 9–12—United States and selected sites, 2015. MMWR Surv Summ. 2016;65(9):1–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Low S, Espelage D. Differentiating cyber bullying perpetration from non-physical bullying: commonalities across race, individual, and family predictors. Psychol Viol. 2013;3(1):39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the united states: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(4):368–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Messias E, Kindrick K, Castro J. School bullying, cyberbullying, or both: correlates of teen suicidality in the 2011 CDC youth risk behavior survey. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(5):1063–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rice E, Petering R, Rhoades H, Winetrobe H, Goldbach J, Plant A, et al. Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among middle-school students. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(3):e66–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bauman S, Summers JJ. Peer victimization and depressive symptoms in Mexican American middle school students: including acculturation as a variable of interest. Hispanic J Behav Sci. 2009;31(4):515–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Price M, Chin A, Higa-McMillan M, Kim C, Christopher Frueh S. B. Prevalence and internalizing problems of ethnoracially diverse victims of traditional and cyber bullying. Sch Ment Health. 2013;5(4):183–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shapiro LAS, Margolin G. Growing up wired: social networking sites and adolescent psychosocial development. Clin Child Fam Psychol. 2014;17(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wright MF. Predictors of anonymous cyber aggression: the role of adolescents’ beliefs about anonymity, aggression, and the permanency of digital content. Cyberpsych Beh Soc N. 2014;17(7):431–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Heiman T, Olenik-Shemesh D. Cyberbullying experience and gender differences among adolescents in different educational settings. J Learn Disabil. 2015;48(2):146–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Devine P, Lloyd K. Internet use and psychological well-being among 10-year-old and 11-year-old children. Child Care Pract. 2012;18(1):5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ajrouch KJ. Gender, race, and symbolic boundaries: contested spaces of identity among Arab American adolescents. Soc Perspect. 2004;47(4):371–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, Lattanner MR. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(4):1073–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sticca F, Perren S. Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. J Youth Adolesc. 2013;42(5):739–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(3):277–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bonanno RA, Hymel S. Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. J Youth Adolesc. 2013;42(5):685–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gini G, Pozzoli T. Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2009;123(3):1059–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Campbell MA, Slee PT, Spears B, Butler D, Kift S. Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychol Int. 2013;34(6):613–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gini G, Pozzoli T, Hauser M. Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Pers Indiv Differ. 2011;50(5):603–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Gini G, Pozzoli T. Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132:720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Beckman L, Hagquist C, Hellström L. Does the association with psychosomatic health problems differ between cyberbullying and traditional bullying? Emot Behav Diff. 2012;17(3–4):421–34.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Nixon CL. Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014;5:143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang J, Nansel TR, Iannotti RJ. Cyber and traditional bullying: differential association with depression. J Adolesc Health. 2011;48(4):415–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rafla M, Carson NJ, DeJong SM. Adolescents and the internet: what mental health clinicians need to know. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16(9):472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Waasdorp TE, Bradshaw CP. The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(5):483–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Offline consequences of online victimization. J Sch Viol. 2007;6(3):89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Viol Juv J. 2006;4(2):148–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services and the Islamic Center of Detroit for facilitating access to potential participants; Jehad Najda and Kshama Vaghela for their assistance with data collection; Beth Langelier for her editorial support.

Funding

This research was supported by the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation Student Award, Wayne State University Graduate School and College of Nursing Dissertation Research Support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maha Albdour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the first and last authors’ Institutional Review Board and met all ethical standards, such as voluntary participation, confidentiality, and limited risk. The second and third author did not participate in the data collection.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained in the study.

Research Involving Human and Animal Participants

The authors ensured that all ethical standards were met; thus, there are no ethical issues with regards to human participants or animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albdour, M., Hong, J.S., Lewin, L. et al. The Impact of Cyberbullying on Physical and Psychological Health of Arab American Adolescents. J Immigrant Minority Health 21, 706–715 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-00850-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-00850-w

Keywords

Navigation