Examining the Role of Income Inequality and Neighborhood Walkability on Obesity and Physical Activity among Low-Income Hispanic Adults
- 315 Downloads
Obesity is a major public health issue affecting rising medical costs and contributing to morbidity and premature mortality. We aimed to identify factors that may play a role in obesity and physical activity at the individual and environmental/neighborhood levels. We analyzed data from an adult sample who were parents of students enrolled in a school-based health and wellness program. The sample was restricted to those who were Hispanic and whose children were on free/reduced lunch (n = 377). Dependent variables: body mass index (BMI); neighborhood walkability. Walk Score® was used to assess neighborhood walkability. Overall, 46% of participants were obese and 31% were overweight. The median age of respondents was 34 years, and the majority were female (88%) and married (59%). Participants who resided in a census tract with a higher relative income inequality (high, OR 2.54, 90% CI 1.154–5.601; moderate-high OR 2.527, 90% CI 1.324–4.821) and those who were unmarried (OR 1.807, 90% CI 1.119–2.917) were more likely to be obese versus normal weight. Overweight individuals that resided in areas that were walkable versus car-dependent averaged more days engaging in walking for at least 30-min (p <.05). Identifying individual and neighborhood factors associated with obesity can inform more targeted approaches to combat obesity at multiple ecological levels. The importance of understanding how neighborhood characteristics influence health-related and behavioral outcomes is further reinforced with the current findings. Identifying effective strategies to engage communities and organizations in creating, implementing, adopting, evaluating, and sustaining policy and/or environmental interventions will be needed to combat the obesity epidemic.
KeywordsHealth and place Hispanic Minority Low income Physical activity Income inequality
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript
Ethical Approval was granted by the Texas A&M University Institutional Review Board (IRB Number: IRB2011-0012D).
Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participation in this study was voluntary and the study was carried out in accordance with all ethical standards.
This material is based on work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2011-68001-30138. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
- 1.Committee, P.A.G.A. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report, 2008. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. pp. A1–14.Google Scholar
- 2.National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2014: with special feature on adults aged 55–64, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2015.Google Scholar
- 7.Score, W., Walk score methodology. http://www. walkscore. com/professional/methodology.php. Last viewed January, 2011. 2012;10:3503.Google Scholar
- 12.McLeroy KR, et al. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Behav. 1988;15(4):351–77.Google Scholar
- 13.Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization. 2007. p. 1–77.Google Scholar
- 15.Towne S. Differential effects of the great recession on minority populations. 2013.Google Scholar
- 17.U.S. Department of Education. Improving Basic Programs Operated by Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A). Available at: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/index.html. 2015; Available from: http://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/News_and_Multimedia/Press_Releases/2015/TEA_identifies_more_than_400_Title_I_Reward_Schools/.
- 19.CDC. About adult BMI. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/. [cited 2016].
- 22.World Bank, Development Research Group. GINI index (World Bank estimate). 2015.Google Scholar
- 23.Noss A. Household income: 2013. Washington: US Census Bureau, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Department of Commerce, 2014.Google Scholar
- 24.Carr LJ, Dunsiger SI, Marcus BH. Validation of walk score for estimating access to walkable amenities. Br J Sports Med. 2010;bjsports69609.Google Scholar
- 26.Institute S, Base SAS 9.4 Procedures guide: statistical procedures. 2014: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
- 33.BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire. 2012. 2013.Google Scholar
- 35.Medicine, T.R.B.a.I.o., Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence. Special Report 282. 2005: Washington.Google Scholar