Racial/Ethnic Differences in Those Accompanying Medicare Patients to the Doctor: Insights from the 2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary’s Survey

  • Tetine Lynn Sentell
  • Chengli Shen
  • Doug Landsittel
  • Mary Helen Mays
  • Janet Southerland
  • Marshaleen Henriques King
  • Deborah A. Taira
Original Paper

Abstract

Surprisingly little current, population-level detail exists regarding companion accompaniment for health care among Medicare beneficiaries, particularly by race/ethnicity. For respondents in the 2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary’s Survey Access to Care public use data (N = 12,253), multivariable models predicted accompaniment to the doctor by race/ethnicity, adjusting for confounders. Chi square analyses compared, by race/ethnicity, who was accompanying and why. Overall, 37.5% of beneficiaries had accompaniment. In multivariable analyses, non-Hispanic blacks (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.03–1.36) and Hispanics (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.25–1.74) were significantly more likely than non-Hispanic whites to have accompaniment. Over 35% of all three groups had someone to “take notes,” “ask questions,” and/or “explain things,” which did not vary by race/ethnicity; significant differences were seen for “explain instructions,” “translate,” and “moral support.” Hispanics had the highest percentages for all three. Many Medicare beneficiaries have accompaniment to doctors’ appointments, particularly in minority racial/ethnic groups, which should be considered in policy and practice.

Keywords

Medicare Race/ethnicity Caregiving Health communication 

References

  1. 1.
    Piette J. Editorial: moving beyond the notion of ‘self’ care. Chronic Illn. 2010;6:3–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Black S, et al. Diabetes literacy and informal social support: a qualitative study of patients at a diabetes centre. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26:248–57. doi:10.1111/jocn.13383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. “This does my head in.” Ethnographic study of self-management by people with diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laidsaar-Powell RC, et al. Physician-patient-companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91:3–13. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wolff JL, Roter DL. Hidden in plain sight: medical visit companions as a resource for vulnerable older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1409–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolff JL, Roter DL. Family presence in routine medical visits: a meta-analytical review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:823–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elwyn G, et al. Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second of the consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:477–82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith KP, Christakis NA. Social networks and health. Ann Rev Sociol. 2008;34:405–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sayers SL, et al. Family involvement in the care of healthy medical outpatients. Fam Pract. 2006;23:317–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Umberson D, Montez JK. Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. ‎J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51:S54–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Valente TW. social networks and health: models, methods, and applications.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vassilev I, et al. The influence of social networks on self-management support: a metasynthesis. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:719.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    House JS, et al. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988;241:540–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mead EL, et al. Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:e15–e29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Cultural insights: Communicating with Hispanics/Latinos. 2012. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/pdf/audience/audienceinsight_culturalinsights.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2016.
  16. 16.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy Communities Program: Building Our Understanding: Culture Insights Communicating with Hispanic/Latinos. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dch/programs/healthycommunitiesprogram/tools/pdf/hispanic_latinos_insight.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  17. 17.
    Peters RM, Aroian KJ, Flack JM. African American culture and hypertension prevention. West J Nurs Res. 2006;28:831–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dilworth-Anderson P, Williams IC, Gibson BE. Issues of race, ethnicity, and culture in caregiving research: a 20-year review (1980–2000). Gerontologist. 2002;42:237–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    del Río N. The influence of Latino ethnocultural factors on decision making at the end of life: WITHHOLDING and withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2010;6:125–49. doi:10.1080/15524256.2010.529009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Savage B, Foli KJ, Edwards NE, Abrahamson K. Familism and health care provision to Hispanic older adults. J Gerontol Nurs. 2016;42:21–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caballero AE. Understanding the Hispanic/Latino patient. Am J Med. 2011;124:S10–5. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Howard DL, et al. Distribution of African Americans in residential care/assisted living and nursing homes: More evidence of racial disparity? Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1272–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCann JJ, et al. Comparison of informal caregiving by black and white older adults in a community population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1612–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Navaie-Waliser M, et al. The experiences and challenges of informal caregivers: common themes and differences among whites, blacks, and Hispanics. Gerontologist. 2001;41:733–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CMS Product No. 11034. 2014. Available at: https://www.medicare.gov/Pubs/pdf/11034.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2016.
  26. 26.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Caregiver resource kit. 2016. Available at: https://www.medicare.gov/campaigns/caregiver/caregiver-resource-kit.html. Accessed 24 July 2016.
  27. 27.
    Betancourt JR, et al. Guide to preventing readmissions among racially and ethnically diverse Medicare beneficiaries. Prepared by the disparities solutions center, mongan institute for health policy at massachusetts general hospital. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of Minority Health; 2015.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ishikawa H, et al. Physician-elderly patient-companion communication and roles of companions in Japanese geriatric encounters. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:2307–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brown JB, et al. Roles and influence of people who accompany patients on visits to the doctor. Can Fam Physician. 1998;44:1644–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuluski K, et al. A qualitative descriptive study on the alignment of care goals between older persons with multi-morbidities, their family physicians and informal caregivers. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rosland AM, et al. Family and friend participation in primary care visits of patients with diabetes or heart failure: patient and physician determinants and experiences. Med Care. 2011;49:37–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wolff JL, et al. Going it together: persistence of older adults’ accompaniment to physician visits by a family companion. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:106–12. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03770.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File [Data file and code book]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Downloadable-Public-Use-Files/MCBS-Public-Use-File/index.html. Accessed 26 Jun 2016.
  34. 34.
    von Elm E, et al. STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344–9. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce. Patients and Informal Caregivers. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Future Health Care Workforce for Older Americans. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US); 2008. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215403/. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  36. 36.
    Cené CW, et al. The effect of patient race and blood pressure control on patient-physician communication. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:1057–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Johnson RL, et al. Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:2084–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roter DL, et al: Patient and family empowerment as agents of ambulatory care safety and quality. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clayman ML, et al. Autonomy-related behaviors of patient companions and their effect on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits. ‎Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1583–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wolff JL, et al. A tool to strengthen the older patient-companion partnership in primary care: results from a pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:312–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rosland AM, et al. Family influences on self-management among functionally independent adults with diabetes or heart failure: do family members hinder as much as they help? Chronic Illn. 2010;6:22–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bookwala J, Marshall KI, Manning SW. Who needs a friend? Marital status transitions and physical health outcomes in later life. Health Psychol. 2014;33:505–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    King GL, et al. Understanding and addressing unique needs of diabetes in Asian Americans, native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1181–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aitaoto N, et al. Design and results of a culturally tailored cancer outreach project by and for Micronesian women. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of Public Health StudiesUniversity of Hawai‘i at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Section on Biomarkers and Prediction Modeling, Department of MedicineUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research ConsortiumUniversity of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanUSA
  4. 4.School of DentistryMeharry Medical CollegeNashvilleUSA
  5. 5.Morehouse School of MedicineAtlantaUSA
  6. 6.Daniel K. Inouye College of PharmacyUniversity of Hawai‘i at HiloHiloUSA

Personalised recommendations