Using Citizen Scientists to Gather, Analyze, and Disseminate Information About Neighborhood Features That Affect Active Living
- 728 Downloads
Many Latinos are insufficiently active, partly due to neighborhoods with little environmental support for physical activity. Multi-level approaches are needed to create health-promoting neighborhoods in disadvantaged communities. Participant “citizen scientists” were adolescent (n = 10, mean age = 12.8 ± 0.6 years) and older adult (n = 10, mean age = 71.3 ± 6.5 years), low income Latinos in North Fair Oaks, California. Citizen scientists conducted environmental assessments to document perceived barriers to active living using the Stanford Healthy Neighborhood Discovery Tool, which records GPS-tracked walking routes, photographs, audio narratives, and survey responses. Using a community-engaged approach, citizen scientists subsequently attended a community meeting to engage in advocacy training, review assessment data, prioritize issues to address and brainstorm potential solutions and partners. Citizen scientists each conducted a neighborhood environmental assessment and recorded 366 photographs and audio narratives. Adolescents (n = 4), older adults (n = 7) and community members (n = 4) collectively identified reducing trash and improving personal safety and sidewalk quality as the priority issues to address. Three adolescent and four older adult citizen scientists volunteered to present study findings to key stakeholders. This study demonstrated that with minimal training, low-income, Latino adolescent and older adult citizen scientists can: (1) use innovative technology to gather information about features of their neighborhood environment that influence active living, (2) analyze their information and identify potential solutions, and (3) engage with stakeholders to advocate for the development of healthier neighborhoods.
KeywordsPhysical activity Built environment Latinos Mobile technology Community engaged approach
The project described was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through UL1 RR025744. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. At the time this study was conducted Drs. Winter and Sheats were supported by US Public Health Service grant 5T32L007034 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. The following individuals assisted with this project: Nkeiruka Umeh, Martell Hesketh, Cynthia Perez, Aldo Chazaro, Alexis Fields. Rhonda McClinton Brown and Jill Evans from the Stanford University Office of Community Health have provided much support for this and other community based projects using the Stanford Healthy Neighborhood Discovery Tool. The authors are grateful to have worked with such thoughtful and engaged citizen scientist co-researchers.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors of this paper do not report any conflict of interests.
- 8.Buman MP, Winter SJ, Baker C, Hekler EB, Otten JJ, King AC. Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Teams (NEAAT): engaging older adults in policy activities to improve food and physical environments. Trans Behav Med. 2012;2(2):249–53.Google Scholar
- 9.Winter SJ, Buman MP, Sheats JL, Hekler EB, Otten JJ, Baker C, et al. Harnessing the potential of older adults to measure and modify their environments: long-term successes of the Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Team (NEAAT) Study. Trans Behav Med. 2014;4(2):226–7.Google Scholar
- 11.Lopez MH, Gonzalez-Barrera A, Patten E, Center PH. Closing the digital divide: Latinos and technology adoption. Washington: Pew Hispanic Center; 2013.Google Scholar
- 16.McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Behav. 1988;15(4):351–77.Google Scholar
- 17.Ramirez-Andreotta MD, Brusseau ML, Artiola JF, Maier RM, Gandolfi AJ. Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: the Gardenroots case study. In: Caron R, Merrick J, editors. Public health: improving health via inter-professional collaborations. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2014.Google Scholar
- 18.Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, et al. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience. 2009;59(11):977–84.Google Scholar
- 19.Bonney R, Ballard H, Jordan R, McCallie E, Phillips T, Shirk J, et al. Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Washington: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE); 2009.Google Scholar
- 20.Wiggins A, Crowston K, editors. From conservation to crowdsourcing: a typology of citizen science. In: Proceedings of the forty-fourth Hawai’i international conference on system science (HICSS-44), Koloa, HI; 2011.Google Scholar
- 21.Goldman Rosas L, Thiyagarajan S, Goldstein B, Drieling R, Padilla Romero PP, Ma J, et al. The effectiveness of two community-based weight loss strategies among obese, low-income US Latinos. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(4):537–50.e2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2014.10.020.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Al Stewart, Km Mills, Ac King, Wl Haskell, Gillis D, Pl Ritter. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(0195–9131):1126–41.Google Scholar
- 24.Sallis JF, Pinski RB, Grossman RM, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of self-efficacy scales for healthrelated diet and exercise behaviors. Health Educ Behav. 1988;3(3):283–92.Google Scholar
- 28.Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 1995;19(2):189–211.Google Scholar
- 29.Prevention Institute Oakland, California. 2014. https://doi.org/www.preventioninstitute.org/index.php.
- 31.Winter S, Buman M, Sheats J, Hekler E, Otten J, Baker C, et al. Harnessing the potential of older adults to measure and modify their environments: long-term successes of the Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Team (NEAAT) Study. Trans Behav Med. 2014 ePub ahead of publication (2014/04/22:1–2).Google Scholar
- 32.Lee SM. Stanford app helps improve neighborhoods. San Francisco: San Francisco Chronicle; 2013.Google Scholar
- 33.Newby K. Street smarts: using citizen scientists to fight for healthier neighborhoods. Stanf Med. Summer, 2013;30(2):18–21 and 44–45.Google Scholar
- 34.Salud America. Latino youth & seniors use Stanford walkability app to improve street conditions as part of ‘Nuestra Voz’ study. 2014 [cited 2015 January 19 2015]. https://doi.org/www.communitycommons.org/sapolicies/latino-youth-seniors-use-stanford-walkability-app-to-improve-street-conditions-as-part-of-nuestra-voz-study/.
- 43.Franco MR, Tong A, Howard K, Sherrington C, Ferreira PH, Pinto RZ, et al. Older people’s perspectives on participation in physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature. Br J Sports Med. 2015:1–9.Google Scholar
- 49.Demiris G, Rantz MJ, Aud MA, Marek KD, Tyrer HW, Skubic M, et al. Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. Inform Health Soc Care. 2004;29(2):87–94.Google Scholar
- 50.Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, Madden L. Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc. 2003;23(05):561–82.Google Scholar
- 51.Kutner M, Greenberg E, Baer J. A first look at the literacy of America’s adults in the 21st century. Washington: U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics; 2005.Google Scholar
- 53.Ejiogu N, Norbeck JH, Mason MA, Cromwell BC, Zonderman AB, Evans MK. Recruitment and retention strategies for minority or poor clinical research participants: lessons from the healthy aging in neighborhoods of diversity across the life span study. The Gerontologist. 2011;51(suppl 1):S33–45.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 54.Israel BA, Krieger J, Vlahov D, Ciske S, Foley M, Fortin P, et al. Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers. J Urban Health. 2006;83(6):1022–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 55.Seguin RA, Morgan EH, Connor LM, Garner JA, King AC, Sheats JL, et al. Rural food and physical activity assessment using a novel e-tablet-based application: findings and opportunities to catalyze change. Prev Chronic Dis. In press.Google Scholar
- 56.Sheats J, Winter S, Padilla-Romero P, King A. FEAST (Food Environment Assessment using the Stanford Tool): development of a mobile application to crowd-source resident interactions with the food environment. Ann Behav Med. 2014;47(S1):s264.Google Scholar
- 58.Moran M, Werner P, Doron I, Benvenisti Y, HaGani N, King AC, et al. Health promoting environments for older adults: Identifying environmental facilitators and barriers for walking among older adults in the city of Haifa. In: The annual conference of the Israeli geographical association. The University of Haifa, Israel; 2015.Google Scholar
- 59.Goldman Rosas L, Buman M, Castro C, Winter S, Salvo D, Sheats J, et al. Harnessing the capacity of citizen science to promote active living in California and Mexico. Place Migration and Health, Bellagio, Italy; 2014.Google Scholar