Advertisement

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 1819–1825 | Cite as

Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence in a Migrant Farmworker Community in Baja California, México

  • Marcella J. Lopez
  • Rachel A. Mintle
  • Sylvia Smith
  • Alicia Garcia
  • Vanessa N. Torres
  • Allie Keough
  • Hugo Salgado
Original Paper

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the most common forms of violence against women worldwide. Among Mexican women, it is estimated that 15 to 71 % have experienced physical or sexual abuse by an intimate male partner in their lifetime. This study examined the prevalence of four leading risk factors associated with IPV (alcohol consumption, education, socioeconomic status (SES), and gender roles) in adult women (n = 68) in a migrant farmworker community in México. Alcohol consumption among women was higher than the national average, and partner consumption was lower. Education level and SES were low, and women identified with a feminist ideology more than a traditional gender role. Results also revealed that 86.4 % (n = 57) of participants identified violence against women as a common problem in the community, and the majority (94.0 %, n = 62) of participants believe that IPV specifically is a problem within the community.

Keywords

Mexican Migrant farmworker Intimate partner violence Risk factors Gender roles 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization: Violence against women: Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. 2011. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/.
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Intimate partner violence. 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/intimatepartnerviolence/index.html.
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization: World report on violence and health. 2002. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/9241545615.pdf.
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization: Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: taking action and generating evidence. 2010. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241564007_eng.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Castro R, Peek-Asa C, Ruiz A. Violence against women in México: a study of abuse before and during pregnancy. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1110–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olaiz G, et al. Diseño metodológico de la Encuesta Nacional sobre Violencia contra las Mujeres en México. Salud Publica México. 2006;48:328–35.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramirez-Rodriguez J. La violencia de varones contra sus parejas heterosexuales: realidades y desafíos. Un recuento de la producción mexicana. Salud Pública de México. 2006;48(2):315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Instituto Nacional de salud Pública en México, INSP: Encuesta Nacional sobre Violencia contra las Mujeres, ENVIM. 2006. http://cedoc.inmujeres.gob.mx/documentos_download/ENVIM_2006.pdf.
  9. 9.
    Avila-Burgos L, Valdez-Santiago R, Hijar M, et al. Factors associated with severity of intimate partner abuse in México: results of the first national survey of violence against women. Can J Public Health. 2009;100(6):436–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Intimate partner violence: risk and protective factors. 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/intimatepartnerviolence/riskprotectivefactors.html.
  11. 11.
    Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. California: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 465–85.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Injury center: violence prevention. 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/overview/social-ecologicalmodel.html.
  13. 13.
    Volkmann T, et al. Drug scene familiarity and exposure to gang violence among residents in a rural farming community in Baja California, Mexico. Glob Public Health Int J Res Policy Pract. 2013;8(1):65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kulis S, Marsiglia FF, Nagoshi JL. Gender roles, externalizing behaviors, and substance use among Mexican-American adolescents. J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2010;10(3):283–307.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cota AA, Xinaris S. Factor structure of the sex-role ideology scale: introducing a short form. Sex Roles. 1993;29:5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reynolds WM. Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. J Clin Psychol. 1982;38(1):119–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fisher RJ, Tellis GJ. Removing social desirability bias with indirect questioning: is the cure worse than the disease? Adv Consum Res. 1998;25:563–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres, INMUJERES: Violencia en las relaciones de pareja: resultados de la Encuesta Nacional Sobre la Dinámica de las Relaciones en los Hogares, 2006. http://cedoc.inmujeres.gob.mx/documentos_download/100924.pdf, 2008.
  19. 19.
    Agoff C, Rajsbaum A, Herrera C. Perspectivas de las mujeres maltratadas sobre la violencia. Salud Pública de México. 2006;48(2):307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcella J. Lopez
    • 1
  • Rachel A. Mintle
    • 1
  • Sylvia Smith
    • 1
  • Alicia Garcia
    • 1
  • Vanessa N. Torres
    • 1
  • Allie Keough
    • 1
  • Hugo Salgado
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Public HealthSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Joint Doctoral Program in Public Health (Global Health)San Diego State/University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Joint Doctoral Program in Public Health (Global Health)San Diego State/University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations