A Systematic Review of Naturalistic Interventions in Refugee Populations
- 1.2k Downloads
Naturalistic interventions with refugee populations examine outcomes following mental health interventions in existing refugee service organisations. The current review aimed to examine outcomes of naturalistic interventions and quality of the naturalistic intervention literature in refugee populations with the view to highlight the strengths and limitations of naturalistic intervention studies. Database search was conducted using the search terms ‘refugee’, ‘asylum seeker’, ‘treatment’, ‘therapy’ and ‘intervention. No date limitations were applied, but searches were limited to articles written in English. Seven studies were identified that assessed the outcome of naturalistic interventions on adult refugees or asylum seekers in a country of resettlement using quantitative outcome measures. Results showed significant variation in the outcomes of naturalistic intervention studies, with a trend towards showing decreased symptomatology at post-intervention. However, conclusions are limited by methodological problems of the studies reviewed, particularly poor documentation of intervention methods and lack of control in the design of naturalistic intervention studies. Further examination of outcomes following naturalistic interventions is needed with studies which focus on increasing the rigour of the outcome assessment process.
KeywordsRefugee Mental health Intervention Adult Systematic review
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review
- 1.Aroche J, Coello MJ. Ethnocultural considerations in the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers. In: Wilson JP, Drozdek B, editors. Broken spirits: the treatment of traumatised asylum seekers, refugees, war and torture victims. NY: Hove; 2004.Google Scholar
- 4.*Brune M, Haasen C, Krausz M, Yagdirn O, Bustos E, Eisenman D. Belief systems as coping factors for traumatised refugees: a pilot study. Eur Psychiatr. 2002;17:451–8. Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.advertisers/505814/description#description.
- 11.Herman J. Trauma and recovery. NY: Basic Books; 1997.Google Scholar
- 14.Mollica RF, Lavelle J. Southeast Asian Refugees. In: Comas-Diaz L, Griffith EEH, editors. Clinical guidelines in cross-cultural mental health. New York: Wiley; 1988.Google Scholar
- 17.National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/evidence_statement_form.pdf.
- 20.*Palic S, Elklit A. An explorative outcome study of CBT-based multidisciplinary treatment in a diverse group of refugees from a Danish treatment centre for rehabilitation of traumatised refugees. Torture. 2009;19(3):248–70. Retrieved from http://www.irct.org/library/torture-journal.aspx.
- 21.Palic S, Elklit A. Psychosocial treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in adult refugees: a systematic review of the literature of prospective treatment outcome studies and a critique. J Affect Disord. 2010. doi: 10.1016/j/jad.2010.07.005.
- 28.*Van Wyk S, Schweitzer R, Brough M, Vromanns L, Murray K. A longitudinal study of mental health in refugees from Burma: the impact of therapeutic interventions. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012. doi: 10.1177/0004867412443059.