Reasons for Self-Medication and Perceptions of Risk Among Mexican Migrant Farm Workers
- 965 Downloads
Although the frequency of self-medication among Mexican migrants has been well-documented in the public health literature, the multiple reasons for this practice are poorly understood. Most studies point to migrants’ cultural preferences for Mexican medications, their prior experiences in countries where antibiotics are loosely regulated, and their lack of access to health care as the primary factors behind their self-medication. Based on participant observation and in-depth interviews with 23 Mexican migrants in a farm working community in the interior of California, we argue that occupational vulnerability is an equally important factor that encourages self-medication. All 23 of our interviewees reported having engaged in some degree of self-medication, notable in this location 8 h from the US–Mexico border. Among interviewees, occupational vulnerability represented an even more important factor influencing self-medication than lack of health insurance or lack of legal documentation. While interviewees did express a preference for Mexican medications as more potent and effective, this did not necessarily translate to a preference for using them without a doctor’s supervision. Finally, we show that rather than remaining unaware of the risks of following this custom “transported from Latin America”, Mexican migrants devised an elaborate hierarchy of resort of the safest self-medication practices to follow.
KeywordsSelf-medication Latinos Migrant farm workers Risk perception Pharmaceuticals Structural vulnerability Hierarchy of resort
We would like to thank our interviewees for graciously sharing with us meals, friendship, and personal narratives about their lives and how they access health care. This research was made possible by funding from the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Montana and by a small grant from the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Colorado, Denver.
- 12.Helman CG. Culture, health, and illness. 4th ed. London: Arnold; 2001.Google Scholar
- 14.Ugalde A, Homedes N. Household storage of pharmaceuticals in Costa Rica. In: Etkin Nina, Tan ML, editors. Medicines: meanings and contexts. Quezon City: Health action information network; 1994. p. 165–83.Google Scholar
- 15.US Census. Census 2000 summary file 1 (SF-1) 100-percent data. Table P4. “Hispanic or Latino, and Not Hispanic Latino by race”. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2000.Google Scholar
- 16.Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.Google Scholar
- 18.Bourgois P. A Latino oral health paradox? Using ethnography to specify the factors that contribute to immigrant children’s poorer oral health. Natl Assoc Pract Anthropol Bull. 2010;34(1):68–83. Special issue on anthropological perspectives on migration and health.Google Scholar
- 20.Sanjek R. Fieldnotes: the making of anthropology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1990. p. 93–4.Google Scholar
- 22.Whyte SR, van der Geest S, Hardon A. Injectionists: the attraction of technology. In: Whyte SR, van der Geest S, Hardon A, editors. Social lives of medicines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 104–29.Google Scholar
- 23.Whyte SR, Van der Geest S. Injections: issues and methods for anthropological research. In: Nina E, Tan ML, editors. Medicines: meanings and contexts. Quezon City: Health Action Information Network; 1994. p. 137–61.Google Scholar
- 24.Wyatt HV. The popularity of injections in the Third World: origins and consequences for poliomyelitis. Soc Sci Med. 1995;88(6):654–6.Google Scholar
- 25.Romanucci-Ross L. The hierarchy of resort in curative practices: the Admiralty Islands, Melanesia. In: Landy D, editor. Culture, disease, and healing: studies in medical anthropology. New York: Macmillan; 1977. p. 481–7.Google Scholar
- 26.Viladrich A. Botanicas in America’s backyard: uncovering the world of Latino immigrants’ herb-healing practices. Hum Org. 2006;65(4):407–19.Google Scholar