Chinese-Australian Women’s Knowledge, Facilitators and Barriers Related to Cervical Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study
Understanding the different facilitators and barriers to screening within cultural and ethnic groups is important for developing appropriate education and outreach programs to underserved groups. Qualitative methods were employed to gain a rich understanding of participant views. In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 Chinese Australian women in their native languages and analysed using content analysis. Knowledge of cervical cancer was low, and few participants understood the benefits and purpose of screening. Having a doctor’s recommendation was a strong motivator, and returning for screening was encouraged by having a female Chinese doctor perform the exam, receiving a reminder letter and the absence of cost for screening participation. However, participation was inhibited by logistical barriers, cultural beliefs and previous painful screening experiences. A range of multifaceted facilitators and barriers must be considered when developing interventions to increase the rates of cervical screening in this population.
KeywordsChinese women Cervical cancer screening Qualitative research Australia
The authors would like to thank the participants for their time and Ms Shuk Man Wan for her assistance in conducting the interviews.
- 1.Ferlay J, Shin H, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin D. GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer incidence and mortality Worldwide:. IARC CancerBase No 10 [Internet] [serial on the Internet]. 2010: Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr.
- 2.Screening and early detection of cancer. Geneva: World Health Organisation; [cited 2010 2 July]; Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/en/.
- 6.Fontana M, Bischoff A. Uptake of breast cancer screening measures among immigrant and Swiss women in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138(49–50):752–8.Google Scholar
- 21.Klug SJ, Hetzer M, Blettner M. Screening for breast and cervical cancer in a large German city: participation, motivation and knowledge of risk factors. Eur J Public Health 2005;15(1):70–7.Google Scholar
- 24.Sligo F, Jameson A, Comrie M. New Zealand Polynesian women’s access to information about cervical screening. J Manage Med. 1998;12(6):361–9, 21.Google Scholar
- 46.ABS Year Book Australia, 2009–10. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics 2010.Google Scholar
- 47.Behling O, Law K. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: problem and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.Google Scholar
- 48.Miles MB, Huberman AM. An expanded sourcebook: qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
- 49.Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation [serial on the Internet]. 2001; 7(17): Available from: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
- 50.Cervical cancer screening. Cancer Council Australia; 2010 [cited 2011 5 January]; Available from: http://www.cancer.org.au/cancersmartlifestyle/Earlydetection/Screeningprograms/cervicalcancerscreening.htm.
- 53.Taylor VM, Yasui Y, Burke N, Nguyen T, Acorda E, Thai H, et al. Pap testing adherence among Vietnamese American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13(4):613–9.Google Scholar
- 63.Koo JH, Arasaratnam MM, Liu K, Redmond DM, Connor SJ, Sung JJ, et al. Knowledge, perception and practices of colorectal cancer screening in an ethnically diverse population. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010.Google Scholar