Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 293–298

How Readable are Spanish-Language Medicaid Applications?

  • Julie S. Hansen
  • Lorraine S. Wallace
  • Jennifer E. DeVoe
Original Paper

Abstract

Nationally, Hispanics comprise nearly one-quarter of all non-elderly Medicaid recipients. We evaluated readability, layout characteristics, and document complexity of state-issued Spanish-language Medicaid enrollment applications. We located and analyzed Internet-based Spanish enrollment applications from 37 states and the District of Columbia. We calculated the readability of each Medicaid enrollment application “Signature” page using the Spanish Lexile Analyzer. We assessed application layout characteristics utilizing the User-Friendliness Tool, and we evaluated document complexity using the PMOSE/IKIRSCH scale. The average Lexile score estimated an 11th–12th grade reading level (M = 1184, SD = 192) for “Signature” pages of enrollment applications. Most applications used small font size and lacked adequate white space. Document complexity ranged from level 3 (moderate) to level 5 (very high); the majority of applications ranked at level 4 (high). Spanish-language Medicaid enrollment applications should be revised to adhere to low-literacy guidelines, which may improve the accessibility of Medicaid coverage for eligible Spanish-speaking families.

Keywords

Literacy Readability Health literacy Medicaid Spanish 

References

  1. 1.
    Social Security Administration. Social Security Online Medicaid Information, Washington, DC, 2010. http://www.ssa.gov/disabilityresearch/wi/medicaid.htm. Accessed 04 June 2010.
  2. 2.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. Statehealthfacts.org State Medicaid fact sheets, Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation, 2008. http://www.statehealthfacts.org/medicaid.jsp. Accessed 04 June 2010.
  3. 3.
    Pew Hispanic Center. Statistical portrait of Hispanics in the United States. Pew Research Center, Washington DC, 2008. January 21, 2010. http://pewhispanic.org/factsheets/factsheet.php?FactsheetID=58. Accessed 04 June 2010.
  4. 4.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. Statehealthfacts.org Medicaid Coverage Rates for the Nonelderly by Race/Ethnicity, states (2007–2008). http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparetable.jsp?ind=163&cat=3&sub=42. Accessed 04 June 2010.
  5. 5.
    McCollister KE, Arheart KL, Lee DJ, et al. Declining health insurance access among US Hispanic workers: not all jobs are created equal. Am J Ind Med 2010;53:163-70.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rutledge MS, McLaughlin CG. Hispanics and health insurance coverage: the rising disparity. Med Care. 2008;46:1086–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stuber J, Bradley E. Barriers to Medicaid enrollment: who is at risk? Am J Public Health. 2005;95:292–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flores G, Abreu M, Tomany-Korman SC. Why are Latinos the most uninsured racial/ethnic group of US children? A community-based study of risk factors for and consequences of being an uninsured Latino child. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e730–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Adult Literacy A First Look at the Literacy of America’s Adults in the 21st Century. NCES Publication No. 2006470; December, 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilson JM, Wallace LS, DeVoe JE. Are state medicaid application enrollment forms readable? J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20:423–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zite NB, Philipson SJ, Wallace LS. Consent to Sterilization section of the Medicaid-Title XIX form: is it understandable? Contraception. 2007;75:256–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roskos SE, Keenum AJ, Newman LM, Wallace LS. Literacy demands and formatting characteristics of opioid contracts in chronic nonmalignant pain management. J Pain. 2007;8:753–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:721–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pew Hispanic Center. Statistical portrait of Hispanics in the United States, 2008. Table 22: Educational attainment by Race/Ethnicity. http://pewhispanic.org/files/factsheets/hispanics2008/Table%2022.pdf. Accessed 04 June 2010.
  15. 15.
    Doak C, Doak L, Root J. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weiss BD. Health literacy: a manual for clinicians. Chicago: AMA Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Lexile Framework for Reading. Spanish Lexile Analyzer. Metametrics, Inc; 2010. http://www.lexile.com/analyzer/spanish. Accessed 04 June 2010.
  18. 18.
    Arnold CL, Davis TC, Frempong JO, et al. Assessment of newborn screening patient education materials. Pediatrics. 2006;117:S320–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mosenthal PB, Kirsch IS. A new measure for assessing document complexity: The PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability scale. J Adolesc Adult Lit. 1998;41:638–57.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang C, Gallo RE, Fleisher L, Miller SM. Literacy assessment of family health history tools for public health prevention. Public Health Genom. (in press).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicaid and children’s health insurance program provisions in health reform bills: Affordable Health Care for America Act & The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/7952-02-2.pdf. Accessed 04 June 2010.
  22. 22.
    Pew Hispanic Center. The Latino digital divide: The native born versus the foreign born. Washington DC: Pew Research Center, July 28, 2010. http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=123. Accessed 09 November 2010.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie S. Hansen
    • 1
  • Lorraine S. Wallace
    • 2
  • Jennifer E. DeVoe
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Tennessee Graduate School of MedicineKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Tennessee Graduate School of MedicineKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Family MedicineOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations