Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 433–444

Immigration, Health Care Access, and Recent Cancer Tests Among Mexican-Americans in California

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Abstract

Immigrants’ lower rates of cancer testing may be due to lack of fluency in English and other skills and knowledge about navigating US health care markets, lack of access to health services, or both. We analyzed 9,079 Mexican-American respondents to the 2001 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) grouped as born in the US, living in the US 10 or more years, or living in the US less than 10 years. The CHIS provides the largest Mexican-American sample in a US survey. Access to care meant having health insurance coverage and a usual source of care. English proficiency meant the respondent took the interview in English. Multivariate logistic regression was used to predict outcomes. Respondents reporting more time in the US were more likely to report access to medical care and to report getting a cancer screening exam. Regardless of time in the US, respondents reporting access had similar test rates. Regression results indicate that time in the US and primary language were not significant relative to use of cancer screening tests, but access to care was. Cancer screening tests that are covered by Every Woman Counts, California’s breast and cervical cancer early detection program, had smaller gaps among groups than colorectal cancer screening which is not covered by a program. California is the only state with a survey able to monitor changes in small population groups. Understanding barriers specific to subgroups is key to developing appropriate policy and interventions to increase use of cancer screening exams.

Keywords

Mexican-American Mammography Pap FOBT Colorectal endoscopy Access to care Immigration Language Cancer testing CHIS 

References

  1. 1.
    Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003;97:1528–40. doi:10.1002/cncr.11208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L. Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:159–70. doi:10.1023/B:CACO.0000019496.30145.62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kagawa-Singer M, Pourat N. Asian American and Pacific Islander breast and cervical carcinoma screening rates and Healthy People 2000 objectives. Cancer. 2000;89:696–705. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<696::AID-CNCR27>3.0.CO;2-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goel MS, Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Ngo-Metzger Q, Phillips RS. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening: the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:1028–35. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.20807.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harmon MP, Castro FG, Coe K. Acculturation and cervical cancer: knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors of Hispanic women. Women Health. 1996;24:37–57. doi:10.1300/J013v24n03_03.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernandez LE, Morales A. Language and use of cancer screening services among border and non-border Hispanic Texas women. Ethn Health. 2007;12:245–63. doi:10.1080/13557850701235150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen TU, Tanjasiri SP, Kagawa-Singer M, Tran JH, Foo MA. Community health navigators for breast- and cervical-cancer screening among Cambodian and Laotian women: intervention strategies and relationship-building processes. Health Promot Pract. 2008;9(4):356–67.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zambrana RE, Breen N, Fox SA, Gutierrez-Mohamed ML. Use of cancer screening practices by Hispanic women: analyses by subgroup. Prev Med. 1999;29:466–77. doi:10.1006/pmed.1999.0566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carrasquillo O, Pati S. The role of health insurance on Pap smear and mammography utilization by immigrants living in the United States. Prev Med. 2004;39:943–50. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suarez L, & Pulley L. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995;18:41–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Gammon MD. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and non-Latina whites. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1393–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perez-Stable EJ, Marin G, Marin BV. Behavioral risk factors: a comparison of Latinos and non-Latino whites in San Francisco. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:971–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Richards T, Wilson KM. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Hispanic and non-Hispanic women residing near the United States-Mexico border, 1999–2000. Fam Community Health. 2003;26:130–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perez-Stable EJ, Otero-Sabogal R, Sabogal F, McPhee SJ, Hiatt RA. Self-reported use of cancer screening tests among Latinos and Anglos in a prepaid health plan. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1073–81. doi:10.1001/archinte.154.10.1073.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hunt LM, Schneider S, Comer B. Should “acculturation” be a variable in health research? A critical review of research on US Hispanics. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:973–86. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramirez AG, Talavera GA, Villarreal R, Suarez L, McAlister A, Trapido E, et al. Breast cancer screening in regional Hispanic populations. Health Educ Res. 2000;15:559–68. doi:10.1093/her/15.5.559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carrasquillo O, Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S, Bor DH. Trends in health insurance coverage, 1989–1997. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29:467–83. doi:10.2190/1AV3-E901-TN3D-3H38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown ER, Lavarreda SA, Ponce N, Yoon J, Cummings J, Rice T. The state of health insurance in California: findings from the 2005 California Health Interview Survey. Available at: http://www.healthpolicy.ucla.edu/pubs/publication.asp?pubID=226. Accessed on April 28, 2008.
  19. 19.
    Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1704–13. doi:10.1093/jnci/93.22.1704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1–10. doi:10.2307/2137284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phillips KA, Morrison KR, Andersen R, Aday LA. Understanding the context of healthcare utilization: assessing environmental and provider-related variables in the behavioral model of utilization. Health Serv Res. 1998;33:571–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coughlin SS, Breslau ES, Thompson T, Benard VB. Physician recommendation for Papanicolaou testing among U.S. women, 2000. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1143–8. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ponce NA, Chawla N, Babey SH, Gatchell MS, Etzioni DA, Spencer BA, et al. Is there a language divide in Pap test use? Med Care. 2006;44:998–1004. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000233676.61237.ef.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kagawa-Singer M, Pourat N, Breen N, Coughlin S, Abend MT, McNeel TS, et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening rates of subgroups of Asian American women in California. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:706–30. doi:10.1177/1077558707304638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: report 5-weighting and variance estimation. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: report 4-response rates. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2002.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System summary data quality report. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. The CHIS 2001 sample: response rate and representativeness. Technical paper No. 1. Available at: http://www.chis.ucla.edu/pdf/2001_response_representativeness.pdf. Accessed on April 28, 2008.
  29. 29.
    UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: report 2-data collection methods. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2002.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series: report 1-sample design. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2002.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. California Health Interview Survey: technical report. CHIS 2001 Methodology Series: Revised CHIS 2001 Weights. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2005.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    LeClere FB, Jensen L, Biddlecom AE. Health care utilization, family context, and adaptation among immigrants to the United States. J Health Soc Behav. 1994;35:370–84. doi:10.2307/2137215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm. Accessed on April 28, 2008.
  34. 34.
    Hiatt RA, Klabunde C, Breen N, Swan J, Ballard-Barbash R. Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: past, present, and future. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1837–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of health surveys. New York: Wiley; 1999.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    SAS Institute I. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc; 1999.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shah BV, Barnwell G, Bieler GS. SUDAAN user’s manual, release 8.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1997.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ponce NA, Babey SH, Etzioni DA, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Chawla N. Cancer screening in California: findings from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2003.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Valdespino JL, Olaiz G, López-Barajas MP, Mendoza L, Palma O, Velázquez O, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2000. Tomo I. Vivienda, población y utilización de servicios de salud. [housing, population and utilization of health services]. Cuernavaca, Morelos, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2003.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb DG, Howlader N, Horner MJ, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2005. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/. Accessed on April 23, 2008.
  41. 41.
    Lazcano-Ponce EC, Moss S, Alonso de Ruiz R, Castro JS, Hernandez AM. Cervical cancer screening in developing countries: why is it ineffective? The case of Mexico. Arch Med Res. 1999;30:240–50. doi:10.1016/S0188-0128(99)00006-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Etzioni DA, Ponce NA, Babey SH, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Ko CY, et al. A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2004;101:2523–32. doi:10.1002/cncr.20692.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pollack LA, Blackman DK, Wilson KM, Seeff LC, Nadel MR. Colorectal cancer test use among Hispanic and non-Hispanic U.S. populations. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3:A50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, Thompson T, Shapiro JA, Vernon SW, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer. 2004;100:2093–103. doi:10.1002/cncr.20276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:389–94. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Skaer TL, Robison LM, Sclar DA, Harding GH. Cancer-screening determinants among Hispanic women using migrant health clinics. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1996;7:338–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Gates CY. Acculturation and cancer screening among Latinas: results from the National Health Interview Survey. Ann Behav Med. 2005;29:22–8. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2901_4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Florez KR. Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation? Implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1243–55. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brach C, Fraser I. Reducing disparities through culturally competent health care: an analysis of the business case. Qual Manag Health Care. 2002;10:15–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Brach C, Fraser I, Paez K. Crossing the language chasm. Health Aff (Project Hope). 2005;24:424–34. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yoon J, Grumbach K, Bindman AB. Access to Spanish-speaking physicians in California: supply, insurance, or both. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17:165–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bindman AB, Yoon J, Grumbach K. Trends in physician participation in Medicaid. The California experience. J Ambul Care Manage. 2003;26:334–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Cancer Institute 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Breen
    • 1
  • Sowmya R. Rao
    • 2
  • Helen I. Meissner
    • 3
  1. 1.Health Services and Economics Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteRockvilleUSA
  2. 2.Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Institute for Health PolicyBostonUSA
  3. 3.Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations