Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 269–280 | Cite as

Promoting the Occupational Health of Indigenous Farmworkers

  • Stephanie Farquhar
  • Julie Samples
  • Santiago Ventura
  • Shelley Davis
  • Michelle Abernathy
  • Linda McCauley
  • Nancy Cuilwik
  • Nargess Shadbeh
Original Paper

Abstract

In the United States, approximately 78% of agricultural farmworkers are immigrants. In Oregon, a growing number of these farmworkers are indigenous and speak an indigenous language as their primary language. This group of farmworkers suffers from linguistic, cultural and geographic isolation and faces a unique set of challenges yet little has been done to identify their health needs. Using data from focus groups, partners from this community-based participatory research project examined indigenous farmworkers’ concerns regarding occupational injury and illness, experiences of discrimination and disrespect, and language and cultural barriers. The data revealed examples of disrespect and discrimination based on the languages and cultures of indigenous farmworkers, and a lack of basic occupational health and safety information and equipment. For example, participants mentioned that occupational safety information was inaccessible because it was rarely provided in indigenous languages, and participants felt there were no legal means to protect farmworkers from occupational hazards. Community-based strategies designed to address the occupational health status of farmworkers must consider the unique circumstances of those farmworkers who do not speak Spanish or English.

Keywords

Indigenous farmworkers Pesticides Community-based participatory research Occupational health Agricultural work Discrimination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Grant #R25-OH008334-01). Special thanks to Sue Plaster and Maria Cortes del Rojas with Salud Medical Center in Woodburn, Oregon for their feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Department of Labor: Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) 2001–2002: a demographic and employment profile of United States farm workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Office of Programmatic Policy; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Commission on Agricultural Workers: Report of the commission of agricultural workers. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stephen L. Globalization, the state, and the creation of flexible indigenous workers: Mixtec farmworkers in Oregon. Urban Anthropol Stud Cult Syst World Econ Dev 2001;30:189–214.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larson A. Migrant and seasonal farmworker enumeration profiles study: Oregon. Portland (OR): Department of Human Services Migrant Health Office; 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCauley L. Work characteristics, pesticide exposures among migrant agricultural families: a community-based research approach. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109(5):533–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCauley L, Stickler D, Bryan C, Lasarev MR, Scherer JA. Pesticide knowledge and risk perception among adolescent Latino farmworkers. J Agric Saf Health 2002;8(4):397–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stephen L. Mixtec farmworkers in Oregon: linking labor and ethnicity through farmworker unions and hometown associations. In: Fox J, Rivera-Salgado G, editors. Indigenous Mexican Migrants in the United States. Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, Center for Comparative Immigration Studies. San Diego: University of California; 2004. p. 179–202.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oregon State Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) Report Catalog [database on the Internet]. Salem (OR): Oregon State DCBS. C2006—[cited 2006 Feb 14]. Available from: http://www.4.cbs.state.or.us/ex/imd/reports/rpt/index.cfm.
  9. 9.
    National Safety Council: Injury Facts (2005–2006 Edition). Itasca, IL: NSC Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics. National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2001. Accessed June 19th, 1006 at http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfnr0008.pdf.
  11. 11.
    Reeves M, Schafer KS. Greater risks, fewer rights: U.S. farmworkers and pesticides. Int J Occup Environ Health 2003;9:30–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Villarejo D, Baron S. The occupational health status of hired farm workers. Occup Med 1999;14(3):613–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arcury TA, Quandt SA. Occupational and environmental health risks in farm labor. Hum Organ 1998;57:331–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reigart R, Robert J. Recognition, management of pesticide poisonings. 5th ed. Washington DC.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zahm SH, Blair A. Cancer among migrant and seasonal farmworkers: an epidemiologic review and research agenda. Am J Ind Med 1993;24:753–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mills PK, Kwong S. Cancer incidence in the United Farm Workers of America (UFW):1987–1997. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:596–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thompson B, Coronado GD, Grossman JE, Puschel K, Solomon CC, Islas I, Curl CL, Shirai JH, Kissel JC, Fenske RA. Pesticide take-home pathway among children of agricultural workers. Stud Design Method Baseline Find 2003;45:42–53.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cameron L, Lalich N, Bauer S, Booker V, Bogue HO, Samuels S, Steege AL. Occupational health survey of farm workers by camp health aides. J Agric Saf Health 2006;12(2):139–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Cravey AJ, Elmore RC, Russell GB. Farmworker reports of pesticide safety and sanitation in the work environment. Am J Ind Med 2001;39:487–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Austin C, Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Preisser JS, Saavedra RM, Cabrera LF. Training farmworkers about pesticide safety: issues of control. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2001;12(2):236–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salazar MK, Keifer M, Negrete M, Estrada F, Synder K. Occupational risk among orchard workers. Fam Community Health 2005;28(3):239–252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strong LL, Thompson B, Coronado GD, Griffith WC, Vigoren EM, Islas I. Health symptoms and exposure to organophosphate pesticides in farmworkers. Am J Ind Med 2004;46:599–606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams DR, Neighbors HW, Jackson JS. Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: findings from community studies. Am J Public Health 2003;93:200–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krieger N. Discrimination and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 36–75.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alderete E, Vega WA, Kolody B, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. Depressive symptomatology: prevalence and psychosocial risk factors among Mexican American migrant farmworkers in California. J Community Psychol 1999;27(4):457–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, Becker A. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1998;19:173–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures, techniques. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications; 1990.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dye JF, Schatz IM, Rosenberg BA, Coleman ST: Constant comparison method: a kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report [On-line serial] 2000; 4(1/2). (Accessed at http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4–1/dye.html).
  29. 29.
    Northwest Federation of Community Organizations. In our Own Words: Immigrants’ Experiences in the Northwest; 2006.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murray LR. Sick and tired of being sick and tired: scientific evidence, methods, and research implications for racial and ethnic disparities in occupational health. Am J Public Health 2003;93(2):221–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J, Marmot M. Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health 1998;88(1):68–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holmes SM. An ethnographic study of the social context of migrant health in the United States. Plos Medicine 2006;3(10):1776–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Salazar MK, Napolitano M, Scherer JA, McCauley L. Hispanic Adolescent farmworkers’ perceptions associated with pesticide exposure. West J Nurs Res 2004;26(2):146–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Russell GB. Pesticide safety among farmworkers: Perceived risk and perceived control as factors reflecting environmental justice. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110(S2):233–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yin R. Case-study research: design and methods. 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Farquhar
    • 1
  • Julie Samples
    • 2
  • Santiago Ventura
    • 2
  • Shelley Davis
    • 3
  • Michelle Abernathy
    • 1
  • Linda McCauley
    • 4
  • Nancy Cuilwik
    • 1
  • Nargess Shadbeh
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Community HealthPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Law CenterWoodburnUSA
  3. 3.Farmworker JusticeWashington, D.CUSA
  4. 4.School of NursingUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations