Journal of Immigrant Health

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 103–108 | Cite as

Paan and Gutka in the United States: An Emerging Threat



Smokeless tobacco and areca nut usage are integral cultural traditions in South Asia. Paan and gutka are two commonly used products which contain these ingredients. They are immensely popular in South Asia and with South Asian immigrants. Regular paan and gutka use is associated with several deleterious health consequences, most significantly oral cancer. Of particular concern is the markedly increased risk of oral cancer in South Asian immigrants when compared with the natives in new areas of settlement. The South Asian community in the United States is large and rapidly growing. Paan and gutka are legal in the United States, and readily available in ethnic enclaves. Smokeless tobacco prevention and cessation research and interventions have not yet addressed the unique sociocultural circumstances of this growing, at-risk community. The medical, dental, and public health communities need to join forces to combat this emerging threat.


South Asian immigrants tobacco oral cancer 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    International Agency for Research on Cancer: Betel-quid and areca-nut chewing and some arecanut related nitrosamines. IARC Monographs Vol. 85, October 2004Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Union Internationale Contre de Cancer (International Union Against Cancer): Tobacco Control Fact Sheet 17, 1996Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lord GA, Lim CK, Warnakulasuriya S, Peters, TJ: Chemical and analytical aspects of areca nut. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):99–102Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strickland S: Anthropological perspectives on the use of areca nut. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):85–97Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Croucher R, Islam S: Socio-economic aspects of areca nut use. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):139–146Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaudhry K: Is pan masala-containing tobacco carcinogenic? Natl Med J India 1999; 12(1):21–27Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patel DR, Greydanus DE: Substance abuse: A pediatric concern. Indian J Pediatr 1999; 66(4):557–567Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asian Quitline: Oral cancers—paan and tobacco chewing fact sheet. Last accessed on August 9, 2002, from
  9. 9.
    Waldman A: Sweet but deadly addiction is seizing the young in India. New York Times, August 13, 2002Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chu NS: Neurological aspects of areca and betel chewing. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):111–114Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Winstock AR, Trivedy CR, Warnakulasuriya KAAS, Peters TJ: A dependency syndrome related to areca nut use: Some medical and psychological aspects among areca nut users in the Gujarat community in the UK. Addict Biol 2000; 5(2):173–179Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Indian Express Newspapers, Bombay, India: Tobacco—the fatal fix. Express News Service, July 9, 1999Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trivedy C, Warnakulasuriya S, Peters TJ: Areca nuts have deleterious effects. BMJ 1999; 318(7193):1287Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Indian Council of Medical Research: National Cancer Registry Programme, 1996Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murti PR, Gupta PC, Bhonsle RB: Smokeless tobacco use in India: Effects on oral mucosa. In: Stotts RC, Schroeder KL, Burns DM, eds. Smokeless Tobacco or Health (NIH Publication No. 92-3461). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health (NCI); 1992:51–65Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gupta PC: Mouth cancer in India: A new epidemic? J Indian Med Assoc 1999; 97(9):370–373Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhisey RA, Ramchandani AG, D’Souza AV, Borges AM, Notani PN: Long-term carcinogenicity of pan masala in Swiss mice. Int J Cancer 1999; 83(5):679–684Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mehta FS, Maner J: Leukoplakia in tobacco related oral mucosal lesions and conditions in India. Bombay: Basic Dental Research Unit 1993; 28–46Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson NW, Ranasinghe AW, Warnakulasuriya KAAS: Potentially malignant lesions and conditions of the mouth and oropharynx: Natural history—cellular and molecular markers of risk. Eur J Cancer Prev 1993; 2:31–51Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trivedy CR, Craig G, Warnakulasuriya S: The oral health consequences of chewing areca nut. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):115–125Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van der Waal I, Schepman KP, van der Meij EH, Smeele LE: Oral leukoplakia: A clinicopathological review. Oral Oncol 1997; 33(5):291–301Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Babu S, Bhat RV, Kumar PU, Sesikaran B, Rao KV, Aruna P, Reddy PR: A comparative clinico-pathological study of oral submucous fibrosis in habitual chewers of pan masala and betelquid. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34(3):317–322Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gupta PC, Nandakumar A: Oral cancer scene in India. Oral Dis 1999; 5(1):1–2Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Murti PR, Bhonsle RB, Pindborg JJ: Malignant transformation rate in oral submucous fibrosis over a 17-year period. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985; 13(6):340–341Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murti PR, Bhonsle RB, Gupta PC: Etiology of oral submucous fibrosis with special reference to the role of areca nut chewing. J Oral Pathol Med 1995; 24:145–152Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shah N, Sharma PP: Role of chewing and smoking habits in the etiology of oral submucous fibrosis: A case-control study. J Oral Pathol Med 1998; 27:475–479Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Warnakulasuriya KAAS, Trivedy C, Maher R, Johnson NW: Aetiology of oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Dis 1997; 3:286–287Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S: Global epidemiology of areca nut usage. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):77–83Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mahmood Z, Jaferey NA, Samiuddin M, Malik S, Qureshi SA: Dietary and other habits of people of Karachi. J Pakistan Med Assoc 1974; 26:222–229Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Malaowalla AM, Silverman S, Mani NJ, Bilimoria KF, Smith LW: Oral cancer in 57,518 industrial workers of Gujarat, India. Cancer 1976; 37:1882–1886Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mehta FS, Pindborg JJ, Gupta PC: Epidemiologic and histologic study of oral cancer and leukoplakia among 50,915 villagers in India. Cancer 1969; 24(4):832–849Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gupta PC: Socio-demographic characteristic of tobacco use among 99,598 individuals in Bombay, India using hand-held computers. Tob Control 1996; 5(2):114–120Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumar S: Indian state bans tobacco based chewing products. BMJ 2002; 325(7357):184Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bagchi M, Balmoori J, Bagchi D, Chakrabarti J, Das DK, Stohs SJ: Role of reactive oxygen species in the development of cytotoxicity with various forms of chewing tobacco and pan masala. Toxicology 2002; 179(3):247–255Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wikipedia: Last accessed on November 19, 2002, from
  36. 36.
    Atwal GS, Warnakulasuriya KAAS, Gelbier S: Betel quid (pan) chewing habits among a sample of south Asians. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1151Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bedi R, Gilthorpe MS: Betel-quid and tobacco chewing among the Bangladeshi community in areas of multiple deprivation. In: Bedi R, Jones P, eds. Betel-quid and Tobacco Chewing Among the Bangladeshi Community in the United Kingdom. London: Centre for Transcultural Oral Health; 1995:37–60Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pearson NK: Oral Health Status and Dental Treatment Needs of an Adult Bangladeshi Population Resident in Tower Hamlets, MSc Thesis, University of London, 1994Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ramanathan K: Oral precancerous conditions in Peninsular Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 1979; 33(2):216–221Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schonland MN, Bradshaw E: Upper alimentary tract cancer in Natal Indians with special reference to betel-chewing habits. Br J Cancer 1969; 23(4):670–682Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seedat HA, van Wyk CW: Betel-nut chewing and submucous fibrosis in Durban. S Afr Med J 1988; 74(11):568–571Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Summers RM, Williams SA, Curzon MEJ: The use of tobacco and betel quid (‘pan’) among Bangladeshi women in West Yorkshire. Community Dent Health 1994; 11(1):12–16Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shetty KV, Johnson NW: Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of adult south Asians living in London regarding risk factors and signs for oral cancer. Community Dent Health 1999; 16(4):227–231Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vora AR, Yeoman CM, Hayter JP: Alcohol, tobacco and paan use and understanding of oral cancer risk among Asian males in Leicester. Br Dent J 2000; 188(8):444–451Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Warnakulasuriya KAAS, Johnson NW: Epidemiology and risk factors for oral cancer: Rising trends in Europe and possible effects of migration. Int Dent J 1996; 46:245–250Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Warnakulasuriya S: Areca nut use following migration and its consequences. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):127–132Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Farrand P, Rowe RM, Johnston A, Murdoch H: Prevalence, age of onset and demographic relationships of different areca nut habits among children in Tower Hamlets, London. Br Dent J 2001; 190(3):150–154Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Osman S, Warknakulasuriya S, Cooper D, Gelbier S: Betel quid chewing and tobacco habits among Asian children. J Dent Res 1997; 76:1054.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Prabhu NT, Warnakulasuriya KAAS, Gelbier S, Robinson PG: Betel quid and chewing among Bangladeshi adolescents living in East London. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11(1):18–24.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Omar-Ahmed U, Ramanathan K: Oral carcinoma in States of Malaya: A review of the etiological factors and preventive programme. Med J Malaya 1968; 22:172–180Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Swerdlow AJ, Marmot MG, Grulich AE, Head J: Cancer mortality in Indian and British ethnic immigrants from the Indian subcontinent to England and Wales. Br J Cancer 1995; 72(5):1312–1319Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Van Wyk CW, Stander I, Padayachee A, Grobler-Rabie AF: The areca nut chewing habit and oral squamous cell carcinoma in South African Indians. S Afr Med J 1993; 83(6):425–429Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Immigration and Naturalization Service, Statistics Division, Office of Policy and Planning, United States Department of Justice: Annual Report: Legal Immigration, Fiscal Year 2001. August 2002Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    U.S. Census Bureau: The Asian Population: 2000 C2KBR/01-16. U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration, February 2002Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    U.S. Census Bureau: Summary Tape File 1: Table PCT 5 Asian Alone with One Asian Category for Selected Groups, Census 2000Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    India Abroad Center for Political Awareness: Indian American Population in the Largest Metropolitan Areas in the United States (Analysis of Census 2000). Last accessed on November 5, 2003, from census2000metropop.htmGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    South Asian Public Health Association: A Brown Paper: The Health of South Asians in the United States. South Asian Public Health Association; November 2002Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Knight D: Neighborhood Report: Jackson Heights: To Asians a Spicy Chew, to Doctors a Deadly Habit. New York Times, November 10, 2002Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Virasami B: Indian Chew Poses Health Risk. Newsday, August 27, 2002Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Winstock AR: Areca nut-abuse liability, dependence and public health. Addict Biol 2002; 7(1):133–138Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Immigrant HealthNew York University School of MedicineNew York
  2. 2.OBV-CD-402New York

Personalised recommendations