Advertisement

Contextual Social Trust and Well-Being Inequality: From the Perspectives of Education and Income

  • Naoki AkaedaEmail author
Research Paper
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

In recent decades, much attention has been paid to subjective well-being (SWB). Extensive research in several fields has frequently examined the determinants of SWB, and previous studies have reported well-being inequality within countries due to education and household income. However, knowledge regarding how well-being inequality due to education and household income varies among countries is limited. To fill this gap, this paper examines whether contextual social trust as a country characteristic reduces well-being inequality due to education and household income. This analysis employs repeated cross-sectional international comparative data from four waves of the European Quality of Life Survey conducted between 2003 and 2016 and two types of multilevel modeling, namely, three-level multilevel models with year fixed effects and cross-classified full models, to examine the cross-level interaction effects of contextual social trust and education and of contextual social trust and household income on SWB. By conducting an international comparative analysis, the present study has found that contextual social trust has negative moderation effects on the association between education and SWB and the association between household income and SWB. These results indicate that high contextual social trust reduces well-being inequality due to education and household income by improving the SWB of citizens with lower positions.

Keywords

Contextual social capital Well-being inequality Education Household income Comparative longitudinal survey data Three-level multilevel modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions offered by Nadine Schöneck.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10902_2019_209_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (432 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 431 kb)

References

  1. Alesina, A., di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics,88(9–10), 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvarez-Gálvez, J., & Jaime-Castillo, A. M. (2018). The impact of social expenditure on health inequalities in Europe. Social Science and Medicine,200, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, S. H. (2009). Unemployment and subjective well-being: A question of class? Work and Occupations,36(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjørnskov, C. (2003). The happy few: Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos,56(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjørnskov, C. (2006). The multiple facets of social capital. European Journal of Political Economy,22(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social capital and happiness in the United States. Applied Research in Quality of Life,3(1), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2007). The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice,130(3/4), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2010). Formal institutions and subjective well-being: Revisiting the cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy,26(4), 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics,88(7–8), 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature,46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuñado, J., & de Gracia, F. P. (2012). Does education affect happiness? Evidence for Spain. Social Indicators Research,108(1), 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deeming, C., & Hayes, D. (2012). Worlds of welfare capitalism and wellbeing: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Social Policy,41(4), 811–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delhey, J. (2004). Quality of life in Europe: Life satisfaction in an enlarged Europe. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2004/quality-of-life-social-policies/life-satisfaction-in-an-enlarged-europe-report. Accessed 16 Nov 2018.
  15. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2014). Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: The role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. European Sociological Review,30(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2016). Happier together. Social cohesion and subjective well-being in Europe. International Journal of Psychology,51(3), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delhey, J., & Kohler, U. (2011). Is happiness inequality immune to income inequality? New evidence through instrument-effect-corrected standard deviations. Social Science Research,40(3), 742–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 463–473). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology,29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgässner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2007). Is it culture or democracy? The impact of democracy and culture on happiness. Social Indicators Research,82(3), 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan, O. D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In J. Reiss (Ed.), Occupations and social status (pp. 109–138). New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  22. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of moses abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,27(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Engström, K., Mattsson, F., Järleborg, A., & Hallqvist, J. (2008). Contextual social capital as a risk factor for poor self-rated health: A multilevel analysis. Social Science and Medicine,66(11), 2268–2280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. (2018). European Quality of Life Survey Integrated Data File, 2003-2016. [data collection]. 3rd Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 7348.  https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7348-3.
  26. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2019). European quality of life surveys (EQLS). https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-quality-of-life-surveys. Accessed 2 Mar 2019.
  27. Fahey, T., & Smyth, E. (2004). Do subjective indicators measure welfare? Evidence from 33 European societies. European Societies,6(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics,89(5), 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal,114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flavin, P., Pacek, A. C., & Radcliff, B. (2014). Assessing the impact of the size and scope of government on human well-being. Social Forces,92(4), 1241–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Maximising happiness? German Economic Review,1(2), 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. The American Economic Review,94(3), 730–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., de Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research,21(1), 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gerdtham, U.-G., & Johannesson, M. (2001). The relationship between happiness, health, and socio-economic factors: Results based on Swedish microdata. The Journal of Socio-Economics,30(6), 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gow, A. J., Pattie, A., Whiteman, M. C., Whalley, L. J., & Deary, I. J. (2007). Social support and successful aging: Investigating the relationships between lifetime cognitive change and life satisfaction. Journal of Individual Differences,28(3), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wooden, M. (2008). Money does not buy happiness: Or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Social Indicators Research,87(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. Economic Record,80(s1), S24–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heisig, J. P., & Schaeffer, M. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review,35(2), 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling,20(2), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2016a). The distribution of world happiness. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report update 2016. New York, NY: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  41. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2016b). New results on trust and well-being. NBER working paper no. 22450. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  42. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well–being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences,359(1449), 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2011). Trust and well-being. International Journal of Well-Being,1(1), 42–78.Google Scholar
  44. Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2005). Measuring inequality of happiness in nations: In search for proper statistics. Journal of Happiness Studies,6(4), 357–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital and health. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kawachi, I., Kim, D., Coutts, A., & Subramanian, S. V. (2004). Commentary: Reconciling the three accounts of social capital. International Journal of Epidemiology,33(4), 682–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Kim, D. (Eds.). (2008). Social capital and health. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Lee, K. S., & Ono, H. (2012). Marriage, cohabitation, and happiness: A cross-national analysis of 27 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family,74(5), 953–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marx, P., & Nguyen, C. (2016). Are the unemployed less politically involved? A comparative study of internal political efficacy. European Sociological Review,32(5), 634–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ngamaba, K. H., Panagioti, M., & Armitage, C. J. (2018). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research,27(3), 577–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nguyen, C. (2017). Labour market insecurity and generalized trust in welfare state context. European Sociological Review,33(2), 225–239.Google Scholar
  52. Ono, H., & Lee, K. S. (2013). Welfare states and the redistribution of happiness. Social Forces,92(2), 789–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ott, J. (2005). Level and inequality of happiness in nations: Does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness? Journal of Happiness Studies,6(4), 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paskov, M. (2016). Is solidarity less important and less functional in egalitarian contexts? Acta Sociologica,59(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paskov, M., Gërxhani, K., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2016). Giving up on the joneses? The relationship between income inequality and status-seeking. European Sociological Review,33(1), 112–123.Google Scholar
  56. Poortinga, W. (2006). Social capital: An individual or collective resource for health? Social Science and Medicine,62(2), 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology,24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum,15(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. The Journal of Socio-Economics,37(4), 1459–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  62. Putnam, R. D., & Goss, K. A. (2002). Introduction. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Quick, A. (2015). Inequalities in wellbeing: Challenges and opportunities for research and policy. https://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/e99d6e3014fff0356e_lqm6i2tiw.pdf. Accesses 16 Nov 2018.
  64. Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets, and life satisfaction: The political economy of human happiness. The American Political Science Review,95(4), 939–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ram, R. (2010). Social capital and happiness: Additional cross-country evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies,11(4), 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & von Berlepsch, V. (2014). Social capital and individual happiness in Europe. Journal of Happiness Studies,15(2), 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rostila, M. (2007). Social capital and health in European welfare regimes: a multilevel approach. Journal of European Social Policy,17(3), 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Samuel, R., & Hadjar, A. (2016). How welfare-state regimes shape subjective well-being across Europe. Social Indicators Research,129(2), 565–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmidt-Catran, A. W., & Fairbrother, M. (2015). The random effects in multilevel models: Getting them wrong and getting them right. European Sociological Review,32(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schyns, P. (2002). Wealth of nations, individual income andlife satisfaction in 42 countries:a multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research,60(1), 5–40.Google Scholar
  71. Selezneva, E. (2011). Surveying transitional experience and subjective well-being: Income, work, family. Economic Systems,35(2), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Solt, F. (2009a). The standardized world income inequality database. Harvard Dataverse, V20, 97(5), 1267–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Solt, F. (2009b). Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly,90(2), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly,97(5), 1267–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Subramanian, S., Kim, D., & Kawachi, I. (2005). Covariation in the socioeconomic determinants of self rated health and happiness: A multivariate multilevel analysis of individuals and communities in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,59(8), 664–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. United Nations (2018). The national accounts main aggregates database. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  77. Uphoff, E. P., Pickett, K. E., Cabieses, B., Small, N., & Wright, J. (2013). A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: A contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities. International Journal for Equity in Health,12(1), 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Uslaner, E. M. (1999). Democracy and social capital. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 121–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. van der Wel, K. A. (2007). Social capital and health: A multilevel analysis of 25 administrative districts in Oslo. Norsk Epidemiologi,17(1), 71–78.Google Scholar
  80. Vanassche, S., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Marriage and children as a key to happiness? Cross-national differences in the effects of marital status and children on well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,14(2), 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Winkelmann, R. (2009). Unemployment, social capital, and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,10(4), 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yang, Y. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review,73(2), 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zagorski, K., Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Piotrowska, K. (2014). Does national income inequality affect individuals’ quality of life in Europe? Inequality, happiness, finances, and health. Social Indicators Research,117(3), 1089–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of SociologyKansai UniversitySuita-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations