Contextual Social Trust and Well-Being Inequality: From the Perspectives of Education and Income
- 76 Downloads
In recent decades, much attention has been paid to subjective well-being (SWB). Extensive research in several fields has frequently examined the determinants of SWB, and previous studies have reported well-being inequality within countries due to education and household income. However, knowledge regarding how well-being inequality due to education and household income varies among countries is limited. To fill this gap, this paper examines whether contextual social trust as a country characteristic reduces well-being inequality due to education and household income. This analysis employs repeated cross-sectional international comparative data from four waves of the European Quality of Life Survey conducted between 2003 and 2016 and two types of multilevel modeling, namely, three-level multilevel models with year fixed effects and cross-classified full models, to examine the cross-level interaction effects of contextual social trust and education and of contextual social trust and household income on SWB. By conducting an international comparative analysis, the present study has found that contextual social trust has negative moderation effects on the association between education and SWB and the association between household income and SWB. These results indicate that high contextual social trust reduces well-being inequality due to education and household income by improving the SWB of citizens with lower positions.
KeywordsContextual social capital Well-being inequality Education Household income Comparative longitudinal survey data Three-level multilevel modeling
The author is grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions offered by Nadine Schöneck.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- Delhey, J. (2004). Quality of life in Europe: Life satisfaction in an enlarged Europe. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2004/quality-of-life-social-policies/life-satisfaction-in-an-enlarged-europe-report. Accessed 16 Nov 2018.
- Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 463–473). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Duncan, O. D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In J. Reiss (Ed.), Occupations and social status (pp. 109–138). New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of moses abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. (2018). European Quality of Life Survey Integrated Data File, 2003-2016. [data collection]. 3rd Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 7348. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7348-3.
- European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2019). European quality of life surveys (EQLS). https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-quality-of-life-surveys. Accessed 2 Mar 2019.
- Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2016a). The distribution of world happiness. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report update 2016. New York, NY: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2016b). New results on trust and well-being. NBER working paper no. 22450. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2011). Trust and well-being. International Journal of Well-Being,1(1), 42–78.Google Scholar
- Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital and health. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Kim, D. (Eds.). (2008). Social capital and health. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, C. (2017). Labour market insecurity and generalized trust in welfare state context. European Sociological Review,33(2), 225–239.Google Scholar
- Paskov, M., Gërxhani, K., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2016). Giving up on the joneses? The relationship between income inequality and status-seeking. European Sociological Review,33(1), 112–123.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Quick, A. (2015). Inequalities in wellbeing: Challenges and opportunities for research and policy. https://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/e99d6e3014fff0356e_lqm6i2tiw.pdf. Accesses 16 Nov 2018.
- Schyns, P. (2002). Wealth of nations, individual income andlife satisfaction in 42 countries:a multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research,60(1), 5–40.Google Scholar
- United Nations (2018). The national accounts main aggregates database. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp. Accessed 28 May 2018.
- Uphoff, E. P., Pickett, K. E., Cabieses, B., Small, N., & Wright, J. (2013). A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: A contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities. International Journal for Equity in Health,12(1), 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van der Wel, K. A. (2007). Social capital and health: A multilevel analysis of 25 administrative districts in Oslo. Norsk Epidemiologi,17(1), 71–78.Google Scholar