Do(n’t) Worry, It’s Temporary: The Effects of Fixed-Term Employment on Affective Well-Being

  • Paul SchumannEmail author
  • Lars Kuchinke
Research Paper


This paper examines the impact of fixed-term employment on the affective and cognitive well-being of employees operationalized by the subjective frequency of the basic emotions of happiness, sadness, fear and anger as well as life satisfaction. Longitudinal effects were analysed across 10 waves of sampling from the Socio-Economic Panel, an annual representative survey in Germany. Random effects within between model analyses were applied to examine differences between fixed-term and permanent workers as well as within effects of a change of contract type. In addition, the impact of the direction of contract type change was evaluated by examining subsamples with changes from fixed-term to permanent and vice versa. The results suggest that fixed-term employees’ affective well-being is lower, while cognitive well-being (or happiness) is hardly affected. A change from permanent to fixed-term contracts is associated with higher frequencies of self-reported fear and sadness experiences, while a change in the opposite direction results in lower frequencies. In addition, life satisfaction was only found to increase with the change from fixed-term to permanent employment. While the effect on fear is masked by job security, acting as a mediating factor, the effect on sadness remains significant when the model is controlled for job security. Thus, by treating cognitive and affective well-being as separate constructs this study provides new insights into the psychological costs of fixed-term contracts and reveals the strong impact of fixed-term employment on self-reported experiences of sadness.


Fixed-term employment Affective well-being Temporary employment Life satisfaction Subjective well-being 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship and publication of this article.


  1. Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models (Vol. 160). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amlinger-Chatterjee, M. (2016). Psychische Gesundheit in der Arbeitswelt- Atypische Arbeitszeiten. Berlin: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin.Google Scholar
  3. Amuedo-Dorantes, C. (2000). Work transitions into and out of involuntary temporary employment in a segmented market: Evidence from Spain. ILR Review, 53(2), 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, J. (1984). Manpower strategies for flexible organizations. Personnel Management, 16(8), 28–31.Google Scholar
  5. Bardasi, E., & Francesconi, M. (2004). The impact of atypical employment on individual well-being: Evidence from a panel of British workers. Social Science and Medicine, 58(9), 1671–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, A., Fairbrother, M., & Jones, K. (2016). Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Working paper.Google Scholar
  8. Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2002). Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? The Economic Journal, 112(480), F189–F213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyce, A. S., Ryan, A. M., Imus, A. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). “Temporary worker, permanent loser?” A model of the stigmatization of temporary workers. Journal of Management, 33(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brehmer, W., & Seifert, H. (2008). Sind atypische Beschäftigungsverhältnisse prekär? Eine empirische Analyse sozialer Risiken. Journal for Labour Market Research, 41(4), 501–531.Google Scholar
  11. Brüderl, J. (2010). Kausalanalyse mit Paneldaten. In C. Wolf & H. Best (Eds.), Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse (pp. 963–994). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chadi, A., & Hetschko, C. (2015). Flexibilization without hesitation? Temporary contracts and job satisfaction. Oxford Economic Papers, 68(1), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118(529), 222–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crößmann, A., Günther, L., & Marder-Puch, K. (2017). Qualität der Arbeit-Geld verdienen und was sonst noch zählt. Wiesbaden: Selbstverlag.Google Scholar
  15. Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12(3), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawson, C., Veliziotis, M., & Hopkins, B. (2017). Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being. Economic and industrial democracy, 38(1), 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Cuyper, N., De Jong, J., De Witte, H., Isaksson, K., Rigotti, T., & Schalk, R. (2008). Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2006). The impact of job insecurity and contract type on attitudes, well-being and behavioural reports: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(3), 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Cuyper, N., Notelaers, G., & De Witte, H. (2009). Transitioning between temporary and permanent employment: A two-wave study on the entrapment, the stepping stone and the selection hypothesis. Journal of occupational and organizational Psychology, 82(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Witte, H., & Näswall, K. (2003). Objective vs subjective job insecurity: Consequences of temporary work for job satisfaction and organizational commitment in four European countries. Economic and industrial democracy, 24(2), 149–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deutscher Bundestag. (2017). Kleine Anfrage. Drucksache, 18/11608. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.Google Scholar
  22. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2004). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advanced in Cell Aging and Gerontology, 15, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehrhardt, J. J., Saris, W. E., & Veenhoven, R. (2000). Stability of life-satisfaction over time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frijda, N. H. (1999). Emotions and hedonic experience. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 190–210). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giesecke, J. (2009). Socio-economic risks of atypical employment relationships: Evidence from the German labour market. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 629–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giesselmann, M., Staneva, M., Schupp, J., & Richter, D. (2017). Arbeitsmarktposition und Arbeitszufriedenheit: quer-und längsschnittliche Befunde auf Basis des Sozio-ökonomischen Panels (SOEP) (N. 929). SOEP papers on multidisciplinary panel data research. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  31. Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9(1), 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Green, C. P., & Heywood, J. S. (2011). Flexible contracts and subjective well-being. Economic Inquiry, 49(3), 716–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. (2017). Atypische Beschäftigung. Böckler Impuls. Ausgabe. 09. 2017. Retrieved February 28, 2018, from
  34. Hünefeld, L. (2016). Psychische Gesundheit in der Arbeitswelt-Atypische Beschäftigung. Berlin: Berlin: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin.Google Scholar
  35. Hünefeld, L., & Köper, B. (2016). Fixed-term employment and job insecurity (JI) as risk factors for mental health. A review of international study results. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 5(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
  36. Jahn, E. (2015). Don’t worry, be flexible?-job satisfaction among flexible workers. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 18(2), 147–190.Google Scholar
  37. Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s–2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Krause, T., & Urban, D. (2013). Panelanalysen mit Mehrebenenmodellen. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  39. Kristoffersen, I. (2010). The metrics of subjective wellbeing: Cardinality, neutrality and additivity. Economic Record, 86(272), 98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kröll, C., & Nüesch, S. (2019). The effects of flexible work practices on employee attitudes: evidence from a large-scale panel study in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(9), 1505–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuppens, P., Realo, A., & Diener, E. (2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Odenthal, C. (2017). The Hartz myth—A closer look at Germany’s labour market reforms. London: Centre for European Reform.Google Scholar
  43. Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2001). Pleasures and subjective well-being. European Journal of Personality, 15(2), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson, S., Lester, L., & Zhang, G. (2012). Are casual and contract terms of employment hazardous for mental health in Australia? Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(5), 557–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rigotti, T., & Mohr, G. (2017). German flexibility: Loosening the reins without losing control. In Employment contracts and well-being among European workers (pp. 81–108). Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Scherer, S. (2009). The social consequences of insecure jobs. Social Indicators Research, 93(3), 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schilling, O. (2006). Development of life satisfaction in old age: Another view on the” Paradox’’. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schimmack, U. (2008). Measuring wellbeing in the SOEP. SOEP papers on multidisciplinary panel data research, Berlin, paper 145.Google Scholar
  49. Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). Marriage matters spousal similarity in life satisfaction (no. 623). DIW discussion papers.Google Scholar
  50. Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schimmack, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). The influence of environment and personality on the affective and cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Silla, I., Gracia, F. J., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Job insecurity and health-related outcomes among different types of temporary workers. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26(1), 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). (2018). Data for years 1984–2016, version 33.1.
  55. Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., & Näswall, K. (2002). No security: A meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(3), 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vacas-Soriano, C. (2015). Recent developments in temporary employment: Employment growth, wages and transitions. Dublin: Eurofound.Google Scholar
  58. Virtanen, M., Kivimäki, M., Joensuu, M., Virtanen, P., Elovainio, M., & Vahtera, J. (2005). Temporary employment and health: A review. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(3), 610–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. von Scheve, C., Esche, F., & Schupp, J. (2017). The emotional timeline of unemployment: Anticipation, reaction, and adaptation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(4), 1231–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Voßemer, J., Gebel, M., Täht, K., Unt, M., Högberg, B., & Strandh, M. (2018). The effects of unemployment and insecure jobs on well-being and health: The moderating role of labor market policies. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 1229–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, evolution and enhancements. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar
  62. Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica, 65(257), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zeytinoglu, I., & Cooke, G. (2005). Non-standard work and benefits: Has anything changed since the Wallace Report? Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 60(1), 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zeytinoglu, I., & Muteshi, J. (2000). Gender, race and class dimensions of nonstandard work. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 55(1), 133–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Psychoanalytic University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations