Emotional Intelligence Structure and Its Relationship with Life Satisfaction and Happiness: New Findings from the Bifactor Model

  • Ana Blasco-BelledEmail author
  • Radosław Rogoza
  • Cristina Torrelles-Nadal
  • Carles Alsinet
Research Paper


Emotional intelligence (EI) has been found to generally predict subjective wellbeing (SWB) indicators such as life satisfaction and happiness. Concerning the specific abilities of trait EI, i.e., mood attention, emotional clarity and mood repair, research has largely demonstrated that emotional clarity and mood repair are the strongest predictors of SWB indicators, whereas mood attention has been relegated to a secondary role. To clarify previous inconsistencies, we tested EI by means of the bifactor model because it allows for a better comprehension of the complex nature of EI. The current paper was composed of two studies: Study 1 examined the prediction of SWB indicators by EI and its dimensions in the bifactor model; and Study 2 analysed the differences in EI and SWB indicators across university students and employees. Results of Study 1 demonstrated that the structure of EI is best represented by the bifactor model with a general e(motional)-factor and three specific emotional abilities. Mood attention was a negative predictor of SWB indicators, whereas mood repair was a positive predictor, and emotional clarity was non-significant. Study 2 showed that employees and university students did not differed in how EI predicted SWB indicators. These findings evidenced a shift in the study and measurement of EI. Further implications of this paper are discussed.


Emotional intelligence Subjective wellbeing Happiness Life satisfaction Bifactor model Measurement 



  1. Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2000). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in adolescents. Psicothema, 12, 314–319.Google Scholar
  2. Augusto-Landa, J. M., López-Zafra, E., De Antoñana, R. M., & Pulido, M. (2006). Perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction among university teachers. Psicothema, 18, 152–157.Google Scholar
  3. Augusto-Landa, J. M., Pulido-Martos, M., & López-Zafra, E. (2011). Does perceived emotional intelligence and optimism/pessimism predict psychological well-being? Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 463–474. Scholar
  4. Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bar-On, R. (2006). The bar-on model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, 13–25.Google Scholar
  6. Beaujean, A. (2015). John Carroll’s views on intelligence: Bi-factor vs. higher-order models. Journal of Intelligence, 3(4), 121–136. Scholar
  7. Boden, M. T., & Thompson, R. J. (2015). Facets of emotional awareness and associations with emotion regulation and depression. Emotion, 15, 399–410. Scholar
  8. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, J. B. (1996). A three-stratum theory of intelligence: Spearman’s contribution. In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 1–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 644–655. Scholar
  11. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. Scholar
  12. Chen, F. F., Bai, L., Lee, J. M., & Jing, Y. (2016a). Culture and the structure of affect: A bifactor modeling approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1801–1824. Scholar
  13. Chen, F. F., Jing, Y., Hayes, A., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1033–1068. Scholar
  14. Chen, Y., Peng, Y., & Fang, P. (2016b). Emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between age and subjective well-being. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 83(2), 91–107. Scholar
  15. Cucina, J., & Byle, K. (2017). The bifactor model fits better than the higher-order model in more than 90% of comparisons for mental abilities test batteries. Journal of Intelligence, 5(3), 27. Scholar
  16. Cummins, R. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225–256. Scholar
  17. Damasio, B. F., Hauck-Filho, N., & Koller, S. H. (2016). Measuring meaning in life: An empirical comparison of two well-known measures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 431–445. Scholar
  18. Delhom, I., Gutierrez, M., Lucas-Molina, B., & Meléndez, J. C. (2017). Emotional intelligence in older adults: psychometric properties of the TMMS-24 and relationship with psychological well-being and life satisfaction. International Psychogeriatrics, 29, 1–8. Scholar
  19. Diener, E. D. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. Scholar
  20. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. Scholar
  21. Diener, E. D., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. Scholar
  22. Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2014). The subjective happiness scale: Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Spanish version. Social Indicators Research, 119, 473–481. Scholar
  23. Extremera, N., Ruiz-Aranda, D., Pineda-Galán, C., & Salguero, J. M. (2011a). Emotional intelligence and its relation with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: A prospective study. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(1), 11–16. Scholar
  24. Extremera, N., Salguero, J. M., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2011b). Trait meta-mood and subjective happiness: A 7-week prospective study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 509–517. Scholar
  25. Fan, H. Y., Jackson, T., Yang, X. G., Tang, W. Q., & Zhang, J. F. (2010). The factor structure of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso emotional intelligence test V 2.0 (MSCEIT): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(7), 781–785. Scholar
  26. Fernández-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N., & Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the trait meta-mood scale. Psychological Reports, 94, 751–755. Scholar
  27. Fiori, M., Antonietti, J.-P., Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., Hansenne, M., & Rossier, J. (2014). What is the ability emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT) good for? An evaluation using item response theory. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e98827. Scholar
  28. Fontaine, J. R. J. (2016). Comment: Redefining emotional intelligence based on the componential emotion approach. Emotion Review, 8(4), 332–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frisby, C. L., & Beaujean, A. A. (2015). Testing Spearman’s hypotheses using a bi-factor model with WAIS-IV/WMS-IV standardization data. Intelligence, 51, 79–97. Scholar
  30. Gohm, C. L. (2003). Mood regulation and emotional intelligence: Individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 594–607. Scholar
  31. Goldman, S. L., Kraemer, D. T., & Salovey, P. (1996). Beliefs about mood moderate the relationship of stress to illness and symptom reporting. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 41, 115–128. Scholar
  32. Gutiérrez-Cobo, M. J., Cabello, R., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2017). The three models of emotional intelligence and performance in a hot and cool go/no-go task in undergraduate students. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 33. Scholar
  33. Hodzic, S., Scharfen, J., Ripoll, P., Holling, H., & Zenasni, F. (2018). How efficient are emotional intelligence trainings: A meta-analysis. Emotion Review, 10(2), 138–148. Scholar
  34. Hughes, D. J., & Batey, M. (2017). Using personality questionnaires for selection. In H. Goldstein, E. Pulakos, J. Passmore, & C. Semedo (Eds.), The wiley blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and retention. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Jovanović, V. (2015). A bifactor model of subjective well-being: A re-examination of the structure of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 45–49. Scholar
  36. Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods and Research, 44, 486–507. Scholar
  37. Keyes, C. L. M., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2005). Health as a complete state: The added value in work performance and healthcare costs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47, 523–532. Scholar
  38. Keyes, C. L. M., & Waterman, M. B. (2003). Dimensions of well-being and mental health in adulthood. In M. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, & K. Moore (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development throughout the life course (pp. 477–497). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Koydemir, S., Şimşek, Ö. F., Schütz, A., & Tipandjan, A. (2013). Differences in how trait emotional intelligence predicts life satisfaction: The role of affect balance versus social support in India and Germany. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 51–66. Scholar
  41. Lauriola, M., & Iani, L. (2017). Peronality, positivity and happiness: A mediation analysis using a bifactor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 1659–1682. Scholar
  42. Lench, H. C., Darbor, K. E., & Berg, L. A. (2013). Functional perspectives on emotion, behavior, and cognition. Behavioral Sciences, 3, 1–5. Scholar
  43. Lischetzke, T., Eid, M., & Diener, E. D. (2012). Perceiving one’s own and others’ feelings around the world: The relations of attention to and clarity of feelings with subjective well-being across nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 1249–1267. Scholar
  44. Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. (2000). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 291–317). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Luo, D., Petrill, S. A., & Thompson, L. A. (1994). An exploration of genetic g: Hierarchical factor analysis of cognitive data from the Western Reserve Twin Project. Intelligence, 18(3), 335–347. Scholar
  46. Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being. American Psychologist, 56(3), 239–249. Scholar
  47. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. Scholar
  48. Maul, A. (2012). The validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT) as a measure of emotional intelligence. Emotion Review, 4, 394–402. Scholar
  49. Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. Scholar
  50. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators (pp. 3–31). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  51. Mayer, J. D., & Stevens, A. A. (1994). An emerging understanding of the reflective (meta-) experience of mood. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 351–373. Scholar
  52. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mestre, J. M., MacCann, C., Guil, R., & Roberts, R. D. (2016). Models of cognitive ability and emotion can better inform contemporary emotional intelligence frameworks. Emotion Review, 8(4), 322–330. Scholar
  54. Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of emotional intelligence and work attitudes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90, 177–202. Scholar
  55. Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., Leroy, C., & Roy, E. (2007). Psychometric properties of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, construct, and incremental validity in a French-speaking population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 338–353. Scholar
  56. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  57. Nickerson, C., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (2011). Positive affect and college success. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 717–746. Scholar
  58. Parker, J. D., Creque, R. E., Barnhart, D. L., Harris, J. I., Majeski, S. A., Wood, L. M., et al. (2004). Academic achievement in high school: Does emotional intelligence matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1321–1330. Scholar
  59. Petrides, K. V., Furnham, A., & Mavroveli, S. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence. Moving forward in the field of EI. In G. Matthews (Ed.), Emotional intelligence. Knowns and unknowns (Series in affective science). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. Scholar
  61. Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. Scholar
  62. Roberts, R. D., Schulze, R., & MacCann, C. (2008). The measurement of emotional intelligence: A decade of progress? In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 461–482). New York: SAGE.Google Scholar
  63. Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137–150. Scholar
  64. Rogoza, R., Truong, T. K. H., Różycka-Tran, J., Piotrowski, J., & Żemotel-Piotrowska, M. (2018). Psychometric properties of the MHC-SF: An integration of the existing measurement approaches. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74, 1742–1758. Scholar
  65. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. Scholar
  66. Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the trait meta-mood scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125–154). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Salovey, P., Stroud, L. R., Woolery, A., & Epel, E. S. (2002). Perceived emotional intelligence, stress reactivity, and symptom reports: Further explorations using the trait meta-mood scale. Psychology and Health, 17, 611–627. Scholar
  68. Sánchez-Álvarez, N., Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2015). The relation between emotional intelligence and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 276–285. Scholar
  69. Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of “intelligence” and principles of cognition. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  70. Szczygieł, D., & Mikolajczak, M. (2017). Why are people high in emotional intelligence happier? They make the most of their positive emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 177–181. Scholar
  71. Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003). The affective underpinnings of job perceptions and attitudes: A meta-analytic review and integration. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 914–945. Scholar
  72. Urquijo, I., Extremera, N., & Villa, A. (2016). Emotional intelligence, life satisfaction, and psychological well-being in graduates: The mediating effect of perceived stress. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11, 1241–1252. Scholar
  73. Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. Scholar
  74. Van Praag, B. M., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51, 29–49. Scholar
  75. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale III (3rd ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  76. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134. Scholar
  77. Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., & Michela, J. L. (2003). Savoring versus dampening: Self-esteem differences in regulating positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 566–580. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat de LleidaLleidaSpain
  2. 2.Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations