Advertisement

The Efficacy of Multi-component Positive Psychology Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Tom HendriksEmail author
  • Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra
  • Aabidien Hassankhan
  • Joop de Jong
  • Ernst Bohlmeijer
Review Article

Abstract

Recently, we see a sharp increase in the number of multi-component positive psychology interventions (MPPIs). The aim of the current study is to examine the efficacy of MPPIs, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We included 50 randomized controlled trials that were published in 51 articles between 1998 and August 2018. We found standardized mean differences of Hedges’ g = 0.34 for subjective well-being, Hedges’ g = 0.39 for psychological well-being, indicating small to moderate effects, and Hedges’ g = 0.29 for depression, and Hedges’ g = 0.35 for anxiety and stress, indicating small effects. Removing outliers led to a considerable decrease in effect sizes for subjective well-being and depression, a slight decrease for psychological well-being, and a strong increase in the effect size for stress. Removing low quality studies led to a considerable decrease in the effect sizes for subjective well-being, psychological well-being, and depression, and a slight decrease for anxiety, but a strong increase for stress. Moderator analyses only showed a significant effect for study quality, showing larger effect sizes for low quality studies compared to studies of moderate and high quality. In addition, a larger effect size for anxiety was found in studies from non-Western countries compared to studies from Western countries. In sum, this systematic review and meta-analysis found evidence for the efficacy of MPPIs in improving mental health. We conclude that MPPIs have a small effect on subjective well-being and depression, and a small to moderate effect on psychological well-being. In addition, they may have a small to moderate effect on anxiety and a moderate effect on stress, but definite conclusions of the effects of MPPIs on these outcomes cannot me made due to the limited number of studies. Further well-conducted research among diverse populations is necessary to strengthen claims on the efficacy of MPPIs.

Keywords

Positive psychology Well-being Positive mental health Multicomponent Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

The meta-analyses and data-analyses were conducted by TH, who also wrote the manuscript. The literature search was conducted by TH and MS, the risk of bias analysis was conducted by TH and AH. JdJ was an advisor in the project. EB was the editor of the article. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

*Studies preceded by an asterisk were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis

  1. Adams-Huet, B., & Ahn, C. (2009). Bridging clinical investigators and statisticians. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 57(8), 818–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alden, L. E., & Trew, J. L. (2013). If it makes you happy: Engaging in kind acts increases positive affect in socially anxious individuals. Emotion, 13(1), 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. *Antoine, P., Dauvier, B., Andreotti, E., & Congard, A. (2018). Individual differences in the effects of a positive psychology intervention: Applied psychology. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. *Asgharipoor, N., Farid, A. A., Arshadi, H., & Sahebi, A. (2012). A comparative study on the effectiveness of positive psychotherapy and group cognitive-behavioral therapy for the patients suffering from major depressive disorder. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6(2), 33–41.Google Scholar
  5. *Asl, S. T. S., Sadeghi, K., Bakhtiari, M., Ahmadi, S. M., Anamagh, A. N., & Khayatan, T. (2016). Effect of group positive psychotherapy on improvement of life satisfaction and the quality of life in infertile woman. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 10(1), 105–112.Google Scholar
  6. *Asl, S. T. S., Sadeghi, K., Bakhtiari, M., Khazaie, H., Rezaei, M., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2014). The effectiveness of group positive psychotherapy on improving the depression and increasing the happiness of the infertile women: Clinical trial. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 4(3), 269–275.Google Scholar
  7. *Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Kramer, J., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Walburg, J. A., et al. (2013a). An Internet-based intervention to promote mental fitness for mildly depressed adults: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(9), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2013b). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchanan, K. E., & Bardi, A. (2010). Acts of kindness and acts of novelty affect life satisfaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 235–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S., et al. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. *Cantarella, A., Borella, E., Marigo, C., & De Beni, R. (2017). Benefits of well-being training in healthy older adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 9(3), 261–284.Google Scholar
  12. *Carr, A., & Finnegan, L. (2015). The say ‘yes’ to life (SYTL) program: A positive psychology group intervention for depression. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 45(2), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casellas-Grau, A., Font, A., & Vives, J. (2014). Positive psychology interventions in breast cancer. A systematic review. Psychooncology, 23, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. *Celano, C. M., Beale, E. E., Mastromauro, C. A., Stewart, J. G., Millstein, R. A., Auerbach, R. P., et al. (2017). Psychological interventions to reduce suicidality in high-risk patients with major depression: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 47(5), 810–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. *Cerezo, M. V., Ortiz-Tallo, M., Cardenal, V., & De La Torre-Luque, A. (2014). Positive psychology group intervention for breast cancer patients: A randomised trial. Psychological Reports, 115(1), 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chakhssi, F., Kraiss, J. T., Sommers-Spijkerman, M., & Bohlmeijjer, E. T. (2018). The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being in clinical populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan, A. W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Gøtzsche, P. C., Altman, D. G., Mann, H., Berlin, J. A., et al. (2013). SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: Guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ, 346, e7586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. *Chaves, C., Lopez-Gomez, I., Hervas, G., & Vazquez, C. (2017). A comparative study on the efficacy of a positive psychology intervention and a cognitive behavioral therapy for clinical depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41(3), 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. *Cheung, E. O., Cohn, M. A., Dunn, L. B., Melisko, M. E., Morgan, S., Penedo, F. J., et al. (2017). A randomized pilot trial of a positive affect skill intervention (lessons in linking affect and coping) for women with metastatic breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 26(12), 2101–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. *Cohn, M. A., Pietrucha, M. E., Saslow, L. R., Hult, J. R., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2014). An online positive affect skills intervention reduces depression in adults with type 2 diabetes. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(6), 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cuijpers, P. (2016). Meta-analyses in mental health research. A practical guide. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  22. *Cullen, B., Pownall, J., Cummings, J., Baylan, S., Broomfield, N., Haig, C., et al. (2016). Positive PsychoTherapy in ABI Rehab (PoPsTAR): A pilot randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28(1), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeSteno, D., Li, Y., Dickens, L., & Lerner, J. S. (2015). Gratitude: A tool for reducing economic impatience. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1262–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dickens, L. R. (2017). Using gratitude to promote positive change: A series of meta-analyses investigating the effectiveness of gratitude interventions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diener, E. (2009). The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 37). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Digdon, N., & Koble, A. (2011). Effects of constructive worry, imagery distraction, and gratitude interventions on sleep quality: A pilot trial. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
  27. Donaldson, S. I., Dollwet, M., & Rao, M. A. (2015). Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning revisited: Examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. *Dowlatabadi, M. M., Ahmadi, S. M., Sorbi, M. H., Beiki, O., Razavi, T. K., & Bidaki, R. (2016). The effectiveness of group positive psychotherapy on depression and happiness in breast cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial. Electronic Physician, 8(3), 2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. *Drozd, F., Mork, L., Nielsen, B., Raeder, S., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2014a). Better days—A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based positive psychology intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(5), 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. *Drozd, F., Skeie, L. G., Kraft, P., & Kvale, D. (2014b). A web-based intervention trial for depressive symptoms and subjective well-being in patients with chronic HIV infection. AIDS Care, 26(9), 1080–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. *Dyrbye, L. N., West, C. P., Richards, M. L., Ross, H. J., Satele, D., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2016). A randomized, controlled study of an online intervention to promote job satisfaction and well-being among physicians. Burnout Research, 3(3), 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. *Feicht, T., Wittmann, M., Jose, G., Mock, A., Hirschhausen, E.von, & Esch, T. (2013). Evaluation of a seven-week web-based happiness training to improve psychological well-being, reduce stress, and enhance mindfulness and flourishing: A randomized controlled occupational health study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Article ID 676953.Google Scholar
  35. Froh, J. J. (2004). The history of positive psychology: Truth be told. NYS Psychologist, 16(3), 18–20.Google Scholar
  36. Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. *Gelfin, M., Zohar, A. H., & Lev-Ari, L. (2018). Personality change and therapeutic gain: Randomized controlled trial of a positive psychology intervention. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 18(2), 193–205.Google Scholar
  38. Gosling, S. D., Sandy, C. J., John, O. P., & Potter, J. (2010). Wired but not WEIRD: The promise of the internet in reaching more diverse samples. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 94–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. *Guo, Y.-F., Zhang, X., Plummer, V., Lam, L., Cross, W., & Zhang, J.-P. (2016). Positive psychotherapy for depression and self-efficacy in undergraduate nursing students: A randomized, controlled trial. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 26(4), 375–383.Google Scholar
  40. Hart, K. E., & Sasso, T. (2011). Mapping the contours of contemporary positive psychology. Canadian Psychology, 52(2), 2–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. *Hausmann, L. R., Youk, A., Kwoh, C. K., Ibrahim, S. A., Hannon, M. J., Weiner, D. K., et al. (2017). Testing a positive psychological intervention for osteoarthritis. Pain Medicine, 18(10), 1908–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. *Hendriks, T. (2018). Positive psychology interventions in a multi-ethnic and cross-cultural context. Doctoral dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. http://www.uva.nl/en/profile/h/e/t.hendriks2/t.hendriks2.html.
  43. Hendriks, T., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., Graafsma, T., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & de Jong, J. (2018a). The efficacy of non-Western positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis and systematic review. International Journal of Wellbeing, 8(1), 71–98.Google Scholar
  44. Hendriks, T., Warren, M. A., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., Graafsma, T., Bohlmeijer, E. T., et al. (2018b). How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., et al. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ, 343, d5928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Vol. 4). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Higgins, J., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. *Huffman, J. C., Mastromauro, C. A., Boehm, J. K., Seabrook, R., Fricchione, G. L., Denninger, J. W., et al. (2011). Development of a positive psychology intervention for patients with acute cardiovascular disease. Heart International, 6(e13), 47–54.Google Scholar
  49. *Hwang, K., Kwon, A., & Hong, C. (2016). A preliminary study of new positive psychology interventions: Neurofeedback-aided meditation therapy and modified positive psychotherapy. Current Psychology, 36(3), 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Isik, S., & Erguner-Tekinalp, B. (2017). The effects of gratitude journaling on Turkish first year college students’ college adjustment, life satisfaction and positive affect. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 39(2), 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. *Ivtzan, I., Young, T., Martman, J., Jeffrey, A., Lomas, T., Hart, R., & Eiroa-Orosa, F. J. (2016). Integrating mindfulness into positive psychology: A randomised controlled trial of an online positive mindfulness program. Mindfulness, 7(6), 1396–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. *Ivtzan, I., Young, T., Lee, H. C., Lomas, T., Daukantaitė, D., & Kjell, O. N. (2018). Mindfulness based flourishing program: A cross-cultural study of Hong Kong Chinese and British participants. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(8), 2205–2223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. *Joutsenniemi, K., Kaattari, C., Härkänen, T., Pankakoski, M., Langinvainio, H., Lönnqvist, J., et al. (2014). E-mail-based exercises in happiness, physical activity and readings: A randomized trial on 3274 Finns. Journal of Psychiatry, 17(6), 1000140.Google Scholar
  54. *Kahler, C. W., Spillane, N. S., Day, A. M., Cioe, P. A., Parks, A., Leventhal, A. M., et al. (2015). Positive psychotherapy for smoking cessation: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17, 1385–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. *Khayatan, T., Azkhosh, M., Bahmani, B., Azimian, M., & Dolatshahi, B. (2014). Group positive psychotherapy and depression of females affected by multiple sclerosis. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal, 12(22), 49–53.Google Scholar
  56. Kim, H., Doiron, K. M., Warren, M. A., & Donaldson, S. I. (2018). The international landscape of positive psychology research: A systematic review. International Journal of Wellbeing, 8(1), 50–70.Google Scholar
  57. *Koydemir, S., & Sun-Selisik, Z. (2016). Well-being on campus: Testing the effectiveness of an online strengths-based intervention for first year college students. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 44(4), 434–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lau, R. W., & Cheng, S. T. (2011). Gratitude lessens death anxiety. European Journal of Ageing, 8(3), 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Applied positive psychology: A new perspective for professional practice. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practise (pp. 3–14). New Jersey: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Linley, P. A., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., & Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. *Lü, W., Whang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2013). A pilot study on changes of cardiac vagal tone in individuals with low trait positive affect: The effect of positive psychotherapy. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. *Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Peterson, S. J. (2010). The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. *Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Patera, J. L. (2008). Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Macaskill, A. (2016). Review of positive psychology applications in clinical medical populations. Healthcare, 4, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. *Mohammadi, N., Aghayousefi, A., Nikrahan, G. R., Adams, C. N., Alipour, A., Sadeghi, M., et al. (2018). A randomized trial of an optimism training intervention in patients with heart disease. General Hospital Psychiatry, 51, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Teztlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). The PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 51, 1–7.Google Scholar
  68. Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., et al. (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ, 340, c869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. *Moskowitz, J. T., Carrico, A. W., Duncan, L. G., Cohn, M. A., Cheung, E. O., Batchelder, A., et al. (2017). Randomized controlled trial of a positive affect intervention for people newly diagnosed with HIV. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(5), 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. *Müller, R., Gertz, K. J., Molton, I. R., Terrill, A. L., Bombardier, C. H., Ehde, D. M., et al. (2016). Effects of a tailored positive psychology intervention on well-being and pain in individuals with chronic pain and a physical disability: A feasibility trial. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 32(1), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. *Myers, N. D., Prilleltensky, I., Prilleltensky, O., McMahon, A., Dietz, S., & Rubenstein, C. L. (2017). Efficacy of the fun for wellness online intervention to promote multidimensional well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 18(8), 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Myers, N. D., Dietz, S., Prilleltensky, I., Prilleltensky, O., McMahon, A., Rubenstein, C. L., & Lee, S. (2018). Efficacy of the fun for wellness online intervention to promote well-being actions: A secondary data analysis. Games for Health Journal, 7(4), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. *Neumeier, L. M., Brook, L., Ditchburn, G., & Sckopke, P. (2017). Delivering your daily dose of well-being to the workplace: A randomized controlled trial of an online well-being programme for employees. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. *Nikrahan, G. R., Laferton, J. A., Asgari, K., Kalantari, M., Abedi, M. R., Etesampour, A., et al. (2016). Effects of positive psychology interventions on risk biomarkers in coronary patients: A randomized, wait-list controlled pilot trial. Psychosomatics: Journal of Consultation and Liaison Psychiatry, 57(4), 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. O’Connell, B. H., O’Shea, D., & Gallagher, S. (2016). Enhancing social relationships through positive psychology activities: A randomised controlled trial. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Orwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8(2), 157–159.Google Scholar
  77. *Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The working for wellness program: RCT of an employee well-being intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 1007–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Parks, A. C., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2013). Positive interventions: Past, present and future. In T. B. Kashdan & J. V. Ciarrochi (Eds.), Mindfulness, acceptance, and positive psychology: The seven foundations of well-being. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
  79. *Peters, M. L., Smeets, E., Feijge, M., van Breukelen, G., Andersson, G., Buhrman, M., et al. (2017). Happy despite pain: A randomized controlled trial of an 8-week internet-delivered positive psychology intervention for enhancing well-being in patients with chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 33, 962–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2015). Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths-vs a lesser strengths-intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. *Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2016). Addressing the role of personality, ability, and positive and negative affect in positive psychology interventions: Findings from a randomized intervention based on the Authentic Happiness Theory and extensions. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(6), 609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rashid, T. (2015). Positive psychotherapy: A strength-based approach. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. *Roepke, A. M., Jaffeem, S. R., Riffle, O. M., McGonigal, J., Broome, R., & Maxwell, B. (2015). Randomized controlled trial of SuperBetter, a smartphone-based/internet-based self-help tool to reduce depressive symptoms. Games for Health Journal: Research, Development, and Clinical Applications, 4(3), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. *Rogerson, S., Meir, R., Crowley-McHattan, Z., McEwen, K., & Pastoors, R. (2016). A randomized controlled pilot trial investigating the impact of a workplace resilience program during a time of significant organizational change. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58(4), 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rosenberg, M. S. (2005). The file-drawer problem revisited: A general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59(2), 464–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rusk, R. D., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Waters, L. (2018). A complex dynamic systems approach to lasting positive change: The synergistic change model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rusk, R. D., & Waters, L. E. (2013). Tracing the size, reach, impact, and breadth of positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. *Sanjuan, P., Montalbetti, T., Perez-Garcia, A. M., Bermudez, J., Arranz, H., & Castro, A. (2016). A randomised trial of a positive intervention to promote well-being in cardiac patients. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 8(1), 64–84.Google Scholar
  89. *Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Drossaert, C. H., Pieterse, M. E., Boon, B., Walburg, J. A., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2017). An early intervention to promote well-being and flourishing and reduce anxiety and depression: A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interventions, 9, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. *Schueller, M. S., & Parks, A. C. (2012). Disseminating self-help: Positive psychology exercises in an online trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, e63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schueller, S. M., & Parks, A. C. (2014). The science of self-help. European Psychologist, 19(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. *Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61(8), 774–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2001). Goals, congruence, and positive well-being: New empirical support for humanistic theories. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(1), 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56(3), 216–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Slavin, R., & Smith, D. (2009). The relationship between sample sizes and effect sizes in systematic reviews in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 500–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sterne, J. A., Egger, M., & Moher, D. (2008). Addressing reporting biases. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series (pp. 297–333).Google Scholar
  101. Sutipan, P., Intarakamhang, U., & Macaskill, A. (2016). The impact of positive psychological interventions on well-being in healthy elderly people. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25, 1–23.Google Scholar
  102. Toback, R. L., Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Patel, P. D. (2016). Outcomes of a character strengths–based intervention on self-esteem and self-efficacy of psychiatrically hospitalized Youths. Psychiatric Service, 67, 574–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. *Uliaszek, A. A., Rashid, T., Williams, G. E., & Gulamani, T. (2016). Group therapy for university students: A randomized control trial of dialectical behavior therapy and positive psychotherapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 77, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Walsh, S., Cassidy, M., & Priebe, S. (2017). The application of positive psychotherapy in mental health care: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 638–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Weiss, L. A., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2016). Can we increase psychological well-being? The effects of interventions on psychological well-being: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0158092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Woodworth, R. J., O’Brien-Malone, A., Diamond, M. R., & Schuz, B. (2016). Happy days: Positive psychology interventions effects on affect in an N-of-1 trial. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(1), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yelland, L. N., Sullivan, T. R., Voysey, M., Lee, K. J., Cook, J. A., & Forbes, A. B. (2015). Applying the intention-to-treat principle in practice: Guidance on handling randomisation errors. Clinical Trials, 12(4), 418–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zhang, Z., Xu, X., & Ni, H. (2013). Small studies may overestimate the effect sizes in critical care meta-analyses: A meta-epidemiological study. Critical Care, 17(1), R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social SciencesAnton de Kom Universiteit van SurinameParamariboSuriname
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Health, and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Well-being ResearchUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations