Advertisement

A Dynamic Model on Happiness and Exogenous Wealth Shock: The Case of Lottery Winners

  • Arie Sherman
  • Tal ShavitEmail author
  • Guy Barokas
Research Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

The sudden acquisition of a large sum of money, known as “wealth shock,” can have unanticipated negative consequences, and actually cause greater unhappiness in its so-called beneficiaries. There is extensive economic literature describing these negative consequences on a macro-economic level, but there is no coherent theoretical model that describes the various consequences of wealth shock on a micro-economic level. To explain both the short- and long-term effects of an exogenous monetary shock (for example, winning a lottery) on individual happiness, this paper offers a novel dynamic equilibrium model of human happiness. A dynamic equilibrium model is best suited for this purpose, because happiness is a dynamic process. The proposed model captures both short- and long-term effects, and describes an equilibrium in which a person’s experienced utility and happiness is improved after the sudden wealth shock, and why at the saddle point, life can become sadder and more miserable. The conditions detrimental to winners’ happiness include reducing the amount of time and effort they allocate to preserving their stock of hedonic capital.

Keywords

Wealth shock Dynamic model Hedonic capital Decision utility Experience utility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the research authority at the School of Business Administration in the Academic College of Management Academic Studies (Israel) for financial support.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2008). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Apouey, B., & Clark, A. E. (2014). Winning big but feeling no better? The effect of lottery prizes on physical and mental health. Health Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3035.Google Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Arvey, R. D., Harpaz, I., & Liao, H. (2004). Work centrality and post-award work behavior of lottery winners. The Journal of Psychology, 138(5), 404–420.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917.Google Scholar
  7. Cesarini, D., Lindqvist, E., Notowidigdo, M. J., & Östling, R. (2015). The effect of wealth on individual and household labor supply: Evidence from Swedish lotteries (No. w21762). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  8. Cesarini, D., Lindqvist, E., Östling, R., & Wallace, B. (2016). Wealth, health, and child development: Evidence from administrative data on Swedish lottery players. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(2), 687–738.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.Google Scholar
  10. Corden, W. M. (1984). Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: Survey and consolidation. Oxford Economic Papers, 36(3), 359–380.Google Scholar
  11. Corden, W. M., & Neary, J. P. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialization in a small open economy. The Economic Journal, 92(December), 825–848.Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins. (e-book).Google Scholar
  13. Daily Mail. (2013). “The drama is nonstop:” $4 million Powerball winner “Wild” Willie Steely wants his old life back. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2431868/Powerball-jackpot-winner-Wild-Willie-Steely-wants-old-life-back.html#ixzz4gZ0jjvgg.
  14. Debreu, G. (1959). Topological methods in cardinal utility theory (no. 76). Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.‏Google Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Doll, J. A. (2012). Treasury of terribly sad stories of lotto winners. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/03/terribly-sad-true-stories-lotto-winners/329903/.
  17. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.Google Scholar
  18. Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Building a better theory of well-being. IZA discussion paper no. 742.Google Scholar
  19. Eckblad, G. F., & von der Lippe, A. L. (1994). Norwegian lottery winners: Cautious realists. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10(4), 305–322.Google Scholar
  20. Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.Google Scholar
  22. Frey, B. S., Benesch, C., & Stutzer, A. (2007). Does watching TV make us happy? Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(3), 283–313.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2014). Economic consequences of mispredicting utility. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(4), 937–956.Google Scholar
  25. Gardner, J., & Oswald, A. J. (2007). Money and mental wellbeing: A longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins. Journal of Health Economics, 26(1), 49–60.Google Scholar
  26. Goncharov, I. (1859) Oblomov. Translated by D. Magarshack (1954). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  27. Graham, L., & Oswald, A. J. (2010). Hedonic capital, adaptation and resilience. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(2), 372–384.Google Scholar
  28. Grün, C., Hauser, W., & Rhein, T. (2010). Is any job better than no job? Life satisfaction and re-employment. Journal of Labor Research, 32, 285–306.Google Scholar
  29. Hankins, S., Hoekstra, M., & Skiba, P. M. (2011). The ticket to easy street? The financial consequences of winning the lottery. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 961–969.Google Scholar
  30. Henley, A. (2004). House price shocks, windfall gains and hours of work: British evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(4), 439–456.Google Scholar
  31. Hsee, C. K., Rottenstreich, Y., & Stutzer, A. (2012). Suboptimal choices and the need for experienced individual well-being in economic analysis. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(1), 63–85.Google Scholar
  32. Imbens, G. W., Rubin, D. B., & Sacerdote, B. (2001). Estimating the effects of unearned income on labor supply, earnings, savings, and consumption: Evidence from a survey of lottery players. American Economic Review, 91(4), 778–794.Google Scholar
  33. Jahoda, M. (1981). Work, employment and unemployment: Values, theories and approaches in social research. American Psychologist, 36, 184–191.Google Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Anomalies: Utility maximization and experienced utility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 221–234.Google Scholar
  35. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–406.Google Scholar
  36. Kaplan, H. R. (1987). Lottery winners: The myth and reality. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 3(3), 168–178.Google Scholar
  37. Kroll, C., & Pokutta, S. (2013). Just a perfect day? Developing a happiness optimised day schedule. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 210–217.Google Scholar
  38. Kuhn, P., Kooreman, P., Soetevent, A., & Kapteyn, A. (2011). The effects of lottery prizes on winners and their neighbors: Evidence from Dutch Postcode Lottery. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2226–2247.Google Scholar
  39. Kushnirovich, N., & Sherman, A. (2017). Dimensions of life satisfaction: Immigrant and ethnic minorities. International Migration.  https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12329.Google Scholar
  40. Lane, R. E. (1992). Work as “disutility” and money as “happiness:” Cultural origins of a basic market error. Journal of Socio-Economics, 21(1), 43–64.Google Scholar
  41. Lau, C., & Kramer, L. (2005). Die Relativitätstheorie des Glücks: über das Leben von Lottomillionären [The relativity of happiness: On the life of Lotto millionaires] (Vol. 24). Herbolzheim: Centaurus.Google Scholar
  42. Layard, R. (2004). Good jobs and bad jobs. CEP occasional paper no. 19.Google Scholar
  43. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  44. Layous, K., Lee, H., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Culture matters when designing a successful happiness-increasing activity: A comparison of the United States and South Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(8), 1294–1303.Google Scholar
  45. Lindahl, M. (2005). Estimating the effect of income on health and mortality using lottery prizes as an exogenous source of variation in income. Journal of Human Resources, 40(1), 144–168.Google Scholar
  46. Lutter, M. (2007). Book Review: Winning a lottery brings no happiness! Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 155–160.Google Scholar
  47. Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.Google Scholar
  48. Lyubomirsky, S., Dickerhoof, R., Boehm, J. K., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: An experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being. Emotion, 11(2), 391–402.Google Scholar
  49. Mitchell, M. E., Lebow, J. R., Uribe, R., Grathouse, H., & Shoger, W. (2011). Internet use, happiness, social support and introversion: A more fine grained analysis of person variables and internet activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1857–1861.Google Scholar
  50. Powdthavee, N., & Oswald, A. J. (2014). Does money make people rightwing and inegalitarian? A longitudinal study of lottery winners. IZA discussion paper no. 7934.Google Scholar
  51. Samuelson, P. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155–161.Google Scholar
  52. Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy: An inquiry into human satisfaction and consumer dissatisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–425.Google Scholar
  55. Sherman, A., & Shavit, T. (2009). Welfare to work and work to welfare: The effect of the reference point: A theoretical and experimental study. Economics Letters, 105(3), 290–292.Google Scholar
  56. Sherman, A., & Shavit, T. (2012). How the lifecycle hypothesis explains volunteering during retirement. Ageing and Society, 32(08), 1360–1381.Google Scholar
  57. Sherman, A., & Shavit, T. (2013). The immaterial sustenance of work and leisure: A new look at the work-leisure model. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 46, 10–16.Google Scholar
  58. Sherman, A., & Shavit, T. (2017). The thrill of creative effort at work: An empirical study on work, creative effort and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9910-x.Google Scholar
  59. Skidelsky, R., & Skidelsky, E. (2012). How much is enough? Money and the good life. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  60. Spencer, D. A. (2009). The political economy of work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Sprott, J. C. (2005). Dynamical models of happiness. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 9(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
  62. Stepanikova, I., Nie, N. H., & He, X. (2010). Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: Evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 329–338.Google Scholar
  63. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2010). Recent advances in the economics of individual subjective well-being. Social Research, 77(2), 679–714.Google Scholar
  64. Sullivan, E. (2008). For Alex Toth, Lotto win was followed by trouble. Tampa Bay Times. http://www.tampabay. com/news/obituaries/for-alex-toth-lotto-win-was-followed-by-trouble/472080.
  65. Ugel, E. (2007). Money for nothing: One man’s journey through the dark side of lottery millions. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  66. van Praag, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2002). Life satisfaction differences between workers and non-workers: The value of participation per se (no. 02-018/3). Tinbergen Institute discussion paper.Google Scholar
  67. Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate microeconomics (8th ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  68. Winkelmann, R., Oswald, A. J., & Powdthavee, N. (2011). What happens to people after winning the lottery. In Proceedings of European economic association & econometric society parallel meetings (pp. 25–29).Google Scholar
  69. Zoroya, G. (2004). One wild ride for jackpot winner. USA Today. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-02-12-lottery-winner_x.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsRuppin Academic CenterEmek HeferIsrael
  2. 2.School of Business AdministrationCollege of Management Academic StudiesRishon-LeZionIsrael

Personalised recommendations