Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 1259–1279 | Cite as

The Roots of Virtue: A Cross-Cultural Lexical Analysis

  • Tim LomasEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Although the notion of virtue is increasingly prominent in psychology, the way it has been studied and conceptualised has been relatively Western-centric, and does not fully account for variations in how it has been understood cross-culturally. As such, an enquiry was conducted into ideas relating to virtue found across the world’s cultures, focusing specifically on so-called untranslatable words. Through a quasi-systematic search of academic and grey literature, together with conceptual snowballing and crowd-sourced suggestions, over 200 relevant terms were located. An adapted grounded theory analysis identified five themes which together provide an insight into the “roots” of virtue (i.e., the main sources from which it appears to spring): virtue itself (the concept of it); considerateness (caring about it); wisdom (knowing what it consists of); agency (managing to be/do it); and skill (mastery of the preceding elements). The results help shed further light on the potential dynamics of this important phenomenon.

Keywords

Virtue Wellbeing Cross-cultural Language Character strengths 

References

  1. Allinson, R. E. (2003). Hillel and Confucius: The prescriptive formulation of the golden rule in the Jewish and Chinese Confucian ethical traditions. Dao, 3(1), 29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910339.Google Scholar
  2. Azañedo, C. M., Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Barraca, J. (2014). Character strengths in Spain: Validation of the values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in a Spanish sample. Clínica y Salud, 25(2), 123–130.Google Scholar
  3. Baer, B. J., & Olshanskaya, N. (2014). Russian writers on translation: An anthology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., & Juola Exline, J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1165–1194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00086.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, D., & Marecek, J. (2008). Dreaming the American dream: Individualism and positive psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1767–1780.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00139.x.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2011). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blumberg, S. H. (2006). To know before whom you stand: A philosophy for a spiritual and moral liberal Jewish education for the 21st century. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson, & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, Moral and spiritual dimensions in education (pp. 717–729). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Blumenthal, A. L. (1975). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30(11), 1081–1088.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.30.11.1081.Google Scholar
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Google Scholar
  10. Brdar, I., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 151–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001.Google Scholar
  11. Buddharakkhita, A. (2008). The Dhammapada: The Buddha’s path of wisdom. London: Buddhist Publication Society.Google Scholar
  12. Carter, J. R. (2005). Buddhist ethics? In W. Schweiker (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to religious ethics (pp. 278–285). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Curren, R. (2008). Cardinal virtues of academic administration. Theory and Research in Education, 6, 337–363.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878508095588.Google Scholar
  14. Cutcliffe, J. R. (2005). Adapt or adopt: Developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51(4), 421–428.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03514.x.Google Scholar
  15. Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 203–213.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.203.Google Scholar
  16. Danziger, K. (2006). Universalism and indigenization in the history of modern psychology. In A. C. Brock (Ed.), Internationalizing the history of psychology (pp. 208–225). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. De Raad, B., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2011). A psycholexical study of virtues in the Dutch language, and relations between virtues and personality. European Journal of Personality, 25(1), 43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.777.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrenfels, C. V. (1890/1988). On gestalt qualities (B. Smith, Trans.). Munich: Philosphia.Google Scholar
  19. Fermor, S. (1998). Poetry in motion: Beauty in movement and the renaissance conception of ‘leggiadria’. In Concepts of Beauty in Renaissance Art (pp. 127–133). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Finlay, F., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  21. Fischer, A. (2015). Wisdom-the answer to all the question really worth asking. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(9), 73–83.Google Scholar
  22. Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B. H., & Riches, A. (2011). The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 149–163.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023780.Google Scholar
  23. Gander, F., Proyer, R., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2012). The good character at work: An initial study on the contribution of character strengths in identifying healthy and unhealthy work-related behavior and experience patterns. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 85(8), 895–904.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0736-x.Google Scholar
  24. Garfield, J. L. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nâgârjuna’s Mûlamadhyamakakârikâ. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate moral intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (pp. 367–391). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Harrow, S., & Unwin, T. A. (2009). Introduction. In S. Harrow & T. A. Unwin (Eds.), Joie de Vivre in french literature and culture: Essays in honour of Michael Freeman (pp. 17–33). Paris: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  27. Haspelmath, M. (2009). Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. In M. Haspelmath & U. Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook (pp. 35–55). Berlin: De Gruyter Martin.Google Scholar
  28. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29.  https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a.Google Scholar
  29. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4.Google Scholar
  30. Ivtzan, I., Lomas, T. (Eds.). (2016). Mindfulness in Positive Psychology: The Science of Meditation and Wellbeing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Johansson, M., & Nordrum, L. (2016). Swedish hinna viewed through its English correspondences–have time or be able to? Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(3), 171–199.Google Scholar
  32. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.  https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016.Google Scholar
  33. Kang, C. (2009). Buddhist and Tantric perspectives on causality and society. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 16, 69–103.Google Scholar
  34. Kinneavy, J. L. (2002). Kairos in classical and modern rhetorical theory. In P. Sipiora & J. S. Baumlin (Eds.), Rhetoric and kairos: Essays in history, theory, and praxis (pp. 58–76). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lehrer, A. (1974). Semantic fields and lexical structures. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  36. Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2012). Character strengths in Israel: Hebrew adaptation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 41–50.Google Scholar
  37. Lomas, T. (2015a). Positive cross-cultural psychology: Exploring similarity and difference in constructions and experiences of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4), 60–77.  https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i4.3.Google Scholar
  38. Lomas, T. (2015b). Self-transcendence through shared suffering: A transpersonal theory of compassion. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 27(2), 168–187.Google Scholar
  39. Lomas, T. (2016). Towards a positive cross-cultural lexicography: Enriching our emotional landscape through 216 ‘untranslatable’ words pertaining to wellbeing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 546–558.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1127993.Google Scholar
  40. Lomas, T. (2017a). Recontextualising mindfulness: Theravada Buddhist perspectives on the ethical and spiritual dimensions of awareness. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(2), 209–219.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000080.Google Scholar
  41. Lomas, T. (2017b). The spectrum of positive affect: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(3), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i3.608.Google Scholar
  42. Lomas, T. (2018a). Experiential cartography, and the significance of untranslatable words. Theory & Psychology https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318772914.Google Scholar
  43. Lomas, T. (2018b). The dynamics of spirituality: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000163.Google Scholar
  44. Lomas, T. (2018c). The flavours of love: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(1), 134–152.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12158.Google Scholar
  45. Lomas, T. (2018d). The value of ambivalent emotions: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1400143.Google Scholar
  46. Lomas, T., Cartwright, T., Edginton, T., Ridge, D. (2014). A religion of wellbeing? The appeal of Buddhism to men in London, United Kingdom. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(3), 198–207.Google Scholar
  47. Lomas, T., Etcoff, N., Gordon, W. V., & Shonin, E. (2017). Zen and the art of living mindfully: The health-enhancing potential of Zen aesthetics. Journal of Religion and Health.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0446-5.Google Scholar
  48. Lucas, K., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2004). Blue-collar work, career, and success: Occupational narratives of Sisu. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(4), 273–292.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000240167.Google Scholar
  49. Lucy, J. A. (1996). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lynch, J. P., & Miles, G. B. (1980). In search of Thumos: Toward an understanding of a greek psychological term. Prudentia, 12(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
  51. Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in action scale and the big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 787–799.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003.Google Scholar
  52. Makkreel, R. A. (1992). Dilthey: Philosopher of the human studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. McGrath, R. E. (2014). Scale-and item-level factor analyses of the VIA inventory of strengths. Assessment, 21(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
  54. McGrath, R. E. (2015a). Character strengths in 75 nations: An update. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 41–52.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.888580.Google Scholar
  55. McGrath, R. E. (2015b). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407–424.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994222.Google Scholar
  56. McGrath, R. E., Greenberg, M. J., & Hall-Simmonds, A. (2017). Scarecrow, Tin Woodsman, and Cowardly Lion: The three-factor model of virtue. The Journal of Positive Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1326518.Google Scholar
  57. Nassar, H. (2011). Darwish and the need for a new poetry of resistance for the Arab Spring. Near East Quarterly, 4, 1–7.Google Scholar
  58. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). The values in action inventory of character strengths for youth. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? (pp. 13–23). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Perls, F. (1969). Gestalt therapy verbatim. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  60. Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2009). Classifying and measuring strengths of character. In S. J. Lopez & G. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 25–33). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Peterson, C., Park, N., Pole, N., D’Andrea, W., & Seligman, M. E. (2008). Strengths of character and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21(2), 214–217.Google Scholar
  63. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  64. Pettigrove, G. (2017). Alternatives to Neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics. In N. E. Snow (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of virtue (pp. 359–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Plato. (380 BCE/2000). The republic (T. Griffith, Trans. G. R. F. Ferrari Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Proctor, C., Tsukayama, E., Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Eades, J. F., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths gym: The impact of a character strengths-based intervention on the life satisfaction and well-being of adolescents. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(5), 377–388.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.594079.Google Scholar
  67. Pye, M. (2004). Skilful means: A concept in Mahayana Buddhism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2015). Mapping strengths into virtues: The relation of the 24 VIA-strengths to six ubiquitous virtues. Frontiers in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00460.Google Scholar
  69. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2010). Values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31(3), 138–149.Google Scholar
  70. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.Google Scholar
  71. Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5(4), 207–214.  https://doi.org/10.2307/409588.Google Scholar
  72. Saraydar, S. C. (1990). No longer shall you kill: Peace, power and the Iroquois great law. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 15(1), 20–28.  https://doi.org/10.1525/ahu.1990.15.1.20.Google Scholar
  73. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.Google Scholar
  74. Sercu, L. (2002). Autonomous learning and the acquisition of intercultural communicative competence: Some implications for course development. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 61–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310208666633.Google Scholar
  75. Shryack, J., Steger, M. F., Krueger, R. F., & Kallie, C. S. (2010). The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 714–719.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.007.Google Scholar
  76. Singh, K., & Choubisa, R. (2010). Empirical validation of values in action-inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in Indian context. Psychological Studies, 55(2), 151–158.Google Scholar
  77. Snow, N. E. (2017). The Oxford handbook of virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  79. Tadmor, U. (2009). Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In M. Haspelmath & U. Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook (pp. 55–75). Berlin: De Gruyter Martin.Google Scholar
  80. Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Telfer, E. (1989). The unity of the moral virtues in Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 90, 35–48.Google Scholar
  82. Vallerand, R. J. (2012). The role of passion in sustainable psychological well-being. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 2(1), 1.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2211-1522-2-1.Google Scholar
  83. Whorf, B. L. (1940). Science and linguistics. Technology Review, 42(6), 229–231.Google Scholar
  84. Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Wolvekamp, H. P. (1966). The concept of the organism as an integrated Whole. Dialectica, 20(2), 196–214.Google Scholar
  87. Yamamoto-Mitani, N., & Wallhagen, M. (2002). Pursuit of psychological well-being (Ikigai) and the evolution of self-understanding in the context of caregiving in Japan. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 26(4), 399–417.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021747419204.Google Scholar
  88. Yoneoka, J. (2000). What is a kokusaijin? A 10 year study. The Language Teacher, 24(9), 7–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of East LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations