Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 955–970 | Cite as

Intergenerational Transmission of Latent Satisfaction Reflected by Satisfaction Across Multiple Life Domains: A Prospective 32-year Follow-Up Study

  • Henrik Dobewall
  • Mirka HintsanenEmail author
  • Kateryna Savelieva
  • Christian Hakulinen
  • Päivi Merjonen
  • Kia Gluschkoff
  • Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
Research Paper


Intergenerational transmission of life satisfaction has been empirically established, but less is known about the continuity of satisfaction as being reflected across multiple life domains, unique effects of parental domain-specific satisfaction on offspring overall life satisfaction, and potential gender effects. In this population-based prospective study, the association between the life satisfaction of parents (G1) (2191 mothers and 2156 fathers) and their children (G2) (921 sons and 1277 daughters) was examined. In both generations, satisfaction as a parent, as a spouse, and at work was assessed in about the same developmental stage (mean age for G1 38–42 years, and for G2 38–43 years at the times when LS was measured). When both parents were considered jointly, only mothers’ overall life satisfaction had an independent effect on their adult children’s overall life satisfaction, with the effect diminishing over time. However, we also found a robust effect of paternal satisfaction at work on offspring’s overall life satisfaction in adulthood. Gender of the offspring did not significantly moderate the strength of the associations between generations. The current findings emphasize the high interdependence of life satisfaction within families long after children have moved out of the parental home.


Intergenerational transmission Life satisfaction Multiple life domains Gender effects Young Finns study 



The current study has been financially supported by the Academy of Finland Grants 258578 (M. H.) and 265869 (Mind).

Supplementary material

10902_2018_9975_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 32 kb)


  1. Adamsons, K., & Palkovitz, R. (2014). Theorizing about fathering: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(4), 279–281. Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. In Keynote presentation at the SAS Global Forum. Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Scholar
  4. Bartels, M. (2015). Genetics of happiness, satisfaction with life, and wellbeing: A review and meta-analysis of heritability studies. Behavior Genetics, 45(2), 137–156. Scholar
  5. Beller, E. (2009). Bringing intergenerational social mobility research into the twenty-first century: Why mothers matter. American Sociological Review, 74, 507–528. Scholar
  6. Belsky, J., Conger, R., & Capaldi, D. M. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of parenting: Introduction to the special section. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1201–1204. Scholar
  7. Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., Bohlmeijer, E., et al. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 119. Scholar
  8. Bookwala, J., & Schulz, R. (1996). Spousal similarity in subjective well-being: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Psychology and Aging, 11(4), 582–590. Scholar
  9. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent–child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Bretherton, I. (2010). Fathers in attachment theory and research: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 180(1–2), 9–23. Scholar
  11. Carlsson, F., Lampi, E., Li, W., & Martinsson, P. (2014). Subjective well-being among preadolescents and their parents: Evidence of intergenerational transmission of well-being from urban China. Journal of Socio-Economics, 48, 11–18. Scholar
  12. Casas, F., Coenders, G., Cummins, R. A., González, M., Figuer, C., & Malo, S. (2008). Does subjective well-being show a relationship between parents and their children? Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 197–205. Scholar
  13. Clair, A. (2012). The relationship between parent’s subjective well-being and the life satisfaction of their children in Britain. Child Indicators Research, 5(4), 631–650. Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. Scholar
  17. Erola, J., Jalonen, S., & Lehti, H. (2016). Parental education, class and income over early life course and children’s achievement. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44, 33–43. Scholar
  18. Falissard, B. (2005). The psy package: Various procedures used in psychometry. R package available on CRAN.Google Scholar
  19. Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19. Scholar
  20. Haataja, A. (2009). In Fathers’ use of paternity and parental leave in the Nordic countries (No. 2/2009). Online working paper.Google Scholar
  21. Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2014). Parents transmit happiness along with associated values and behaviors to their children: A lifelong happiness dividend? Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 909–933. Scholar
  22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. Scholar
  23. Jarnecke, A. M., & South, S. C. (2013). Attachment orientations as mediators in the intergenerational transmission of marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(4), 550–559. Scholar
  24. Josefsson, K., Jokela, M., Cloninger, C. R., Hintsanen, M., Salo, J., Hintsa, T., et al. (2013). Maturity and change in personality: Developmental trends of temperament and character in adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 25(3), 713–727. Scholar
  25. Katainen, S., Räikkönen, K., Keskivaara, P., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (1999). Maternal child-rearing attitudes and role satisfaction and children’s temperament as antecedents of adolescent depressive tendencies: Follow-up study of 6- to 15-Year-Olds. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(2), 139–163. Scholar
  26. Korupp, S. E., Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Van Der Lippe, T. (2002). Do mothers matter? A comparison of models of the influence of mothers’ and fathers’ educational and occupational status on children’s educational attainment. Quality & Quantity, 36(1), 17–42. Scholar
  27. Lamb, M. E. (1977a). Father-infant and mother-infant interaction in the first year of life. Child Development, 48(1), 167–181. Scholar
  28. Lamb, M. E. (1977b). The development of mother-infant and father-infant attachments in the second year of life. Developmental Psychology, 13(6), 637–648. Scholar
  29. Lance, C. E., Lautenschlager, G. J., Sloan, C. E., & Varca, P. E. (1989). A comparison between bottom–up, top–down, and bidirectional models of relationships between global and life facet satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 601–624. Scholar
  30. Larson, R. W., & Almeida, D. M. (1999). Emotional transmission in the daily lives of families: A new paradigm for studying family process. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 5–20. Scholar
  31. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. Scholar
  32. Ma, K. R. (2016). Intergenerational transmission of wealth and life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(4), 1287–1308. Scholar
  33. Martín-María, N., Miret, M., Caballero, F. F., Rico-Uribe, L. A., Steptoe, A., Chatterji, S., et al. (2016). The impact of subjective well-being on mortality. Psychosomatic Medicine. Scholar
  34. Nes, R. B., Czajkowski, N., & Tambs, K. (2010). Family matters: Happiness in nuclear families and twins. Behavior Genetics, 40(5), 577–590. Scholar
  35. Overton, W. F. (1973). On the assumptive base of the nature-nurture controversy: Additive versus interactive conceptions. Human Development, 16, 74–89. Scholar
  36. Park, H., Suh, B. S., Kim, W. S., Lee, H.-K., Park, S.-C., & Lee, K. (2015). Character profiles and life satisfaction. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 58, 172–177. Scholar
  37. Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Schoemann, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2013). Sem tools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package available on CRAN.Google Scholar
  38. Raitakari, O. T., Juonala, M., Rönnemaa, T., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., Räsänen, L., Pietikäinen, M., et al. (2008). Cohort profile: The cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 37(6), 1220–1226. Scholar
  39. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. Scholar
  40. Rissanen, T., Viinamäki, H., Honkalampi, K., Lehto, S. M., Hintikka, J., Saharinen, T., et al. (2011). Long term life dissatisfaction and subsequent major depressive disorder and poor mental health. BMC Psychiatry, 11(1), 140. Scholar
  41. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Säkkinen, S., & Kuoppala, T. (2016). Varhaiskasvatus 2015 Tilastoraportti (No. 21). Helsinki.Google Scholar
  43. Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Environmental influences on well-being: A dyadic latent panel analysis of spousal similarity. Social Indicators Research, 98(1), 1–21. Scholar
  44. Schwarze, J., & Winkelmann, R. (2011). Happiness and altruism within the extended family. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 1033–1051. Scholar
  45. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487. Scholar
  46. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A. K., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available at
  47. Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Wilcox, K. J., Segal, N. L., & Rich, S. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1031–1039. Scholar
  48. Thornberry, T. P. (2016). Three generation studies: Methodological challenges and promise. In M. J. Shanahan., J. T. Mortimer & M. Kirkpatrick Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 571–596). Springer International Publishing.
  49. Tulviste, T., Mizera, L., & De Geer, B. (2012). Socialization values in stable and changing societies: A comparative study of Estonian, Swedish, and Russian–Estonian mothers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(3), 480–497. Scholar
  50. Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1992). Intergenerational transmission of parenting: A review of studies in nonclinical populations. Developmental Review, 12, 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward, G., Clark, A., Flèche, S., Layard, R., & Powdthavee, N. (2017). The origins of happiness: The science of wellbeing over the life course. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Winkelmann, R. (2005). Subjective well-being and the family: Results from an ordered probit model with multiple random effects. Empirical Economics, 30(3), 749–761. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrik Dobewall
    • 1
  • Mirka Hintsanen
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kateryna Savelieva
    • 1
  • Christian Hakulinen
    • 1
  • Päivi Merjonen
    • 1
  • Kia Gluschkoff
    • 1
  • Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Unit of PsychologyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations