Together is Better: Higher Committed Relationships Increase Life Satisfaction and Reduce Loneliness
- 674 Downloads
Recently, the term mingle was introduced for persons with an intimate relationship who do not define themselves as romantic partners. This study examines differences between single, mingle and partnered adults in terms of life satisfaction and loneliness. Furthermore, need fulfillment is investigated as a mediator concerning the link between relationship status with life satisfaction and emotional loneliness. Lastly, a longitudinal analysis examined whether increases in commitment lead to higher well-being. A total of 764 participants completed an online questionnaire. Mingles fell in between singles and partnered adults regarding emotional loneliness and life satisfaction. With regard to female participants, relatedness and competence need fulfillment fully mediated the link between relationship status and life satisfaction whereas the association between relationship status and emotional loneliness was specifically mediated by the relatedness and autonomy component. Finally, shifting into more committed forms of relationship increased well-being regarding the longitudinal analysis.
KeywordsWell-being Mingle relationship Relationship status Basic psychological needs Self-determination
- Campbell, W. K., Sedikides, C., & Bosson, J. (1994). Romantic involvement, self-discrepancy and psychological well-being: A preliminary investigation. Personal Relationships,1(4), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00073.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., et al. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation And Emotion,39(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Cramer, R. E., Abraham, W. T., Johnson, L. M., & Manning-Ryan, B. (2001). Gender differences in subjective distress to emotional and sexual infidelity: Evolutionary or logical inference explanation? Current Psychology: A Journal For Diverse Perspectives On Diverse Psychological Issues,20(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1015-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German version of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,27(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Methodology in the social sciences. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Holt-Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W., & Jones, B. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine,35(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9018-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Horn, E. E., Xu, Y., Beam, C. R., Turkheimer, E., & Emery, R. E. (2013). Accounting for the physical and mental health benefits of entry into marriage: A genetically informed study of selection and causation. Journal of Family Psychology,27(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Lifespan development and behavior (pp. 253–286). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review Of Psychology,60, 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morris, K., & Fuller, M. (1999). Heterosexual relationships of young women in a rural environment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(4), 531–543. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1393278.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Neubauer, A. B., Schilling, O. K., & Wahl, H.-W. (2017). What do we need at the end of life? Competence, but not autonomy predicts intra-individual fluctuations in subjective well-being in very old age. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,72, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(3), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). Loneliness research: A survey of empirical findings. In L. A. Peplau & S. E. Goldston (Eds.), Preventing the harmful consequences of severe and persistent loneliness (pp. 13–46). Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
- Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2006). Personality development in the context of the Neo-Socioanalytic Model of Personality. In D. K. Mroczek & T. D. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 11–39). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships,5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. (2016). Datenreport 2016: Familie, Lebensform und Kinder. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Datenreport/Downloads/Datenreport2016Kap2.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
- Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5. Aufl.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tesch, I. (2014). Beziehungsstatus: „Mingle“– Wollen wir heute keine Verpflichtungen mehr eingehen?. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.de/isabel-tesch/beziehungsstatus-mingle-w_b_4600248.html.
- Umberson, D., & Williams, K. (1999). Family status and mental health. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of sociology and social research. Handbook of sociology of mental health (pp. 225–253). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Luyckx, K. (2006). Autonomy and relatedness among Chinese sojourners and applicants: Conflictual or independent predictors of well-being and adjustment? Motivation and Emotion,30(4), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9041-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar