Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 2269–2289 | Cite as

Global, Relational, and Sexual Motivation: A Test of Hierarchical Versus Heterarchical Effects on Well-Being

  • Emilie E. GravelEmail author
  • Elke D. Reissing
  • Luc G. Pelletier
Research Paper
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

The quality of sexual motives is an important predictor of sexual well-being. However, how sexual motives are integrated to psychological functioning beyond the sexual domain remains poorly understood. In this study, we used self-determination theory, the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and principles of heterarchical conceptual modeling to investigate motivational antecedents and well-being consequences of autonomous and controlled sexual motivation at three levels of psychological functioning: sexual, relational, and global. University students (N = 853; women = 684, men = 169 men; Mage = 19.93, SD = 4.14) completed validated measurement of motivation and well-being at these three levels of psychological functioning. Results revealed that motives for performing everyday behaviors in general (i.e., global motivation) and motives for being in a committed relationship (i.e., relational motivation) predicted the quality of sexual motives. In turn, the quality of sexual motives predicted differences in well-being. Specifically, high autonomous and low controlled sexual motivation were associated with an overall pattern of optimal psychological functioning. Sexual motives predicted global and relational well-being beyond the contribution of global and relational motivation. These results reflect a heterarchical structure, in which sexual motives can operate independently from relational processes, as opposed to a hierarchical structure, in which sexual motives fully depend on relational processes to operate. Thus, the quality of sexual motives is associated with broad personality dispositions, relationship processes, and well-being beyond the sexual domain in complex ways. These results help illuminate for whom and when sexual experiences result in benefits or costs to well-being.

Keywords

Sexual motivation Self-determination theory Well-being Sexual satisfaction Relationships 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Myriam Pomerleau, Raphaëlle Robidoux, and Karolina Stajerowska for their assistance with data collection, and Veronika Huta, Nafissa Ismail, Martin Lalumière, and Frédérick Philippe for their helpful feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10902_2018_47_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

References

  1. Abbott, R. A., Ploubidis, G. B., Huppert, F. A., Kuh, D., Wadsworth, M. E., & Croudace, T. J. (2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological well- being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 76–91.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.  https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berntson, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). The neuroevolution of motivation. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 188–200). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Birnbaum, G. E., & Finkel, E. J. (2015). The magnetism that holds us together: Sexuality and relationship maintenance across relationship development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 29–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blais, M. R., Sabourin, S., Boucher, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (1990). Toward a motivational model of couple happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1021–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boislard-Pépin, M.-A., Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L., Chartrand, J., & Séguin Lévesque, C. S. (2002). L’impact du style interpersonnel du partenaire sur la compétence, la motivation et la satisfaction sexuelle. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie, 23(3), 105–119.Google Scholar
  7. Brunell, A. B., & Webster, G. D. (2013). Self-determination and sexual experience in dating relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 970–987.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213485442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byers, E. S., & Rehman, U. S. (2014). Sexual well-being. In D. L. Tolman, L. M. Diamond, J. A. Bauermeister, W. H. George, J. G. Pfaus, & L. M. Ward (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 317–337). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne, D. (1976). Social psychology and the study of sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727600300102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, M. L., Barber, L. L., Zhaoyang, R., & Talley, A. E. (2011). Motivational pursuits in the context of human sexual relationships. Journal of Personality, 79, 1333–1368.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00713.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998). Motivation for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1528–1558.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Derogatis, L. R., Rosen, R., Leiblum, S., Burnett, A., & Heiman, J. (2002). The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 317–330.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230290001448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamond, L. M., & Huebner, D. M. (2012). Is good sex good for you? Rethinking sexuality and health. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 54–69.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00408.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gravel, E. E., Pelletier, L. G., & Reissing, E. D. (2016). “Doing it” for the right reasons: Validation of a measurement of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for sexual relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 164–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137–142.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598151009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hooghe, M. (2012). Is sexual well-being part of subjective well-being? An empirical analysis of Belgian (Flemish) survey data using an extended well-being scale. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 264–273.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2010.551791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Impett, E. A., Muise, A., & Peragine, D. (2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships. In D. L. Tolman, L. M. Diamond, J. A. Bauermeister, W. H. George, J. G. Pfaus, & L. M. Ward (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 269–315). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Impett, E. A., Peplau, L. A., & Gable, S. L. (2005). Approach and avoidance sexual motivation: Implications for personal and interpersonal well-being. Personal Relationships, 12, 465–482.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00126.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., Glasser, D. B., Kang, J. H., Wang, T., Levinson, B., et al. (2006). A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: Findings from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 145–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-9005-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Milyavskaya, M., Philippe, F. L., & Koestner, R. (2013). Psychological need satisfaction across levels of experience: Their organization and contribution to general well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muise, A. (2017). When and for whom is sex most beneficial? Sexual motivation in romantic relationships. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 58, 69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Desmarais, S. (2013). Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1320–1332.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfilment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 434–457.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pelletier, L. G., Rocchi, M. A., Vallerand, R. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 329–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pelletier, L. G., & Sarrazin, P. (2007). Measurement issues in self-determination theory and sports. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in sports (pp. 143–152). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  33. Philippe, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., Bernard-Desrosiers, L., Guilbault, V., & Rajotte, G. (2017). Understanding the cognitive and motivational underpinnings of sexual passion from a dualistic model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and well-being. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: Reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549–559.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharp, E. C., Pelletier, L. G., Blanchard, C., & Lévesque, C. (2003, February). The global motivation scale: Its validity and usefulness in predicting success and failure at self- regulation. In: Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Conference for the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  38. Stephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2010). Differentiating components of sexual well-being in women: Are sexual satisfaction and sexual distress independent constructs? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 2458–2468.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01836.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Štulhofer, A., Buško, V., & Brouillard, P. (2010). Development and bicultural validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903100561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  41. Vrangalova, Z. (2015). Does casual sex harm college students’ well-being? A longitudinal investigation of the role of motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 945–959.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0255-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weinstein, N., & DeHaan, C. R. (2014). On the mutuality of human motivation and relationships. In Human Motivation & Interpersonal Relationships (Eds.), Weinstein N (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations