Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 2173–2188 | Cite as

(E)Quality of Life: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effect of Gender Equality on Life Satisfaction

  • Andre P. AudetteEmail author
  • Sean Lam
  • Haley O’Connor
  • Benjamin Radcliff
Research Paper


Several international organizations have recently prioritized promoting equal rights for men and women. Reflecting these priorities, many view gender equality as a means to promote societal well-being; yet still others suggest that it has deleterious effects on the enacting state. To test these pro-equality arguments, we examine the effect of four major indicators of gender (in)equality on life satisfaction: the Gender Empowerment Measure, Gender Development Index, Gender Inequality Index, and the Gender Gap Index (or Global Gender Gap). Utilizing survey data from the World Values Survey and Eurobarometer, we find strong and consistent evidence that promoting gender equality leads to greater subjective well-being. Furthermore, we demonstrate that policies promoting gender equality tend to improve the quality of life for everyone, not just direct beneficiaries of the policies (women). Indeed, men also see strong and significant gains in life satisfaction when the sexes are more equal. As a result, we suggest that scholars of subjective well-being expand research into determinants of quality of life to include equality and other social factors. We also suggest that the findings presented here have tangible implications for governments and policy workers who are tasked with promoting equality and well-being.


Gender Equality Subjective well-being Happiness 

Supplementary material

10902_2018_42_MOESM1_ESM.docx (458 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 458 kb)


  1. Bardhan, K., & Klasen, S. (1999). UNDP’s gender-related indices: A critical review. World Development, 27, 985–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. (2008). Cross-country determinants of life satisfaction: Exploring different determinants across groups in society. Social Choice and Welfare, 30(1), 119–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buvinic, M., Furst-Nichols, R., & Koolwal, G. (2014). Mapping gender data gaps. Data2X. Accessed 18 April 2017.
  4. Coleman, J. (2004). The payoff from women’s rights. Foreign Affairs, 83(3), 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuberes, D., & Teignier-Baqué, M. (2011). Gender inequality and economic growth. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2012. World Bank. Accessed 18 September 2017.
  6. Cullen, D. (1994). Feminism, management, and self-actualization. Gender, Work, and Organization, 1(3), 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 851–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dijkstra, A. G. (2002). Revisiting UNDP’s GDI and GEM: Towards an alternative. Social Indicators Research, 57(3), 301–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijkstra, A. G., & Hanmer, L. C. (2000). Measuring socio-economic gender equality: Toward an alternative for UNDP’s GDI. Feminist Economics, 6(2), 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorius, S. F., & Firebaugh, G. (2010). Trends in global gender inequality. Social Forces, 88(5), 1941–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old-age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review, 17(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ergas, C., & York, R. (2012). Women’s status and carbon dioxide emissions: A quantitative cross-national analysis. Social Science Research, 41(4), 965–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flavin, P., Pacek, A. C., & Radcliff, B. (2014). Assessing the impact of the size and scope of government on human well-being. Social Forces, 92(4), 1241–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fleche, S., Smith, C., & Sorsa, P. (2012). Exploring determinants of subjective wellbeing in OECD countries: Evidence from the World Value Survey., OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2012/01 Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical Journal, 337(a2238), 1–9.Google Scholar
  19. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glick, P., Fiske, S., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981-2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan, T. (1997). Crazy for democracy: Women in grassroots movements. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Klasen, S. (2006). UNDP’s gender-related measures: Some conceptual problems and possible solutions. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 243–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leung, A., Cheryl, K., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R. (2011). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(3), 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Longwe, S. H. (1995). Opposition to gender-sensitive development: Learning to answer back. Gender and Development, 3(1), 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mansbridge, J. J. (1986). Why we lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGinnity, F., & Whelan, C. T. (2009). Comparing work-life conflict in Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research, 93(3), 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meisenberg, G., & Woodley, M. A. (2015). Gender differences in subjective well-being and their relationships with gender equality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(6), 1539–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norgaard, K., & York, R. (2005). Gender equality and state environmentalism. Gender & Society, 19(4), 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD. (2013). Gender equality and women’s rights in the post-2015 agenda: A foundation for sustainable development. Accessed 17 September 2017.
  33. Pacek, A. (2009). Politics and happiness: An empirical ledger. In A. Dutt (Ed.), Happiness, economics, and politics (pp. 231–256). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  34. Pacek, A., & Radcliff, B. (2008). Welfare policy and subjective well-being across nations: An individual-level assessment. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Permanyer, I. (2010). The measurement of multidimensional gender inequality: Continuing the debate. Social Indicators Research, 95(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powley, E. (2006). Rwanda: The impact of women legislators on policy outcomes affecting children and families. Accessed 7 April 2018.
  37. Radcliff, B. (2013). The political economy of human happiness. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  39. Schyns, P. (1998). Crossnational differences in happiness: Economic and cultural factors explored. Social Indicators Research, 43(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 190–225.Google Scholar
  41. Tay, L., & Deiner, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tesch-Römer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective well-being: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in different cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Human development report 2009: Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. Accessed 1 May 2017.
  45. United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Human development report 2016: Human development for everyone. Accessed 1 May 2017.
  46. Verme, P. (2009). Happiness, freedom, and control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wängnerud, L. (2009). Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Waring, M. (1999). Counting for nothing: What men value and what women are worth. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  49. World Bank. (2011). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Accessed 18 September 2017.
  50. World Economic Forum. (2016). The global gender gap report 2016. Accessed 18 September 2017.
  51. York, R., & Bell, S. E. (2014). Life satisfaction across nations: The effects of women’s political status and public priorities. Social Science Research, 48, 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yuki, M., Sato, K., Takemura, K., & Oishi, S. (2013). Social ecology moderates the association between self-esteem and happiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 741–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceMonmouth CollegeMonmouthUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations