Men and Women at Work: Occupational Gender Composition and Affective Well-Being in the United States
Most adults spend almost half their waking hours at work. How people feel during work can have far-reaching consequences for their quality of life. This study traces male and female workers’ affective experiences at work to the gender composition of their occupations. To do this, we draw on nationally representative time diary data on affective experiences at work from the 2010, 2012, and 2013 well-being modules of the American Time Use Surveys, as well as data on occupational gender composition from the Current Population Surveys. Our analytic sample contains 5216 activity records of working at main jobs from 4486 non-self-employed workers. We find significant gender differences in the relationship between occupational gender composition and affective well-being: Working in occupations with higher percentages of male workers is associated with higher levels of unpleasantness and lower levels of meaningfulness at work for women but these associations are not significant for men. We discuss the implications of our findings for gender inequality in work-related well-being and for the stalled progress towards gender integration in occupations.
KeywordsAffective well-being Gender Occupational gender segregation Time use Quality of life United States
The first author, Yue Qian, gratefully acknowledge funding support from the University of British Columbia through the Faculty of Arts Workshop and Visiting Speaker Grant (PG# 12R11213). An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2018 Work and Family Researchers Network Conference in Washington, D.C.
- Blum, L. M. (1991). Between feminism and labor: The significance of the comparable worth movement. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Bradley, H. (1993). Across the gender divide: The entry of men into “women’s jobs”. In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing “women’s work”: Men in nontraditional occupations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, & U.S. Census Bureau (2017). American time use survey user’s guide: Understanding ATUS 2003–2016. https://www.atusdata.org/atus/resources/linked_docs/atususersguide.pdf.
- Fry, R., & Stepler, R. (2017). Women may never make up half of the U.S. workforce. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/31/women-may-never-make-up-half-of-the-u-s-workforce/.
- Krueger, A. B. (Ed.). (2009). Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Krueger, A. B., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2013). National time accounting: The currency of life. In Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226454573.003.0002.
- Loewenstein, G. (2009). That which makes life worthwhile. In Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226454573.003.0003.
- National Institute on Aging, Bureau of Labor Statistics, & U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). American time use survey (ATUS) data dictionary: 2010, 2012, and 2013 well-being module data variables collected in the ATUS well-being module. https://www.bls.gov/tus/wbmintcodebk.pdf.
- National Research Council. (2014). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Nyberg, A., Magnusson Hanson, L., Leineweber, C., Hammarström, A., & Theorell, T. (2017). Occupational gender composition and mild to severe depression in a Swedish cohort: The impact of psychosocial work factors. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817745736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Spencer, A., & Podmore, D. B. (Eds.). (1987). In a man’s world: essays on women in male-dominated professions. Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1993). Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. Ithaca: ILR Press.Google Scholar
- Weeden, K.A., Newhart, M., & Gelbgiser, D. (2018). “Occupational segregation.” In “State of the Union: The Poverty and Inequality Report,” ed. Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality, special issue, pathways magazine. Access 27 July 2018. https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Pathways_SOTU_2018_occupational-segregation.pdf.
- Williams, C. L. (1995). Still a man’s world: Men who do women’s work. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar