Social Capital Dimensions and Subjective Well-Being: A Quantile Approach
- 121 Downloads
This paper investigates the effects of different dimensions of social capital (i.e., trust, social network and norms of civic engagement) on subjective well-being (SWB) at the individual level by attending to differences between the extremes of SWB distribution, that is, between the happiest and the unhappiest people. To this end, we use the 7th wave of the 2014 European Social Survey to run a quantile regression analysis to investigate whether any of these dimensions of social capital has a heterogeneous effect on the full distribution of well-being. We also perform a factor analysis to summarize the principal components of these three dimensions. Our results show that each dimension of social capital has a positive and significant correlation with SWB, but the different dimensions have a heterogeneous effect on the different quantiles of the well-being distribution. All of these dimensions of social capital have a stronger effect on the SWB of the least happy people in society than on the happiest.
KeywordsSocial capital Subjective well-being Quantile regression
JEL ClassificationC21 I31 Z13
We would like to thank the Editor of this journal, Dr. David Bartram, and two anonymous referees, for their valuable suggestions and helpful comments, which have greatly enhanced the quality of the paper.
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H., et al. (2015). Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4, R package version 1.1-8.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89(2), 89–125.Google Scholar
- ESS Round 7: European Social Survey Round 7 Data. (2014). NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
- Fine, B. (2010). Theories of social capital. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Grootaert, C., & van Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital: A synthesis of findings and recommendation from the social capital initiative. Word Bank Working Paper No. 24.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin Books. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Oorschot, W. van, & Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of european welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928705049159.
- Putnam, R. D., Feldstein, L., & Cohen, D. (2003). Better together: Restoring the american community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Rothstein, B., & Eek, D. (2001). The causal mechanism between trust in authorities and trust in others: An experimental approach. Research Proposal to the Swedish Science Council (ronéo).Google Scholar
- Scrivens, K., & Smith, C. (2013). Four interpretations of social capital: An agenda for measurement. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2013/06, 71.Google Scholar