Regulatory Focus Profiles Among Chinese Pre-adolescents and Adolescents and Their Relationship to Personality and Psychological Outcomes
- 192 Downloads
Although regulatory focus has been found to be associated with various variables (e.g., personality, self-esteem, and life satisfaction), relatively little is known about how promotion focus and prevention focus, two forms of regulatory focus, operate within the individual and how combinations of these two foci work. In this research types of regulatory focus profiles as well as their associations with personality predictors and psychological consequences among Chinese preadolescents and adolescents were explored. Latent profile analyses identified four distinct regulatory focus profiles: high regulatory focus (18.7–41%), moderate regulatory focus (41.9–65%), low regulatory focus (4.3–10.3%), and primarily promotion-oriented (3.3–12.3%). Conscientiousness, openness, and neuroticism were consistently significant predictors of these profiles with (a) high conscientiousness and openness increasing probabilities of primarily promotion-oriented and high regulatory focus profiles, and (b) high neuroticism increasing the probability of a high regulatory focus profile. Multiple comparisons of the four profiles revealed differences in psychological outcomes; primarily promotion-oriented preadolescents and adolescents demonstrated the most adaptive pattern with the highest self-esteem, the lowest loneliness, and the highest life satisfaction. Moreover, the regulatory focus profile remained the significant predictor of life satisfaction even after controlling for the Big Five personality traits. Limitations and implications are also discussed.
KeywordsRegulatory focus Personality Self-esteem Loneliness Life satisfaction Latent profile analysis
This research was supported by the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities (Grant No. 15JJD190002).
- Asher, S. R., Hymel, S., & Renshaw, P. D. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55(4), 1456–1464. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1130015.
- Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57(3), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Liu, R., Bian, R., Gao, Q., Ding, Y., & Zhang, J. (2016). I like you more when your behaviors fit my motivational orientation: The effect of interpersonal regulatory fit on interpersonal evaluation. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstreet, B. L., Apodaca, S., McIntyre, A. L., Park, P., et al. (2012). A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hodis, F. A., Hattie, J. A. C., & Hodis, G. M. (2017). Investigating student motivation at the confluence of multiple effectiveness strivings: A study of promotion, prevention, locomotion, assessment, and their interrelationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Komissarouk, S., & Nadler, A. (2014). “I” seek autonomy, “We” rely on each other: Self-construal and regulatory focus as determinants of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help-seeking behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, X., Zou, H., & Liu, Y. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of loneliness scale in Chinese middle school students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(4), 731–733.Google Scholar
- Li, X., Zou, H., Wang, R., & Dou, D. (2008). The developmental characteristics of temporary migrant children’s self-esteem and its relation to learning behavior and teacher-student relationship in Beijing. Psychological Science, 31(4), 909–913. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2008.04.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, W., Xu, Z., & Zou, H. (2012). The effect of parenting on social adjustment of adolescents: Personality as a moderator. Psychological Development & Education., 28(6), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2012.06.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Molden, D. C., Lee, A. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Motivations for promotion and prevention. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 169–187). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Distinguishing levels of approach and avoidance: An analysis using regulatory focus theory. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 489–505). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Tian, L., & Liu, W. (2005). Test of the Chinese version of multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19(5), 301–303.Google Scholar
- Zhou, H., Niu, L., & Zou, H. (2000). A development study on five-factor personality questionaire for middle school students. Psychological Development & Education, 16(1), 48–54.Google Scholar