Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 1241–1258 | Cite as

Feel Good, Do Good Online? Spillover and Crossover Effects of Happiness on Adolescents’ Online Prosocial Behavior

  • Sara ErreygersEmail author
  • Heidi Vandebosch
  • Ivana Vranjes
  • Elfi Baillien
  • Hans De Witte
Research Paper

Abstract

Although the majority of research on adolescents’ online behavior has focused on antisocial behavior such as cyberbullying, adolescents more often behave prosocially than antisocially online. Research on offline prosocial behavior has shown that happiness and prosocial behavior are related. Furthermore, spillover-crossover research suggests that emotional states originating in one context can spill over to another context and can even cross over from one person to another. Therefore, this study examined whether happiness is also related to adolescents’ online prosocial behavior and whether others’ (in this case, parents’) happiness also indirectly, via transmission to adolescents’ own happiness, predicts adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Via a daily diary method, the associations of adolescents’ own happiness and their parents’ happiness with adolescents’ online prosocial behavior were tested on a daily level. The findings suggest that, on a daily level, happiness creates a ripple effect whereby adolescents and parents take their positive emotional states from school and work home, and adolescents act on their happiness by behaving more prosocially online. The strongest spillover and crossover effects were found for girls and their mothers, evoking questions for future research to understand these gender differences.

Keywords

Happiness Online prosocial behavior Spillover Crossover Adolescents Parents 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Research Foundation Flanders under grant FWO G.0335.14 N.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for the Social Sciences and Humanities of the KU Leuven.

Human and Animal Rights Statement

This research involved human participants, who gave informed consent to participate.

References

  1. Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2006). Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(2), 139–150.  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139.Google Scholar
  2. Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., et al. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031578.Google Scholar
  3. Aknin, L. B., Broesch, T., Hamlin, J. K., & Van de Vondervoort, J. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 788–795.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000082.Google Scholar
  4. Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012a). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5.Google Scholar
  5. Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012b). Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e39211.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039211.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5), 353–359.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00366.Google Scholar
  7. Bai, S., Reynolds, B. M., Robles, T. F., & Repetti, R. L. (2017). Daily links between school problems and youth perceptions of interactions with parents: A diary study of school-to-home spillover. Social Development, 26, 813–830.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12229.Google Scholar
  8. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009a). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 23–33.Google Scholar
  9. Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., & van Emmerik, H. I. J. (2009b). Advancements in crossover theory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(3), 206–219.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910939304.Google Scholar
  10. Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 17(4), 319–325.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01705.x.Google Scholar
  11. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030.Google Scholar
  12. Brody, L. R. (1996). Gender, emotional expression, and parent–child boundaries. In R. D. Kavanaugh, B. Zimmerberg, & S. Fein (Eds.), Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 139–170). Hillsdale, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23(10), 2809–2818.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4.Google Scholar
  14. Craig, L., Powell, A., & Smyth, C. (2014). Towards intensive parenting? Changes in the composition and determinants of mothers’ and fathers’ time with children 1992-2006. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 555–579.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12035.Google Scholar
  15. Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 917–929.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721.Google Scholar
  16. Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004.Google Scholar
  17. Doby, V. J., & Caplan, R. D. (1995). Organizational stress as threat to reputation: Effects on anxiety at work and at home. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1105–1123.  https://doi.org/10.5465/256622.Google Scholar
  18. Downey, G., Purdie, V., & Schaffer-Neitz, R. (1999). Anger transmission from mother to child: A comparison of mothers in chronic pain and well mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 62–73.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353883.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, N. (2015). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Enders, C., & Bandalos, D. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5.Google Scholar
  21. Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2017). Nice or naughty? The role of emotions and digital media use in explaining adolescents’ online prosocial and antisocial behavior. Media Psychology, 20(3), 374–400.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1200990.Google Scholar
  22. Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018a). Development of a measure of adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Journal of Children and Media.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2018.1431558.Google Scholar
  23. Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018b). Positive or negative spirals of online behavior? Exploring reciprocal associations between being the actor and the recipient of prosocial and antisocial behavior online. New Media & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817749518.Google Scholar
  24. Ferenczi, N., Marshall, T. C., & Bejanyan, K. (2017). Are sex differences in antisocial and prosocial Facebook use explained by narcissism and relational self-construal? Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 25–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.033.Google Scholar
  25. Fischer, A. (2011). Gendered social interactions in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. In A. Kappas & N. C. Kramer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the internet (pp. 53–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511977589.005.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, C. D., & To, M. L. (2012). Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 865–877.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1803.Google Scholar
  27. Fivush, R. (1989). Exploring sex differences in the emotional content of mother-child conversations about the past. Sex Roles, 20(11–12), 675–691.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288079.Google Scholar
  28. Flook, L., & Fuligni, A. J. (2008). Family and school spillover in adolescents’ daily lives. Child Development, 79(3), 776–787.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01157.x.Google Scholar
  29. Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 13, 172–175.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00431.Google Scholar
  30. Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A. M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S., & Penn, D. L. (2010). Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 849–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.002.Google Scholar
  31. Greene, A. L., & Grimsley, M. D. (1990). Age and gender differences in adolescents’ preferences for parental advice. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5(4), 396–413.  https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489054002.Google Scholar
  32. Greitemeyer, T., & Mügge, D. O. (2014). Video games do affect social outcomes: A meta-analytic review of the effects of violent and prosocial video game play. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 578–589.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213520459.Google Scholar
  33. Handley, I. M., Lassiter, G. D., Nickell, E. F., & Herchenroeder, L. M. (2004). Affect and automatic mood maintenance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 106–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00086-6.Google Scholar
  34. Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Herring, S. C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In Cultural performances: Proceedings of the third Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 278–294). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
  36. Jones, L. P. (1988). The effect of unemployment on children and adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 10(3), 199–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-7409(88)90003-5.Google Scholar
  37. Karremans, J. C. (2005). Forgiveness and its associations with prosocial thinking, feeling, and doing beyond the relationship with the offender. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1315–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205274892.Google Scholar
  38. Klimes-Dougan, B., Brand, A. E., Zahn-Waxler, C., Usher, B., Hastings, P. D., Kendziora, K., et al. (2007). Parental emotion socialization in adolescence: Differences in sex, age and problem status. Social Development, 16(2), 326–342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00387.x.Google Scholar
  39. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618.Google Scholar
  40. Larson, R. W., & Almeida, D. M. (1999). Emotional transmission in the daily lives of families: A new paradigm for studying family processes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
  41. Larson, R. W., & Gillman, S. (1999). Transmission of emotions in the daily interactions of single-mother families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 21–37.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353880.Google Scholar
  42. Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1994). Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Lawson, K. M., Davis, K. D., McHale, S. M., Hammer, L. B., & Buxton, O. M. (2014). Daily positive spillover and crossover from mothers’ work to youth health. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(6), 897–907.  https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000028.Google Scholar
  44. Leaper, C., Anderson, K. J., & Sanders, P. (1998). Moderators of gender effects on parents’ talk to their children: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
  45. Lee, S.-H., Kim, H.-W., & Cho, E.-Y. (2014). What motivates people to post comments online? In SIGHCI 2014 proceedings (p. 14).Google Scholar
  46. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media and technology overview 2015. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  47. Lenhart, A., Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Macgill, A. R., Evans, C., & Vitak, J. (2008). Teens’ video games, and civics. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  48. Lenhart, A., Smith, A., Anderson, M., Duggan, M., & Perrin, A. (2015). Teens, technology and friendships. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  49. Lister, K. M. (2007). Aggression and prosocial behavior in adolescents’ internet and face-to-face interactions (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/. Accessed 12 October 2015.
  50. Lyubomirsky, S., & Tucker, K. L. (1998). Implications of individual differences in subjective happiness for perceiving, interpreting, and thinking about life events. Motivation and Emotion, 22(2), 155–186.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021396422190.Google Scholar
  51. Matjasko, J. L., & Feldman, A. F. (2005). Emotional transmission between parents and adolescents: The importance of work characteristics and relationship quality. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work-life balance (pp. 138–158). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Matjasko, J. L., & Feldman, A. F. (2006). Bringing work home: The emotional experiences of mothers and fathers. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(1), 47–55.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.47.Google Scholar
  53. Mauno, S., Hirvonen, R., & Kiuru, N. (2017). Children’s life satisfaction: The roles of mothers’ work engagement and recovery from work. Journal of Happiness Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9878-6.Google Scholar
  54. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specifc paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x.Google Scholar
  55. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (Eight ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  56. Nelson, S. K., Layous, K., Cole, S. W., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2016). Do unto others or treat yourself? The effects of prosocial and self-focused behavior on psychological flourishing. Emotion, 16(6), 850–861.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000178.Google Scholar
  57. Nelson, J. A., O’Brien, M., Blankson, A. N., Calkins, S. D., & Keane, S. P. (2009). Family stress and parental responses to children’s negative emotions: Tests of the spillover, crossover, and compensatory hypotheses. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(5), 671–679.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015977.Google Scholar
  58. Otake, K., Shimai, S., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Otsui, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Happy people become happier through kindness: A counting kindnesses intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 361–375.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-3650-z.Google Scholar
  59. Paulson, S. E., & Sputa, C. L. (1996). Patterns of parenting during adolescence: Perceptions of adolescents and parents. Adolescence, 31(122), 369–381.Google Scholar
  60. Powdthavee, N., & Vernoit, J. (2013). Parental unemployment and children’s happiness: A longitudinal study of young people’s well-being in unemployed households. Labour Economics, 24, 253–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.09.008.Google Scholar
  61. Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel sem. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(2), 161–182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.557329.Google Scholar
  62. Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141.Google Scholar
  63. Repetti, R. L. (1996). The effects of perceived daily social and academic failure experiences on school-age children’s subsequent interactions with parents. Child Development, 67(4), 1467–1482.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01808.x.Google Scholar
  64. Richardson, R. A., Galambos, N. L., Schulenberg, J. E., & Petersen, A. C. (1984). Young adolescents’ perceptions of the family environment. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 4(2), 131–153.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431684042003.Google Scholar
  65. Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Engaged at work and happy at home: A spillover–crossover model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 271–283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9421-3.Google Scholar
  66. Rosenhan, D. L., Salovey, P., & Hargis, K. (1981). The joys of helping: Focus of attention mediates the impact of positive affect on altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(5), 899–905.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.899.Google Scholar
  67. Salamon, R., Johnson, E. I., & Swendsen, J. (2011). Daily life mechanisms of stress spillover among early adolescents experiencing academic difficulty. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(4), 453–463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0056-7.Google Scholar
  68. Snippe, E., Jeronimus, B. F., aan het Rot, M., Bos, E. H., de Jonge, P., & Wichers, M. (2018). The reciprocity of prosocial behavior and positive affect in daily life. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 139–146.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12299.Google Scholar
  69. Van den Bulck, J. (2004). Television viewing, computer game playing, and Internet use and self-reported time to bed and time out of bed in secondary-school children. Sleep, 27(1), 101–104.Google Scholar
  70. Wang, C.-C., & Wang, C.-H. (2008). Helping others in online games: Prosocial behavior in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 344–346.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0045.Google Scholar
  71. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1034–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1034.Google Scholar
  72. Wright, M. F. (2014). Longitudinal investigation of the associations between adolescents’ popularity and cyber social behaviors. Journal of School Violence, 13(3), 291–314.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2013.849201.Google Scholar
  73. Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2011). The associations between young adults’ face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1959–1962.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.019.Google Scholar
  74. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Geiger, T. C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior and peer relations: Gender moderation and bidirectional associations. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(4), 421–452.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.Occupational and Organisational Psychology and Professional LearningKU LeuvenLouvainBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Work and Organisation StudiesKU LeuvenBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Optentia Research Focus AreaNorth-West UniversityVanderbijlparkSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations