Relative Pay, Rank and Happiness: A Comparison Between Genders and Part- and Full-Time Employees
This paper investigates the effects of comparison pay on job and life satisfaction with longitudinal survey data from Germany. I use linear fixed effects models to account for unobserved heterogeneity and define the reference groups as individuals within the same occupation and industry. Men and women are expected to behave differently to comparison pay and are therefore investigated separately. Additionally, I investigate full- and part-time employees separately because the effect of relative positions in the reference group should affect life satisfaction for full-time employees only. The findings indicate that both relative pay and the individual rank within the respective reference group affect job and life satisfaction for full-time employed males only, while part-time employed females gain job satisfaction with increasing rank within their reference group. Part-time employees experience no change in their life satisfaction due to changes in either inequality dimension.
KeywordsComparison pay Rank-income hypothesis Reference-wage hypothesis Life satisfaction Happiness
JEL ClassificationI31 J16
The author would like to thank Andreas Eberl, Regina T. Riphahn and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- DeStatis. (2017). Verbraucherpreise: Verbraucherpreisindex für Deutschland. https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesamtwirtschaftUmwelt/Preise/Verbraucherpreisindizes/Tabellen_/VerbraucherpreiseKategorien.html?cms_gtp=145110_slot%253D2&https=1. Accessed 31 March 2017.
- Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In A. Paul, A. David, & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00781.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). (2015). Data for the years 1984–2014. https://doi.org/10.5684/soep.v31.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar