Advertisement

Lifespan Differences in a Self Determination Theory Model of Eudaimonia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults

  • Corey S. Mackenzie
  • Eric C. Karaoylas
  • Katherine B. Starzyk
Research Paper

Abstract

Despite the myriad physical, cognitive, and social losses that are increasingly common as we age, a growing body of evidence suggests that aging is positively associated with mental health and well-being. The majority of this evidence is in the form of mental health, personality, and subjective/hedonic well-being outcomes; far less is known about lifespan differences in eudaimonic well-being. The objective of this study was to examine differences across three age groups in a relatively recent model of eudaimonia informed by self-determination theory that focuses on the process of living well, but also acknowledges outcomes of that process. In comparison to young (n = 66) and middle-aged adults (n = 66), older adults (n = 66) were especially likely to be living eudaimonically (i.e., to have intrinsic aspirations, goal autonomy, mindfulness, and basic psychological need fulfillment). The effect of age on well-being outcomes was mixed; the oldest group reported the highest levels of life satisfaction (hedonic well-being) but the lowest levels of purpose and growth (eudaimonic well-being) in comparison to their younger counterparts. As predicted by the model, basic psychological need fulfillment mediated the relationship between motivational constructs and well-being outcomes. Furthermore, the model applied equally well to younger, middle-aged, and older adults. Our results are consistent with recent theoretical models emphasizing the socioemotional benefits of aging, as well as potential challenges to well-being that exist in later life.

Keywords

Eudaimonia Subjective well-being Psychological well-being Life satisfaction Hedonic well-being Aging Gerontology Lifespan Self-determination theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research described in this article was conducted as part of the second author’s Master’s thesis research project. Funding was provided by Manitoba Health Research Council (Establishment Grant).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study received ethics approval from the University of Manitoba’s Research Ethics Board (which required that all participants provide informed consent).

References

  1. Alonso, J., & Lépine, J. P. (2007). Overview of key data from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD). Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsubaie, M., Abbott, R., Dunn, B., Dickens, C., Frieda Keil, T., Henley, W., et al. (2017). Mechanisms of action in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in people with physical and/or psychological conditions: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 55, 74–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. B. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels, S. J., & Naslund, J. A. (2013). The underside of the silver tsunami—older adults and mental health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 493–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beard, J. R., & Bloom, D. E. (2015). Towards a comprehensive public health response to population aging. Lancet, 385, 658–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bélanger, A., Martel, L., & Caron-Malenfant, É. (2005). Population projections for Canada, provinces and territories, 2005–2031. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241.Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard-Fields, F. (2009). Flexible and adaptive socio-emotional problem solving in adult development and aging. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 27, 539–550.  https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2009-0516.Google Scholar
  10. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being u-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Branstrom, R., Duncan, L. G., & Moskowitrz, J. T. (2010). The association between dispositional mindfulness, psychological well-being, and perceived health in a Swedish population-based sample. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brault, M., Meuleman, B., & Bracke, P. (2012). Depressive symptoms in the Belgian population: disentangling age and cohort effects. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47, 903–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byers, A., Yaffe, K., Covinsky, K., Friedman, M., & Bruce, M. (2010). High occurrence of mood and anxiety disorders among older adults: The national comorbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 489–496.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theroy of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., et al. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26, 21–33.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 453–484.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Charles, S. T. (2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1068–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021232. (PMID:21038939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2009). Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132, 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dall, T., Gallo, P., Chakrabarti, R., West, T., Semilla, A., & Storm, M. (2013). An aging population and growing disease burden will require a large and specialized health care workforce by 2025. Health Affairs, 32, 2013–2020.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0714. (PMID:24191094).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. Las Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Della Fave, A. (2009). Optimal experience and meaning: Which relationship? Psychological Topics, 18(2), 285–302.Google Scholar
  28. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 1105–1117.Google Scholar
  29. Diener, E., & Suh, M. E. (1997). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 8, pp. 304–324). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Diener, E., Suh, M. E., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Understanding statistics: Exploratory factor analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ferrand, C., Martinent, G., & Durmaz, N. (2014). Psychological need satisfaction and well-being in adults aged 80 years and older living in residential homes: Using a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 30, 104–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fowers, B. J. (2012). An Aristotelian framework for the human good. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gagne, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation & Emotion, 27, 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ginn, J., & Fast, J. (2006). Employment and social integration in midlife: Preferred and actual time use across welfare regime. Research on Aging, 28, 669–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenfield, E. A., & Marks, N. (2004). Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults’ psychological well-being. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59B, S258–S264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gum, A., King-Kallimanis, B., & Kohn, R. (2009). Prevalence of mood, anxiety and substance-abuse disorders for older Americans in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 769–781.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181ad4f5a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hansen, T., & Slagsvold, B. (2012). The age and subjective well-being paradox revisited: A multidimensional perspective. Norsk Epidemiologist, 22, 187–195.Google Scholar
  39. Hocking, L. B., Koenig, H. G., & Blazer, D. G. (1995). Epidemiology and geriatric psychiatry. In M. T. Tsuang, M. Tohen, & G. P. Zahner (Eds.), Textbook in psychiatric epidemiology (pp. 437–449). New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
  40. Hollingworth, S. A., Burgess, P. M., & Whiteford, H. A. (2010). Affective and anxiety disorders: prevalence, treatment and antidepressant medication use. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jeste, D., Alexopoulos, G. S., Bartels, S. J., Cummings, J. L., Gallo, J. J., Gottlieb, G. L., et al. (1999). Consensus statement on the upcoming crisis in geriatric mental health: Research agenda for the next 2 decades. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 848–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jorm, A. (2000). Does old age reduce the risk of anxiety and depression? A review of epidemiological studies across the adult life span. Psychological Medicine, 30, 11–22. (PMID:10722172).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Joshanloo, M. (2015). Revisiting the empirical distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z.Google Scholar
  47. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802303044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kasser, V. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). The relation of psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness to vitality, well-being, and mortality in a nursing home. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 935–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. In P. Schmuck & K. Sheldon (Eds.), Life goals and well-being. Gottingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  51. Kelloway, K. E. (1998). Using Lisrel for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim, J. E., & Moen, P. (2002). Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well-being: A life-course, ecological model. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57B, S212–S222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kunzmann, U. (2008). Differential age trajectories of positive and negative affect: Further evidence from the Berlin aging study. Journal of Gerontology, 63, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lawton, M. P., Moss, M., Fulcomer, M., & Kleban, M. H. (1982). A research and service oriented multilevel assessment instrument. Gerontology, 37, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee, T., Cai, L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2012). Power analysis for tests of structural equation models. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 181–194). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  58. Lilja, J. L., Frodi-Lundgren, A., Hanse, J. J., Josefsson, T., Lundh, L., Skold, C., et al. (2011). Five facets mindfulness questionnaire—reliability and factor structure: A Swedish version. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40, 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Little, B. R. (1993). Personal projects and the distributed self: Aspects of a conative psychology. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 157–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mahoney, C. T., Segal, D. L., & Coolidge, F. L. (2015). Anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and mindfulness among younger and older adults: Age differences in risk factors for anxiety symptoms. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 81, 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Martin, L. L., & Kleiber, D. A. (2005). Letting go of the negative: Psychological growth from a close brush with death. Traumatology, 11, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miquelon, P., & Valerand, R. J. (2008). Goal motives, well-being, and physical health: An integrative model. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morgan, J., & Robinson, O. (2013). Intrinsic aspirations and personal meaning across adulthood: Conceptuali interrelations and age/sex differences. Developmental Psychology, 49(5), 999–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mosier, K. E., Vasiliadis, H.-M., Lepnurm, M., Puchala, C., Pekrul, C., & Tempier, R. (2010). Prevalence of mental disorders and service utilization in seniors: Results from the Canadian Community Health Survey cycle 1.2. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25, 960–967.  https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2434. (PMID:20054839).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oakley Browne, M. A., Wells, J. E., Scott, K. M., & Magnus, A. M. (2010). The kessler psychological distress scale in Te Rau Hinengaro: The New Zealand mental health survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2001). Influences on loneliness in older adults: A meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 245–266.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2304_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Quaglia, J. T., Braun, S. E., Freeman, S. P., McDaniel, M. A., & Brown, K. W. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for effects of mindfulness training on dimensions of self-reported dispositional mindfulness. Psychological Assessment, 28(7), 803–818.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reynolds, K., Pietrzak, R. H., El-Gabalawy, R., Mackenzie, C. S., & Sareen, J. (2015). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in U.S. older adults: findings from a nationally representative survey. World Psychiatry, 14(1), 74–81.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traints across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ryan, R. M., & LaGuardia, J. G. (2000). What is being optimized over development. A self-determination theory perspective on basic psychological needs across the life span. In S. Qualls & R. Abeles (Eds.), Dialogues on psychology and aging. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  74. Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ryff, C. D. (1989b). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ryff, C. D. (1989c). In the eye of the beholder: Views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ryff, C. D. (1991). Possible selves in adulthood and old age: A tale of shifting horizons. Psychology and Aging, 6, 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Salthouse, T. (2010). Major issues in cognitive aging. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Schaie, K. W. (1965). A general model for the study of developmental problems. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2001). Getting older, getting better? Personal strivings and psychological maturity across the lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sheldon, K. M., Houser-Marko, L., & Kasser, T. (2006). Does autonomy increase with age? Comparing the goal motivations of college students and their parents. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sheldon, K. M., Kasser, T., Houser-Marko, L., Jones, T., & Turban, D. (2005). Doing one's duty: Chronological age, felt autonomy, and subjective well-being. European Journal of Personality, 19, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sneed, J. R., & Krauss Whitbourne, S. (2005). Models of the aging self. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Springer, K. W., Pudrovska, T., & Hauser, R. M. (2011). Does psychological well-being change with age? Longitudinal tests of age variations and further exploration of the multidimensionality of Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 40(1), 392–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet, 385, 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. PNAS, 107, 9985–9990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Streiner, D. L., Cairney, J., & Veldhuizen, S. (2006). The epidemiology of psychological problems in the eldery. Canada Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. United Nations (2009). World population ageing: 2009. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population division. Retrieved on March 28, 2013 from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/WPA2009/WPA2009_WorkingPaper.pdf.
  93. Van Hiel, A., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2009). Ambitions fullfilled? The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic goal attainment on older adults’ ego-integrity and death attitudes. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 68, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vincent, G. K., & Velkoff, V. A. (2010). The next four decades: The older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050 (Current population report P25-1138). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/p25-1138.pdf.
  96. Vittersø, J. (2013). Feelings, meanings, and optimal functioning: Some distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 39–55). Washington, DC: APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Waterman, A. S. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5,(1) 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 913–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Ylanne, V., Williams, A., & Wadleight, P. M. (2009). Ageing well? Older people’s health and well-being as portrayed in UK magazine advertisements. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 4, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of Applied Psychology and Human DevelopmentOntario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations