Competing for Happiness: Attitudes to Competition, Positional Concerns and Wellbeing
Competition is one of the driving forces of the market, but the actual effects that a competitive behavior can produce, especially on well-being, depend on how competition is perceived by economic agents. In this paper we empirically study the relationship among different attitudes to competition, positional concerns, and happiness. Using microdata from an ad-hoc survey administered to all first-year undergraduate students attending courses in economics and sociology at a medium-sized university in the North of Italy, we find a high degree of positionality for several items, especially income. Furthermore, the attitude to competition matters for both positionality and wellbeing: while a negative perception of competition increases the probability of being positional, a positive perception of competition increases life satisfaction. Results by gender highlight that a negative perception of competition is detrimental particularly for women. These results are robust to alternative definitions of the competition indicators and to alternative ways to control for potential endogeneity.
KeywordsPositional concern Competition Happiness Well-being Rivalry
JEL ClassificationD0 D1
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bertrand, M. (2011). New perspectives on gender. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4b, 1543–1590.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Frank, R. H. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. American Economic Review, 75, 101–116.Google Scholar
- Heffetz, O., & Frank R. H. (2008). Preferences for status: Evidence and economic implications. Handbook of Social Economics. Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J., & Wang, S. (2010). Trust and well-being. International Journal of Well-Being, 1(2), 42–78.Google Scholar
- Niederle, M. (2014). Gender. NBER Working Papers No. 20788.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Vol. III). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Paserman, D. (2010). Gender differences in performance in competitive environments: Evidence from professional tennis players. Mimeo: Boston University.Google Scholar
- Van Praag B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2006). An almost integration-free approach to ordered response models. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 2006-047/3.Google Scholar