Advertisement

Self-Efficacy, Emotions and Work Engagement Among Teachers: A Two Wave Cross-Lagged Analysis

  • Irena Burić
  • Ivana Macuka
Research Paper

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the reciprocal relations between teachers’ work engagement and their emotions, both positive and negative, and experienced in relation to their students, by implementing a two-wave panel design. The predictive role of self-efficacy with respect to teachers’ emotions and work engagement was also explored. The study included a sample of 941 teachers from various state schools in Croatia. A cross-lagged analysis demonstrated the reciprocal nature of the relationship between emotions and work engagement. Teachers who reported higher levels of positive emotions of joy, pride and love at first time point, tended to be more engaged in their work at subsequent assessment. The association between negative emotions and work engagement showed the opposite direction—teachers who experienced more anger, fatigue, and hopelessness in the first measurement point, were also less engaged at second time of assessment. Furthermore, teachers who were more engaged in their work in the first time point, also reported about lower levels of negative emotions but higher levels of positive emotions 6 months later. At last, teachers with higher perceived self-efficacy are more engaged in their work, experience more joy, pride and love, and less anger, fatigue and hopelessness, towards their students. However, these effects did not hold upon control of baseline levels of emotions and work engagement.

Keywords

Self-efficacy Emotions Work engagement Teachers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Croatian Science Foundation (Grant No. 5035).

References

  1. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M., & Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 17–28. doi: 10.1037/a0016998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. doi: 10.1108/13620430810870476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. doi: 10.1080/02678370802393649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burić, I., Slišković, A. & Macuka, I. (2017). A mixed-method approach to assessment of teachers’ emotions: Development and validation of Teacher Emotion Questionnaire (TEQ). Educational Psychology (in review).Google Scholar
  9. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0101_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Bernston, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 839–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carson, R. L. (2006). Exploring the episodic nature of teachers’ emotions as it relates to teacher burnout. West Lafayette: Purdue University.Google Scholar
  12. Chang, M.-L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 193–218. doi: 10.1007/s10648-009-9106-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chemers, M. M., Chu, L., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-tit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 374–406. doi: 10.1177/109442819814002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frenzel, A. C. (2014). Teacher emotions. In E. A. Linnenbrink-Garcia & R. Pekrun (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 494–519). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gläser-Zikuda, M., Stuchlíková, I., & Janík, T. (2013). Emotional aspects of learning and teaching: Reviewing the field—discussing the issues. Orbis Scholae, 7(2), 7–22.Google Scholar
  21. González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Llorens, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors of opposite poles? Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 68, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorgievski, M. J., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2008). Work can burn us out and fire us up. In J. R. B. Halbesleben (Ed.), Handbook of stress and burnout in health care (pp. 7–22). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  23. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hakanen, J. J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141(2–3), 415–424. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–854. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00025-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 632–643. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Innstrand, S. T., Langballe, E. M., & Falkum, E. (2011). A longitudinal study of the relationship between work engagement and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Stress and Health, 28(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1002/smi.1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jerusalem, M., & Scwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Scwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195–213). Washington DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  30. Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Human Performance, 17, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahn, W. A. (1990). The psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kavanagh, D. J., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Mood and self-efficacy: Impact of joy and sadness on perceived capabilities. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9(5), 507–525. doi: 10.1007/BF01173005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelchtermans, G. (2011). Vulnerability in teaching: The moral and political roots of structural conditions. In C. Day & J. C. K. Lee (Eds.), New understanding of teachers’ work: Emotions and educational change (pp. 65–84). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1), 27–35. doi: 10.1080/00131910120033628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: An introduction. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and practice (pp. 1–9). London and New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  36. Llorens, S., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W., & Salanova, M. (2007). Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 224–225. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do it about it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  40. Oplatka, I. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior in teaching. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(5), 375–389. doi: 10.1108/09513540910970476.Google Scholar
  41. Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012a). Don’t leave your heart at home: Gain cycles of positive emotions, resources, and engagement at work. Career Development International, 17(6), 537–556. doi: 10.1108/13620431211280123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & van Wijhe, C. I. (2012b). “Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope, and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(9), 1129–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Berchfeld, P., & Perry, R. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 17, 287–316. doi: 10.1080/10615800412331303847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (Eds.). (2014). International handbook of emotions in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2, 247–270. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761–774. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-8854-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). “Yes, I can, I feel good, and I just do it!” On gain cycles and spirals of efficacy beliefs, affect, and engagement. Applied Psychology, 60(2), 255–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00435.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salanova, M., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & Cifre, E. (2014). Flowing together: A longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups. The Journal of Psychology, 148(4), 435–455. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.806290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Xanthopoulou, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 118–131). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schaubroeck, J., & Jones, J. (2000). Antecedents of workplace emotional labor dimensions and moderators of their effects on physical symptoms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 163–183. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<163:AID-JOB37>3.0.CO;2-L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Netherlands. Available from www.schaufeli.com.
  56. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T., Le Blanc, P., Peeters, M., Bakker, A., & De Jonge, J. (2001). Maakt arbeid gezond? Op zoek naar de bevlogen werknemer [Can work produce health? The quest for the engaged worker]. De Psycholoog, 36, 422–428.Google Scholar
  59. Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Schuman, V., & Scherer, K. R. (2014). Concepts and structures of emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 13–35). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Schutz, P., & Zembylas, M. (2009). Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teacher’s lives. Dortecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 152–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00359.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwarzer, R., Schmitz, G. S., & Daytner, G. T. (1999). The teacher self-efficacy scale (On-line publication). Available at http://www.fu-berlin.de/gesund/skalen/t_se.htm.
  64. Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327. doi: 10.1023/A:1026131715856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Toker, S., & Biron, M. (2012). Job burnout and depression: Unraveling their temporal relationship and considering the role of physical activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 699–710. doi: 10.1037/a0026914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Stewart, N., & Joseph, S. (2008). Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 619–630. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 74(3), 235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). A diary study on the happy worker: How job resources relate to positive emotions and personal resources. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 21, 489–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Heuven, E., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among cabin attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(4), 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ZadarZadarCroatia

Personalised recommendations