Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 1883–1902 | Cite as

Mindful and Resilient? Incremental Validity of Sense of Coherence Over Mindfulness and Big Five Personality Factors for Quality of Life Outcomes

  • Dennis GrevensteinEmail author
  • Corina Aguilar-Raab
  • Matthias Bluemke
Research Paper

Abstract

Though conceptually distinct, mindfulness and sense of coherence (SOC) are empirically related aspects that promote health and wellbeing. The present research explored uniqueness by investigating criterion validity and incremental validity beyond the Big Five personality traits when predicting psychological distress, life satisfaction, and burnout. N = 1033 participated in a cross-sectional study. We used multiple regression analysis to examine the incremental validity of mindfulness (CHIME) and SOC (SOC-13) for psychological distress (SCL-K-9), life satisfaction (SWLS), and burnout (MBI-GS scales: emotional exhaustion, cynicism, personal accomplishment). Mindfulness and SOC had incremental validity over the Big Five traits. Despite a strong overlap (45% shared variance) between mindfulness and SOC, SOC was always the stronger predictor: psychological distress (β = −.52), life satisfaction (β = .57), emotional exhaustion (β = −.23), cynicism (β = −.40), and personal accomplishment (β = −.30). For psychological distress, life satisfaction, and cynicism, SOC statistically explained almost all the criterion validity of mindfulness. The clinical utility of mindfulness for predicting psychological health appears to be of minor importance relative to SOC, regardless whether meditators or non-meditators, who differed in mindfulness, were analyzed. Western approaches to assessing mindfulness may lack crucial social and existential dimensions.

Keywords

Sense of coherence Mindfulness Big Five Psychological distress Life satisfaction Burnout 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to Kirstin Giese and Sarah Barthelmann for help with the data collection and to Dirk Hagemann for valuable discussion.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the university hospital Heidelberg (S-114/2015).

References

  1. Allan, B. A., Bott, E. M., & Suh, H. (2015). Connecting mindfulness and meaning in life: Exploring the role of authenticity. Mindfulness, 6(5), 996–1003. doi: 10.1007/s12671-014-0341-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amirkhan, J. H., & Greaves, H. (2003). Sense of coherence and stress: The mechanics of a healthy disposition. Psychology & Health, 18(1), 31–62. doi: 10.1080/0887044021000044233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the Sense of Coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36(6), 725–733. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. doi: 10.1177/1073191104268029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. doi: 10.1177/1073191107313003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belzer, F., Schmidt, S., Lucius-Hoene, G., Schneider, J. F., Orellana-Rios, C. L., & Sauer, S. (2013). Challenging the construct validity of mindfulness assessment—A cognitive interview study of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. Mindfulness, 4(1), 33–44. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0165-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). Measuring mindfulness: First steps towards the development of a comprehensive mindfulness scale. Mindfulness, 4(1), 18–32. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0102-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2014). Konstruktion und erste Validierung eines Fragebogens zur umfassenden Erfassung von Achtsamkeit: Das Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences. [Construction and first validation of the comprehensive inventory of mindfulness experiences]. Diagnostica, 60(3), 111–125. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bianchi, R., Schonfeld, I. S., & Laurent, E. (2015). Burnout-depression overlap: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 36, 28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bph077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowen, R., Balbuena, L., Leuschen, C., & Baetz, M. (2012). Mood instability is the distinctive feature of neuroticism. Results from the British Health and Lifestyle Study (HALS). Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 896–900. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bränström, R., Duncan, L. G., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2011). The association between dispositional mindfulness, psychological well-being, and perceived health in a Swedish population-based sample. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 300–316. doi: 10.1348/135910710X501683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Perils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: Observations from experience. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 242–248. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bph078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237. doi: 10.1080/10478400701598298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Büssing, A., & Glaser, J. (1998). Managerial Stress und Burnout. A Collaborative International Study (CISMS). Die deutsche Untersuchung (Bericht Nr. 44). München: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
  20. Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: The Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204–223. doi: 10.1177/1073191107311467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 451–455. doi: 10.1348/014466508X314891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Mindful emotion regulation: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 560–572. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Charles, S. T., Gatz, M., Kato, K., & Pedersen, N. L. (2008). Physical health 25 years later: The predictive ability of neuroticism. Health Psychology, 27(3), 369. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Charoensukmongkol, P. (2016). Mindful facebooking: The moderating role of mindfulness on the relationship between social media use intensity at work and burnout. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(9), 1966–1980. doi: 10.1177/1359105315569096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, D. M., & Hayes, J. A. (2011). What are the benefits of mindfulness? A practice review of psychotherapy-related research. Psychotherapy, 48(2), 198. doi: 10.1037/a0022062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Derogatis, L. R., & Fitzpatrick, M. (2004). The SCL-90-R, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the BSI-18. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Volume 3: Instruments for adults (3rd ed., pp. 1–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527. doi: 10.1037/t05256-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dreyfus, G. (2011). Is mindfulness present-centred and non-judgmental? A discussion of the cognitive dimensions of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 41–54. doi: 10.1080/14639947.2011.564815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eberth, J., & Sedlmeier, P. (2012). The effects of mindfulness meditation: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 3(3), 174–189. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0101-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(6), 460–466. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.018085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2006). Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(5), 376–381. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.041616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eriksson, M., Lindström, B., & Lilja, J. (2007). A sense of coherence and health. Salutogenesis in a societal context: Åland, a special case? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(8), 684–688. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.047498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190. doi: 10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Feldt, T., Metsäpelto, R., Kinnunen, U., & Pulkkinen, L. (2007). Sense of coherence and five-factor approach to personality: Conceptual relationships. European Psychologist, 12(3), 165–172. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.12.3.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gerlitz, J.-Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  38. Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Giluk, T. L. (2009). Mindfulness, Big Five personality, and affect: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 805–811. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German Version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 127–132. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grevenstein, D., Aguilar-Raab, C., Schweitzer, J., & Bluemke, M. (2016a). Through the tunnel, to the light: Why sense of coherence covers and exceeds resilience, optimism, and self-compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grevenstein, D., & Bluemke, M. (2015a). Can the Big Five explain the criterion validity of sense of coherence for mental health, life satisfaction, and personal distress? Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grevenstein, D., & Bluemke, M. (2015b). Longitudinal factor analysis and measurement invariance of sense of coherence and general self-efficacy in adolescence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grevenstein, D., Bluemke, M., & Kroeninger-Jungaberle, H. (2016b). Incremental validity of sense of coherence, neuroticism, extraversion, and general self-efficacy: Longitudinal prediction of substance use frequency and mental health. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 9. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0412-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grossman, P. (2008). On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(4), 405–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: Comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1034–1040. doi: 10.1037/a0022713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hahn, E., Gottschling, J., & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Short measurements of personality—Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 355–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanley, A. W., Abell, N., Osborn, D. S., Roehrig, A. D., & Canto, A. I. (2016). Mind the gaps: Are conclusions about mindfulness entirely conclusive? Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(1), 103–113. doi: 10.1002/jcad.12066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harris, M. A., Brett, C. E., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2016). Personality stability from age 14 to age 77 years. Psychology and Aging, 31(8), 862. doi: 10.1037/pag0000133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Haukkala, A., Konttinen, H., Lehto, E., Uutela, A., Kawachi, I., & Laatikainen, T. (2013). Sense of coherence, depressive symptoms, cardiovascular diseases, and all-cause mortality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 75(4), 429–435. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31828c3fa4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hochwälder, J. (2012). The contribution of the big five personality factors to sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Iani, L., Lauriola, M., Cafaro, V., & Didonna, F. (2017). Dimensions of mindfulness and their relations with psychological well-being and neuroticism. Mindfulness, 8(3), 664–676. doi: 10.1007/s12671-016-0645-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jeserich, F. (2013). Can sense of coherence be modified by religious/spiritual interventions?: A critical appraisal of previous research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 9.Google Scholar
  54. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
  55. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
  56. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York, NY: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  57. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology-Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bpg016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kashdan, T. B., & McKnight, P. E. (2013). Commitment to a purpose in life: An antidote to the suffering by individuals with social anxiety disorder. Emotion, 13(6), 1150–1159. doi: 10.1037/a0033278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Klaghofer, R., & Brähler, E. (2001). Konstruktion und teststatistische Prüfung einer Kurzform der SCL-90-R. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 49, 115–124.Google Scholar
  60. Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256. doi: 10.1037/a0015309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lindström, B. (2001). The meaning of resilience. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 13(1), 7–12. doi: 10.1515/IJAMH.2001.13.1.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Linehan, M. M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  64. Linehan, M. M. (1993b). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  65. Moksnes, U. K., Espnes, G. A., & Haugan, G. (2013a). Stress, sense of coherence and emotional symptoms in adolescents. Psychology & Health, 29(1), 32–49. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.822868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moksnes, U. K., Løhre, A., & Espnes, G. A. (2013b). The association between sense of coherence and life satisfaction in adolescents. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 22(6), 1331–1338. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0249-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nilsson, H. (2014). A four-dimensional model of mindfulness and its implications for health. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(2), 162–174. doi: 10.1037/a0036067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nilsson, K. W., Leppert, J., Simonsson, B., & Starrin, B. (2010). Sense of coherence and psychological well-being: Improvement with age. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(4), 347–352. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.081174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ormel, J., Jeronimus, B. F., Kotov, R., Riese, H., Bos, E. H., Hankin, B., et al. (2013). Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(5), 686–697. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Otonari, J., Nagano, J., Morita, M., Budhathoki, S., Tashiro, N., Toyomura, K., et al. (2012). Neuroticism and extraversion personality traits, health behaviours, and subjective well-being: The Fukuoka Study (Japan). Quality of Life Research, 21(10), 1847–1855. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0098-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pallant, J. F., & Lae, L. (2002). Sense of coherence, well-being, coping and personality factors: Further evaluation of the sense of coherence scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 39–48. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00134-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Piedmont, R. L., Magyar-Russell, G., DiLella, N., & Matter, S. (2014). Sense of coherence: Big five correlates, spirituality, and incremental validity. Current Issues in Personality Psychology. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2014.43096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Randler, C., Luffer, M., & Müller, M. (2015). Morningness in teachers is related to a higher sense of coherence and lower burnout. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 595–606. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0699-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS). In C. Maslach, S. E. Jackson, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  75. Schoen, J. L., DeSimone, J. A., & James, L. R. (2011). Exploring joint variance between independent variables and a criterion: Meaning, effect, and size. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 674–695. doi: 10.1177/1094428110381787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schumacher, J., Gunzelmann, T., & Brähler, E. (2000a). Deutsche Normierung der Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky. Diagnostica, 46(4), 208–213. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.46.4.208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schumacher, J., Wilz, G., Gunzelmann, T., & Brähler, E. (2000b). Die Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky—Teststatistische Überprüfung in einer repräsentativen Belvölkerungsstichprobe und Konstruktion einer Kurzskala. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 50(12), 472–482. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  79. Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 862–882. doi: 10.1037/a0024950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Specht, J., Luhmann, M., & Geiser, C. (2014). On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: Latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 540–556. doi: 10.1037/a0036863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Strine, T. W., Chapman, D. P., Balluz, L. S., Moriarty, D. G., & Mokdad, A. H. (2008). The associations between life satisfaction and health-related quality of life, chronic illness, and health behaviors among U.S. community-dwelling adults. Journal of Community Health, 33(1), 40–50. doi: 10.1007/s10900-007-9066-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taylor, N. Z., & Millear, P. M. R. (2016). The contribution of mindfulness to predicting burnout in the workplace. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vago, D. R., & Silbersweig, D. A. (2012). Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): A framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2009). Differential item function across meditators and non-meditators on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 516–521. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Van Dam, N. T., Hobkirk, A. L., Sheppard, S. C., Aviles-Andrews, R., & Earleywine, M. (2014). How does mindfulness reduce anxiety, depression, and stress? An exploratory examination of change processes in wait-list controlled mindfulness meditation training. Mindfulness, 5(5), 574–588. doi: 10.1007/s12671-013-0229-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. von Humboldt, S., Leal, I., & Pimenta, F. (2014). Living well in later life: The influence of sense of coherence, and socio-demographic, lifestyle and health-related factors on older adults’ satisfaction with life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(3), 631–642. doi: 10.1007/s11482-013-9262-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—The Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weinstein, N., Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). A multi-method examination of the effects of mindfulness on stress attribution, coping, and emotional well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 374–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Williams, M. J., Dalgleish, T., Karl, A., & Kuyken, W. (2014). Examining the factor structures of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and the Self-Compassion Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 407–418. doi: 10.1037/a0035566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A systematic review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21(2), 152–169. doi: 10.1017/S0959259810000420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Grevenstein
    • 1
    Email author
  • Corina Aguilar-Raab
    • 2
  • Matthias Bluemke
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Psychological InstituteUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial MedicineUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations