Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1347–1371 | Cite as

Subjective Well-Being in an Era of Relentless Growth: The Case of Turkey Between 2004 and 2014

  • Kâzım Anıl ErenEmail author
  • Ahmet Atıl Aşıcı
Research Paper


This paper analyses the subjective well-being levels in Turkey between 2004 and 2014 by relying on Turkish Statistical Institute’s Life Satisfaction Surveys. This is the first study ever suggesting an alternative well-being approach for Turkish population based on subjective measures. Inspired from the Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness and Cummins et al.’s (2003) Australian Unity Well-Being Index approaches, we constructed several subjective well-being indexes for the first time in Turkey. The main findings of this study are as follows: (1) Despite GDP per capita (in current $) doubles between 2004 and 2014 period, constructed indexes show slight increments or stagnate around some level. (2) We found a slight support for Frey and Stutzer’s (2002a) argument that GDP per capita is insensible after some threshold. (3) National well-being indicators are found to be more volatile than individual well-being indicators, which hints that individuals may be using their informal social networks as a shelter from the economic and politic fluctuations in the country. (4) Much of the volatility in subjective well-being indexes are caused by psychological well-being indicators. Previous results indicate that as basic requirements of a society are met after some level of per capita income, non-materialistic aspirations- like happiness, freedom or justice-started to surpass materialistic aspirations. Same is true for Turkey- this led us to conclude that the reductionist approach of delegating the solution of social and ecological problems to economic growth process may lie beneath this dismal outcome in Turkey in the last decade. Thus, we recommend policy-makers to upkeep with the reform process which would make economic and political system more transparent and competitive, which in turn, help to ameliorate the channels through which individuals fulfil their aspirations.


Subjective well-being Gross national happiness Economic growth Turkey 

JEL Classification

D63 I31 O12 



We are grateful for The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) for the financial support under the 1001 Scientific and Technological Research Projects Funding Program No: 115K576. We would like to thank Burç Ülengin and Bekir Ağırdır for their invaluable comments on this study; to TURKSTAT for their provision of the LSS data and to Ömer Faruk Dağlar for his help on the paper.


  1. Agyar, E. (2013). Contribution of perceived freedom and leisure satisfaction to life satisfaction in a sample of Turkish women. Social Indicators Research, 116, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0268-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aşıcı, A., Eren, K., & Acar, U. (2017). Türkiye Mutluluk Atlası. İstanbul: İTÜ Vakfı Yayınları.Google Scholar
  4. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2015). The dark side of Chinese growth: Declining social capital and well-being in times of economic boom. World Development, 74, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144. doi: 10.1257/jel.46.1.95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cnel and Istat (2014). Benessere Equo Sostenibile. Retrieved December 25, 2016, from BES 2014 Report:
  7. Cobb, C., Halstead, T., & Rowe, J. (1995). The genuine progress indicator: Summary of data and methodology (Vol. 15). San Francisco: Redefining Progress.Google Scholar
  8. Cummins, R., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 24, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R., Lau, A., & Davern, M. (2012). Subjective wellbeing homeostasis. In K. Land, A. Michalos, & M. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 79–98). Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2421-1_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of moses abramovitz (pp. 89–125). Elsevier Inc, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7.
  11. Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 27, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eren, K., & Aşıcı, A. (2016). The determinants of happiness in Turkey: Evidence from city-level data. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9746-9.Google Scholar
  13. Esmer, Y. (2012). Türkiye Değerler Atlası 2012. İstanbul: Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
  14. European Values Study. (1981–2008). Longitudinal data file. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, ZA4804 Data File Version 2.0.0. doi: 10.4232/1.11005.
  15. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). Happiness and Economics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (2013). Kapitalizm ve Modern Sosyal Teori (4th ed.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
  18. Gökdemir, Ö. (2011). Mutluluk ve İktisadi Parametreler Üzerine Bir İnceleme (Doctoral dissertation). İstanbul: Retrieved from Ulusal Tez Merkezi (287809).Google Scholar
  19. Goodwin, N., Nelson, J., & Harris, J. (2008). Macroeconomics in Context (6th ed.). New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  20. Hair, J., Jr., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Helliwell, J. (2001). Social capital, the economy and well-being. In K. Banting, A. Sharpe, & F. St-Hilaire (Eds.), The review of economic perfomance and social progress. Montreal and Ottawa: Institute for Research on Public Policy and Center for the Study of Living Standards.Google Scholar
  22. Helliwell, J. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helliwell, J., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2015). The geography of world happiness. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2015 (pp. 12–42). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuznets, S. (1934). National income, 1929–1932. National Bureau of Economic Research, 49, 1–12.Google Scholar
  26. Li, J. (2016). Why economic growth did not translate into increased happiness: Preliminary results of a multilevel modeling of happiness in China. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martínez-Alier, J. (2012). Environmental justice and economic degrowth: an alliance between two movements. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2011.648839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mishra, S. (2007). A comparative study of various inclusive indices and the index constructed by the principal components analysis. Retrieved August 22, 2016, from Uni München:
  29. Mishra, S. (2008). On construction of Robust composite indices by linear aggregation. Retrieved August 22, 2016, from Social Sciences Research Network:
  30. nef (2015). The happy planet index: 2012 report. Retrieved April 4, 2015, from The Happy Planet Index:
  31. Neugarten, B. L., Havinghurst, R. J., & Tobin, S. S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD (2006). Alternative measures of well-being. In Economic policy reforms 2006: Going for growth. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from doi:
  33. OECD (2013) OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. OECD Publishing. doi:
  34. OECD. (2015). What’s the Better Life Index? Retrieved January 21, 2015, from OECD Better Life Index.
  35. OECD (2016). Better life index. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from Better Life Index:
  36. Office for National Statistics (2016). Measuring national well-being: domains and measures. Retrieved December 25, 2016, from Office for National Statistics:
  37. Özcan, K., Böke, S., & Kara, M. (2008). The determinants of the perception of happiness about quality of life amongst Turkish people. ERF Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  38. Rinzin, C., Vermeulen, W., & Glasbergen, P. (2007). Public perceptions of Bhutan’s approach to sustainable development in practice. Sustainable Development, 15, 52–68. doi: 10.1002/sd.293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rose, R., & Özcan, Y. (2007). First European quality of life survey: Quality of life in Turkey. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  40. Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. Anchor.Google Scholar
  41. Şener, A., Terzioğlu, R., & Karabulut, E. (2007). Life satisfaction and leisure activities during men’s retirement: A Turkish sample. Aging & Mental Health, Aging & Mental Health, 11(1), 30–36. doi: 10.1080/13607860600736349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Retrieved February 24, 2015, from Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress:
  43. The World Bank (2016). World development indicators. Retrieved October 14, 2016, from World Bank:
  44. TURKSTAT (2015). Yaşam Memnuniyeti Araştırması, 2014. Retrieved from TURKSTAT:
  45. TURKSTAT. (2016). Quality of life in cities of Turkey. Retrieved from TURKSTAT:
  46. UNDP (2015). Human development index (HDI). Retrieved January 15, 2015, from United Nations Development Programme:
  47. University of Waterloo (2016). Canadian index well-being. Retrieved December 25, 2016, from University of Waterloo:
  48. Ura, K., Alkire, S., Zangmo, T., & Wangdi, K. (2012) A short guide to gross national happiness index. Thimphu, Bhutan: The Centre for Bhutan Studies. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from
  49. Van Praag, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2008). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
  50. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Questions on Happiness. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective wellbeing, an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 7–26). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Part 1: Assessing livability of nations by happiness. In R. Veenhoven (Ed.), Happiness in nations. Retrieved from
  52. Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in forty-four nations in the early 1990s. In E. Diener & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 257–288). Cambridge, MA: Well-being and Quality of Life Series: A Bradford Book.Google Scholar
  53. Veenhoven, R. (2017). Happy life years in 159 nations 20052014. Retrieved January 9, 2017, from World Database of Happiness:
  54. World Values Survey Wave 6 (2010–2014) Official Aggregate v.20150418. World Values Survey Association ( Aggregate file producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid Spain.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management Engineering DepartmentIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations