Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1217–1239 | Cite as

Psychological Benefits of the “Maker” or Do-It-Yourself Movement in Young Adults: A Pathway Towards Subjective Well-Being

  • Ann Futterman CollierEmail author
  • Heidi A. Wayment
Research Paper

Abstract

Over the past several decades, increasing numbers of people have become involved in the do-it-yourself (DIY) or “Maker” movement, i.e., creating a wide range of products from home improvement to self-service to crafts. Little is known about the psychological benefits of these actions; there is an assumption that involvement ultimately increases quality of life. We surveyed 465 college students to describe their participation in a variety of Maker undertakings ranging from domestic arts, arts and crafts, to DIY activities, and examined four potential mediators of the relationship between a Maker identity and SWB. We inquired about the time spent engaged in the activities, reasons for involvement, as well as the immediate and long-term benefits received from Making. We found that college students spent approximately 3 h a week involved in Maker activities and that they most often engaged in domestic arts (e.g., cooking, baking, and gardening). The most important reasons provided for involvement in Maker activities were mood-repair, socializing with friends, and the ability to “stay present-focused.” Having a Maker identity was associated with subjective well-being (SWB), primarily explained by high arousal (i.e., exciting or stimulating) during Maker activities, but not positive mood. Trait rumination and reduced self-focus, or quiet ego, were also related to SWB and suggest the importance of reduced self-focus in understanding the relationship between Making and SWB. Taken together, it appears that Maker identity may be a potential pathway towards SWB.

Keywords

Do-it-yourself movement Maker identity Subjective well-being Positive affect High arousal mood Rumination Quiet ego 

References

  1. Adams-Price, C. E., & Steinman, B. A. (2007). Crafts and generative expression: A qualitative study of the meaning of creativity in women who make jewelry in midlife. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(4), 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albinsson, P. A., Wolf, M., & Kopf, D. A. (2010). Anti-consumption in East Germany: Consumer resistance to hyperconsumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 412–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asmundson, J. G., Fetzner, M. G., DeBoer, L. B., Powers, M. B., Otto, M. W., & Smits, A. J. (2013). Let’s get physical: A contemporary review of the anxiolytic effects of exercise for anxiety and its disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 30(4), 362–373. doi: 10.1002/da.22043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Collier, A. F. (2011). The well-being of women who create with textiles: Implications for art therapy. Art Therapy, 28(3), 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collier, A. F., & von Károlyi, C. (2014). Rejuvenation in the “Making”: Lingering mood repair in textile handcrafters. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collier, A. F., Wayment, H. A., & Birkett, M. (2016). Impact of making textile handcrafts on mood enhancement and inflammatory immune changes. Art Therapy, 33(4), 178–185. doi: 10.1080/07421656.2016.1226647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, A. L., Sarkisian, N., & Winner, E. (2009). Flow and happiness in later life: An investigation into the role of daily and weekly flow experiences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(6), 703–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. The Psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. W. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815–822. doi: 10.1086/268667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delle Fave, A. D., Brdar, I., Wissing, M. P., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). Sources and motives for personal meaning in adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 517–529. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.830761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The investigation of optimal experience and apathy: Developmental and psychosocial implications. European Psychologist, 10(4), 264–274. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.10.4.264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demır, M., & Weitekamp, L. A. (2007). I am so happy’ cause today I found my friend: Friendship and personality as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(2), 181–211. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9012-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denmead, K. (2013). Why the Maker Movement is here to stay. Make: We are all Makers. http://makezine.com/2013/06/03/why-the-maker-movement-is-here-to-stay/.
  16. DiLorenzo, T. M., Bargman, E. P., Stucky-Ropp, R., Brassington, G. S., Frensch, P. A., & LaFontaine, T. (1999). Long-term effects of aerobic exercise on psychological outcomes. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 28(1), 75–85. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerin, W., Davidson, K. W., Christenfeld, N. J., Goyal, T., & Schwartz, J. E. (2006). The role of angry rumination and distraction in blood pressure recovery from emotional arousal. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(1), 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghalim, A. (2013). Fabbing practices: An ethnography in Fab Lab. Amsterdam. Master diss., Universiteit van Amsterdam (New Media and Culture Studies), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://www.scribd.com/doc/127598717/FABBING-PRACTICES-AN-ETHNOGRAPHY-IN-FAB-LAB-AMSTERDAM.
  20. Hemphill, D., & Leskowitz, S. (2013). DIY activists: Communities of practice, cultural dialogism, and radical knowledge sharing. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huebner, S. (2001). Multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
  22. Just, N., & Alloy, L. B. (1997). The response styles theory of depression: Tests and an extension of the theory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(2), 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanske, P., Heissler, J., Schonfelder, S., Bonger, A., & Wessa, M. (2011). How to regulate emotion? Neural networks for reappraisal and distraction. Cerebral Cortex, 21(6), 1379–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuehner, C., & Weber, I. (1999). Responses to depression in unipolar depressed patients: An investigation of Nolen-Hoeksema’s response styles theory. Psychological Medicine, 29(06), 1323–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kulkarni, A., Anderson, W., Sanders, M. A., Newbold, J., & Marin, L. L. (2016). Manipulated flow reduces downstream defensiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuznetsov, S., & Paulos, E. (2010). Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. In Proceedings of NordiCHI(2010) (pp. 295–304). http://www.staceyk.org/hci/KuznetsovDIY.pdf.
  27. Levine, F., & Heimerl, C. (2008). Handmade nation: The rise of DIY, art, craft, and design. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Self-perpetuating properties of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mori, M., Takano, K., & Tanno, Y. (2015). Role of self-focus in the relationship between depressed mood and problem solving. Motivation and Emotion, 39(5), 827–838.Google Scholar
  30. National Center for Education and Statistics (NCES). (2013). Table 302.60. Percentages of 18- to 24-year-olds enrolled in degree-granting institutions, by level of institution and sex and race/ethnicity of student: 1967 through 2012. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_302.60.asp on July 14, 2016.
  31. Nolan, S. A., Roberts, J. E., & Gotlib, I. H. (1998). Neuroticism and ruminative response style as predictors of change in depressive symptomatology. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(5), 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pöllänen, S. H. (2015a). Crafts as leisure-based coping: Craft makers’ descriptions of their stress-reducing activity. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31(2), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pöllänen, S. (2015b). Elements of crafts that enhance well-being: Textile craft makers’ descriptions of their leisure activity. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Powers, M. B., Asmundson, G. J., & Smits, J. (2015). Exercise for mood and anxiety disorders: The state-of-the science. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 44(4), 237–239. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1047286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson, M. S., & Alloy, L. B. (2003). Negative cognitive styles and stress-reactive rumination interact to predict depression: A prospective study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rusting, C. L., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1998). Regulating responses to anger: Effects of rumination and distraction on angry mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.Google Scholar
  41. Schiefele, U., & Raabe, A. (2011). Skills-demands compatibility as a determinant of flow experience in an inductive reasoning task. Psychological Reports, 109(2), 428–444. doi: 10.2466/04.22.PR0.109.5.428-444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schueller, S. M., & Seligman, M. E. (2010). Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning: Relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwartz, S. J., Hardy, S. A., Zamboanga, B. L., Meca, A., Waterman, A. S., Picariello, S., et al. (2015). Identity in young adulthood: Links with mental health and risky behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 39–52.Google Scholar
  44. Sumner, R., Burrow, A. L., & Hill, P. L. (2015). Identity and purpose as predictors of subjective well-being in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 3(1), 46–54. doi: 10.1177/2167696814532796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thayer, R. E., Newman, J. R., & McClain, T. M. (1994). Self-regulation of mood: Strategies for changing a bad mood, raising energy, and reducing tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 910–925. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomashow, M. (1996). Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmentalist (p. 228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tidikis, V. (2012). Mood and creativity: The mediating role of attention. Norfolk: Old Dominion University. Google Scholar
  48. Titus, J. E., & Sinacore, A. L. (2013). Art-Making and well-being in healthy young adult women. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 40(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Dillen, L. F., & Koole, S. L. (2007). Clearing the mind: A working memory model of distraction from negative mood. Emotion, 7(4), 715–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wayment, H. A., & Bauer, J. J. (2016). The quiet ego: Concept, measurement, and well-being. In M. D. Robinson & M. Eid (Eds.), The Happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Wayment, H. A., Bauer, J. J., & Sylaska, K. (2015a). The quiet ego scale: Measuring the compassionate self-identity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 999–1033. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9546-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wayment, H. A., Collier, A. F., Birkett, M., Traustadottir, T., & Till, R. E. (2015b). Brief quiet ego contemplation reduces oxidative stress and mind-wandering. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01481.Google Scholar
  55. Wayment, H. A., West, T. N, & Craddock, E. B. (2016). Compassionate values as a resource during the transition to college: Quiet ego, compassionate goals, and self-compassion. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 28(2), 93–114.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, C. C. (2008). Re-thinking the motives of do-it-yourself (DIY) consumers. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(3), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolf, M., & McQuitty, S. (2011). Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS Review, 1(3–4), 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolf, M., & McQuitty, S. (2013). Circumventing traditional markets: An empirical study of the marketplace motivations and outcomes of consumers’ do-it-yourself behaviors. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations